Comments Thread For: No Santa Cruz-Frampton Rematch Clause, DiBella Expects Sequel

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

Leo Santa Cruz's fight with Carl Frampton was a voluntary defense of his featherweight world title. But there apparently was no rematch clause that would allow Santa Cruz another shot in case he lost, according to Barry McGuigan, who promotes Frampton.

[Click Here To Read More]

[turnedup]

Prepare to get reamed in the negotiations for not giving your champion a rematch clause as part of his package.

[jmrf4435]

Framton has soo many better options right now than Cruz. Maybe down the line, I just see NO reason for Frampton to give this guy a rematch.

[Shadoww702]

Sign me up!!!!! But in VEGAS soo I can be there LIVE!!!!

[Shadoww702]

Framton has soo many better options right now than Cruz. Maybe down the line, I just see NO reason for Frampton to give this guy a rematch.

Why? Because it should of been a draw.

[Shadoww702]

Prepare to get reamed in the negotiations for not giving your champion a rematch clause as part of his package.

That was pretty dumb. But even with a lose Leo or Frampton have my attention 1000%.

[Bardock]

Why? Because it should of been a draw.

Dude is acting like Frampton put on a FMJ masterclass. Shiiit is annoying AF

[Shadoww702]

Dude is acting like Frampton put on a FMJ masterclass. Shiiit is annoying AF

Yup! That was a GREAT fight. But to say one guy was better is DUMB!!! If they fought another 10x I wouldn't gamble on ANY of their fights by picking a winner.

[CaneloMaidana]

Framton has soo many better options right now than Cruz. Maybe down the line, I just see NO reason for Frampton to give this guy a rematch.

No way, Warrington and Selby are bigger fights but Santa Cruz vs Frampton in Vegas is his 3rd biggest fight.

[bojangles1987]

I would like to see a rematch eventually, if not immediately. The fight was too good and close to not do it again.