Mayweather is similiar to ***** and has exposed to racist

[elgu]

He along with ***** changed the game, they were great at what they did and were only hated by racist who were mad a black man was on top. That is why Trump is getting support because the racist people have been exposed..similiar to how lesser talented fighters who accomplish far less then Mayweather get praised while Floyd was slammed for fighting high level comp..

It is hilarious and it is clear as day that racism is behind it, YEA I SAID IT YA'LL ARE ****ING RACIST.. You call other fighters great who have not even done more then ****ing Berto, yet slam Floyd for fighting Berto for his retirement fight. Go vote for Trump and show your true colors"MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" yea we know what that means-translation=make a white man president again...

***** did nothing of importance in his presidency and all Mayweather did from 2002 to 2015 is cherry pick. They are merely showmen to the real people in power.

Trump might be racist but a person calling everyone racist is ignorant. I prefer a racist over and ignorant.

All Berto did was beat the bum named Victor Ortiz. He deserves to be labeled a bum.

[M Bison]

Looool larryxxx... This is golden ******ity even by your standards.

BTW in terms of *****, unemployment has increased during his time a shootings of black men by the police have also increased. So what did he do for you?

Just blatant attention seeking troll post.

[j0zef]

Looool larryxxx... This is golden ******ity even by your standards.

BTW in terms of *****, unemployment has increased during his time a shootings of black men by the police have also increased. So what did he do for you?

Abso-effing-lutely false. January 2009 unemployment: 7.8% June 2016: 4.9%

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

He inherited a ****show from Bush and it took a couple of years to start addressing it.

[bigjavi973]

Abso-effing-lutely false. January 2009 unemployment: 7.8% June 2016: 4.9%

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

He inherited a ****show from Bush and it took a couple of years to start addressing it.

This is can be true and false

Jozef do you know the difference between participation rates vs unemployment rates???

Just in case you dont:

"A citizen is classified as a member of the labor force if he has a job or is actively looking for a job. The participation rate is the percentage of adult Americans, excluding those incarcerated or otherwise institutionalized, who are members of the labor force. The 21st century has seen a steady decline in labor force participation. In 2000, it was 67%; by 2013, it had fallen to 63%."

http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answ...#ixzz4GIPTqiUt



http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answ...yment-rate.asp

Participation rates (the rates that "really" matter when it comes to job growth in america) are actually down:



http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

basically means that there's less and less people actively seeking employment

[Larry the boss]

What ever Larry grow up and quit making excuses. Mayweather was great but he always had everything in his favor. We all know he lost the first Castillo fight, others can be mentioned too. Quit making excues for Floyd he fostered alot of racsim to help him earn money, don't throw ***** in the same boat with that punk.

No, No you said it wasnt the record right? then what is the record for a fighter to retire with the most wins and no losses or draws?

[jmrf4435]

OOO jesus, these kinds of statement perpetuate racism. "white people are racist" is racist statment.

The thing that boggles me the most is the fact suddenly everyone is "racist" if they disagree with ***** or don't like Floyd.

Its sad logic because it implies there is nothing that white people couldn't possibly like about Floyd or *****, therefore their dislike is "racism".

The fact is that Floyd has a ton of unlikable traits and I see no problem with white people not liking him, or anyone else disagreeing with *****s policy, white black, or brown.

Wanna know how many people were killed in Chicago due to black on black gang violence? And we don't here ****tt from the media?violence in Chicago in July 65 people were killed- All black on black crime. Reporting on it wouldn't fit the "evil white man" agenda that's being created. Stop listening to the media, please. Their game is all relative to partisan politics.

[j0zef]

This is can be true and false

Jozef do you know the difference between participation rates vs unemployment rates???

Just in case you dont:

"A citizen is classified as a member of the labor force if he has a job or is actively looking for a job. The participation rate is the percentage of adult Americans, excluding those incarcerated or otherwise institutionalized, who are members of the labor force. The 21st century has seen a steady decline in labor force participation. In 2000, it was 67%; by 2013, it had fallen to 63%."

http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answ...#ixzz4GIPTqiUt



http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answ...yment-rate.asp

Participation rates (the rates that "really" matter when it comes to job growth in america) are actually down:



http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

basically means that there's less and less people actively seeking employment

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/03/dec...ipation-rates/

I work/worked in finance for 3 different Fortune 100 companies. Bush left the economy in shambles, and it's infinitenly better today than it was in 08. You can argue that ***** doesn't deserve the credit (or only gets partial credit) for the turnaround of the economy, but don't come in here trying to say that ***** ran the country in the ground. If he didn't have to deal with old conservative twats who can't see further than their bank accounts, we may actually live in a respectable nation.

[bigjavi973]

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/03/dec...ipation-rates/

I work/worked in finance for 3 different Fortune 100 companies. Bush left the economy in shambles, and it's infinitenly better today than it was in 08. You can argue that ***** doesn't deserve the credit (or only gets partial credit) for the turnaround of the economy, but don't come in here trying to say that ***** ran the country in the ground. If he didn't have to deal with old conservative twats who can't see further than their bank accounts, we may actually live in a respectable nation.

now where in the world did I say that ***** ran this country to the ground!?

If anything my problem with ***** is his whole Pen and phone bs.

I was just stating that there are less people ACTIVELY seeking employment. Yes unemployment rates are a bit down... but the participation rates are also down as well.

[j0zef]

now where in the world did I say that ***** ran this country to the ground!?

If anything my problem with ***** is his whole Pen and phone bs.

I was just stating that there are less people ACTIVELY seeking employment. Yes unemployment rates are a bit down... but the participation rates are also down as well.

The other dude did.

That's fine - the article I posted shows that there are many different reasons why there are less people seeking employment (more college students, baby boomers retiring earlier, etc). It also mentions that regardless of who the president is, the economists predict the participation rate will in general continue to decrease down to ~60% by 2050.

[b00g13man]

Not like this.