Comments Thread For: Roach: If He's 100%, Pacquiao Would Destroy Floyd Mayweather!

[Metho_4u]

That's all your worth. I don't need to elaborate what is so clear already. I've explained it thoroughly. Your brain doesn't have the capacity to get it. You just need to read it over and over until it sinks in dumbass.

Lol, no. You've got pre-prepared speeches on all this because you can't get over a fighter losing...it's very pathetic. Did you call that crisis hotline I posted for you yet?

[cork]

When there is smoke there is fire..

Nothing was concluded that night.. Nothing..

Except the true winner was robbed.




Wrestle mania happened that night slash marathon event slash hugathon event.

Been ignoring your post because all you do is spam the same **** but for some reason I just watched that video and you might be right I might have to go watch the fight again, but your beating a dead horse man just let it go. You spamming the forums with the same thing over and over again isn't gonna change Pac or Floyds record in the books. It's almost as obnoxious as these guys who spam hate threads about GGG.

I did think he lost the fight but it wasn't as wide as the commentators made it out to be. I normally watch my fight on mute so I don't get influence by the commentators but I was at party and they had that **** on surround sound and I remember I was thinking wtf were these commentators talking about because I didn't agree with a lot they said.

I do want to see a rematch because I do believe Pac was injured and I can see why Pac thought he won the fight. You don't happen to have the full fight somewhere because I can't find it on youtube.

[MPX309]

Been ignoring your post because all you do is spam the same **** but for some reason I just watched that video and you might be right I might have to go watch the fight again, but your beating a dead horse man just let it go. You spamming the forums with the same thing over and over again isn't gonna change Pac or Floyds record in the books. It's almost as obnoxious as these guys who spam hate threads about GGG.

I did think he lost the fight but it wasn't as wide as the commentators made it out to be. I normally watch my fight on mute so I don't get influence by the commentators but I was at party and they had that **** on surround sound and I remember I was thinking wtf were these commentators talking about because I didn't agree with a lot they said.

I do want to see a rematch because I do believe Pac was injured and I can see why Pac thought he won the fight. You don't happen to have the full fight somewhere because I can't find it on youtube.

Yeah, that goddam Lampley, he's so biased towards Mayweather lol

[Metho_4u]

Why do all of the sore losers look at punch stats only? There's many other criteria for the scoring system. I'm just still not sure what some people watched.

[Spoon23]

Been ignoring your post because all you do is spam the same **** but for some reason I just watched that video and you might be right I might have to go watch the fight again, but your beating a dead horse man just let it go. You spamming the forums with the same thing over and over again isn't gonna change Pac or Floyds record in the books. It's almost as obnoxious as these guys who spam hate threads about GGG.

.

Yup, I am. Took you awhile.. but the truth is there, I'm not trying to change who won that fight. I am only trying to tell you if Floyd's win was a deserving win. And the answer to that is a big fat NO. With all the controversy that is surrounding it. Floyd didnt deserve a single dime from that fight, more so 200 million for turning a boxing event into a marathon track meet.

As you have watched it, it took you this long to press the trigger of truth. If you stumble upon it again, it's not for you to read it anymore, but the thousands that haven't seen it. It's for them.

I have an epic detailed round by round thread that will much more open your eyes of the biggest sports heist in history, not just boxing mind you. The biggest scam in all sports. The real winner was short changed, and video evidence shows the one who connected more was and is forever more Pac, it cannot be disputed 'till the end of time.

95,000 viewers of NSB have seen it. It will just get larger by the day..

Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

link: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=695333

[Spoon23]

I do want to see a rematch because I do believe Pac was injured and I can see why Pac thought he won the fight. You don't happen to have the full fight somewhere because I can't find it on youtube.

Yes he was, a one armed man, half a man that Pac was took an IV ridden floyd to deep waters and made him run and hug for dear life. Imagine a healthy Pac. It's a very scary thought.

My link has a round by round video coverage. I hope that will suffice.

95000 NSB viewers have seen it.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=695333

Duran knows there is unfinished business between the 2.

Now that pac has a healed shoulder. He knows Pac can win it convincingly.

@ 1:00

[Spoon23]

Why do all of the sore losers look at punch stats only? There's many other criteria for the scoring system. I'm just still not sure what some people watched.

This is the hurt business, In the Pros, the name of the game is dish out pain.

