Ok, been following Farmer and the guys got the goods, he's only been boxing for 6 years so besides his High Ring IQ with that said obviously he's a natural for this. I remember a while back in an interview he mentioned Lomachenko was the best person he's ever sparred and gave him massive props......Now, sparring is only sparring and they've worked together a couple of times but that was a while ago, now that both have leveled up what so you guys think of a Lomachenko vs Farmer fight? Anyone you guys like in this one? I like them both so I could care less who wins as long as it's an entertaining fight.
Tevin Farmer vs Vasyl Lomachenko
Collapse
-
-
That's not fair....Lomachenko is definitely good, no bum, I think that word gets thrown around too easily, to me a bum is someone who isn't even ranked (or/plus other factors)...Lomachenko is definitely the goods. Farmer though is the goods definitely in my opinion....only been boxing for 6 years and has Ls on his record because of bad management early in his career.....his Ring IQ is incredible considering such a short time span in the game but hey skills are skills.....in this fight I can't see skills overtaking skills.....this should be a battle of wills.....and by will I don't mean pressure fighting. Tevin is slick and has high ring IQ and Loma has seen every style under the sun with such an extensive amateur record so styles don't confuse him.....I think this will boil down to a battle of who can impose their will on the other.....whoever wins I don't care, I like them bothComment
-
-
Yeah I wish Tevin could fight IBF champ Pedraza and Lomachenko could unify with Vargas then the winners fight. But HBO won't do business with Dibella since he's Haymon's biggest promoter.Comment
-
-
Farmer's losses aren't just on "bad management"
His first loss was to another guy making his debut (and is now 4-4) then lost to a guy with only two fights that is now 9-2. His other two losses he was in with those guys too soon, but not all his losses were bad managementComment
-
Farmer's losses aren't just on "bad management"
His first loss was to another guy making his debut (and is now 4-4) then lost to a guy with only two fights that is now 9-2. His other two losses he was in with those guys too soon, but not all his losses were bad management
Too soon because of bad management....his management shouldn't have put him in there that soon, as well as he was basically thrown to the wolves early, a combination of factors.....he learned on the jobComment
-
Comment
Comment