If Pac beats Crawford....do you place him above May in the TBE race?

[tangalog2200]

Nope....nothing to add to the list. Why would i want to add to the list? I will choose to stay on the topic. A injury that happens in a fight not brought on by a punch by either fighter that hinders the outcome or purity of the bout will bring forth controversy despite who wins or loses. Because unless its a draw...someone has to win and someone has to lose.

Gee maybe thats why another rule of if a injury happens before the 4th it can be declared a NC. or ND. So there is no winner. No controversy! But after that 4th round...Its official. Someone is gonna win or lose and the door to controversy is officially open if a injury happens outside of the fighters hands unless cause by a punch! Stay on topic. You cannot compare. A fact is a fact. I for one understand the definition of controversy and how it plays and has played so many rolls in the sport of Boxing. In the armatures as well as the pros.

ah, got burned with your beloved "that changes the purity of the match (In wich will also bring forth CONTROVERSY)"....

now let me go back to the list: comments added;

an injury changes the purity of the match!?.....diminish the win! controversial? not really

what more?

ah, cheating on the scales!? controversial? yes!

dictating the gloves of your opponent!? controversial? yes!

resorting to illegal or dirty tactics!? controversial? yes!

very bad score cards!? controversial? yes!

very incompetent or biased ref!? controversial? yes!

using peds!? controversial? yes!

i listed the above so you can review and relate the meaning of controversial properly...

[PACBOY]

I'll accept that you need to return to school and learn the difference between "except" and "accept."


Don't jump in the crossfire, junior. You're clearly not built for it.

Im not he one who got clearly butt fu/cked n this thread and throwing up memes and being a grammar police just like pacboy said you would. hahahahaha Whos the mad one? Dude you got ****d

[Mr. Anonymous]

Im not he one who got clearly butt fu/cked n this thread and throwing up memes and being a grammar police just like pacboy said you would. hahahahaha Whos the mad one? Dude you got ****d

thats an understatement buddy

[Mr. Anonymous]

ah, got burned with your beloved "that changes the purity of the match (In wich will also bring forth CONTROVERSY)"....

now let me go back to the list: comments added;

an injury changes the purity of the match!?.....diminish the win! controversial? not really

what more?

ah, cheating on the scales!? controversial? yes!

dictating the gloves of your opponent!? controversial? yes!

resorting to illegal or dirty tactics!? controversial? yes!

very bad score cards!? controversial? yes!

very incompetent or biased ref!? controversial? yes!

using peds!? controversial? yes!

i listed the above so you can review and relate the meaning of controversial properly...

Can you elaborate a little on what the point is youre driving at? I saw a while back in the the trad what PB was saying. But i dont know what the point you are getting at or point you are trying to make.

[travestyny]

Im not he one who got clearly butt fu/cked n this thread and throwing up memes and being a grammar police just like pacboy said you would. hahahahaha Whos the mad one? Dude you got ****d

Correction. You are the one running to the aid of Pac Boy after he got handled. It's not hard to tell.

The only thing hard to tell is if you are an alt or if you just like sucking his c*ck. Either way, you jumped in with nothing to add, and you played yourself. You need to get back to class, junior. Let me give you some things to focus on.

Apostrophes
articles
punctuation

Now if you'd like to continue, you can respond on the merits of my post. I dare you. If you're only here to suck off PacBoy, well, that's on you.

[tangalog2200]

damn. I just read through this and oh my god you have Kod two posters at once. They tried PB they tried

let me make it read better:

"I just read through this though i found it too difficult to fathom and oh my god you have two teachers at once. They tried PB (PB as punching bag) they tried"

[PACBOY]

Correction. You are the one running to the aid of Pac Boy after he got handled. It's not hard to tell.

The only thing hard to tell is if you are an alt or if you just like sucking his c*ck. Either way, you jumped in with nothing to add, and you played yourself. You need to get back to class, junior. Let me give you some things to focus on.

Apostrophes
articles
punctuation

Now if you'd like to continue, you can respond on the merits of my post. I dare you. If you're only here to suck off PacBoy, well, that's on you.

awwww did getting ****d in this thread by pacboy get you upset wittle girl? Looks like youre the only one sucking off pacboy right now. You mad because he stuffed your mouth full of E-di(k! hahahahahaha
woot woot grammar police Be on the look out for a travesty getting ****d Im out say hello to your daddy pacboy for me hahahahahah

[Mr. Anonymous]

let me make it read better:

"I just read through this though i found it too difficult to fathom and oh my god you have two teachers at once. They tried PB (PB as punching bag) they tried"

Do you even know what the hell your talking about?

[travestyny]

awwww did getting ****d in this thread by pacboy get you upset wittle girl? Looks like youre the only one sucking off pacboy right now. You mad because he stuffed your mouth full of E-di(k! hahahahahaha
woot woot grammar police Be on the look out for a travesty getting ****d Im out say hello to your daddy pacboy for me hahahahahah

Ohhhh, I get it.

You clowns sit around in the Green K thread together all day in a perpetual circle jerk. Is that it? That's why you're so butt hurt that your buddy is getting handled, huh?


lol! Maybe you should try getting a life, bro. Those green squares aint gonna do much for you, you know?

Me mad? I'm having a good time. You're trying to protect the dude that's getting smashed around this thread. There's nothing that's gonna change that. He's going to continue getting smashed around. If you want to help him, try responding on the merits of the topic we are discussing. Can you handle that?

Question 1: Was the Mayweather/Pacquiao fight controversial due to Pacquaio's injury sustained in the fight?

Question 2: Was the Pacquiao/Bradley 2 fight controversial due to Bradley's injury sustained in the fight.

Can you handle that?

[tangalog2200]

Can you elaborate a little on what the point is youre driving at? I saw a while back in the the trad what PB was saying. But i dont know what the point you are getting at or point you are trying to make.

please re-read and understand the last sentence....

i just wonder why on post #255 you seem to already have a grasp on the on-going convo....or did i get this wrong?