Punching to connect is the name of the game in boxing. I have shown proof Pac connected the more clean and effective punching that night, not to mention the more punches per rounds in this fight. (Go to page 1 all there)

That said. To have effective aggression, you have to hit your opponent with clean effective punching, more so than your opponent per round. - Pac did

Ring generalship- ring generalship is he who controls the center of the ring and controls his opponent to place him were he wants him to be and while doing that landing the more effective blows than his opponent. - Pac again did that. He commanded the center of the ring pushed Floyd back whenever he wants to over and over to the ropes for 12 rounds while doing so also landed the cleaner more effective punches.

Defense- defense is to not get hit, so who did get hit more throughout the fight? As I have proven in this thread Floyd got hit more per round. Shows who's defense had more holes.

Clean and effective punching: It means those punches landed with intent and the gravity of the punches is how you measure it's significance per round.

Even if you have aggression if you can't hit your opponent effectively your aggression is not an effective aggression.

Even if your ring generalship, but you can't land effectively on your opponent then your ring generalship ain't that great.

Defense, if you get hit more than your opponent. Then your defense is weaker than your opponent.

You cannot have good ring generalship, good defense, effective aggression if you hit less than your opponent.

Pac did that with flying colors. He Landed the significant punches, landed the cleaner more effective punches and above all landed the more punches.

I've shown proof landed the more significant punches per rounds that were disputed. showed proof who was the ring general, effective aggressor, and who had the better defense that night is the one who got hit less by his opponent. All Pacquiao.

# videos don't lie

The one who commanded the center of the ring and placed Floyd where he wanted him to be is the guy wearing yellow trunks.




Here is round 3, full punch connects of the whole 3 minute round. Judges gave it to Floyd when it is obviously a Pac round.

[Metho_4u]

This is the hurt business, In the Pros, the name of the game is dish out pain.

Punching to connect is the name of the game in boxing. I have shown proof Pac connected the more clean and effective punching that night, not to mention the more punches per rounds in this fight. (Go to page 1 all there)

That said. To have effective aggression, you have to hit your opponent with clean effective punching, more so than your opponent per round. - Pac did

Ring generalship- ring generalship is he who controls the center of the ring and controls his opponent to place him were he wants him to be and while doing that landing the more effective blows than his opponent. - Pac again did that. He commanded the center of the ring pushed Floyd back whenever he wants to over and over to the ropes for 12 rounds while doing so also landed the cleaner more effective punches.

Defense- defense is to not get hit, so who did get hit more throughout the fight? As I have proven in this thread Floyd got hit more per round. Shows who's defense had more holes.

Clean and effective punching: It means those punches landed with intent and the gravity of the punches is how you measure it's significance per round.

Even if you have aggression if you can't hit your opponent effectively your aggression is not an effective aggression.

Even if your ring generalship, but you can't land effectively on your opponent then your ring generalship ain't that great.

Defense, if you get hit more than your opponent. Then your defense is weaker than your opponent.

You cannot have good ring generalship, good defense, effective aggression if you hit less than your opponent.

Pac did that with flying colors. He Landed the significant punches, landed the cleaner more effective punches and above all landed the more punches.

I've shown proof landed the more significant punches per rounds that were disputed. showed proof who was the ring general, effective aggressor, and who had the better defense that night is the one who got hit less by his opponent. All Pacquiao.

# videos don't lie

The one who commanded the center of the ring and placed Floyd where he wanted him to be is the guy wearing yellow trunks.




Here is round 3, full punch connects of the whole 3 minute round. Judges gave it to Floyd when it is obviously a Pac round.

Floyd made Manny fight his fight, Manny complained about it afterward. Manny failed to cut the ring off, failed to fight his fight, failed to keep Floyd on the ropes, or in corners, Floyd pivoted and hit Manny with left hooks multiple times. Was it 118-110? No. Did Floyd win? Yes, he did. He made the money, and there's nothing you or anyone who hates Floyd can do about that.

[Spoon23]

Floyd made Manny fight his fight, Manny complained about it afterward. Manny failed to cut the ring off, failed to fight his fight, failed to keep Floyd on the ropes, or in corners, Floyd pivoted and hit Manny with left hooks multiple times. Was it 118-110? No. Did Floyd win? Yes, he did. He made the money, and there's nothing you or anyone who hates Floyd can do about that.

If for all who think manny wasnt doing anything in the ring against floyd cause he didnt throw a **** ton of punches....there is a golden rule when you box someone like floyd....dont play his game. Floyd wants you to throw wasted punches. Manny studied floyd pretty smart imo cause a smart fighter knows when you got a runner who plays defense dont waste punches or your gonna punch yourself out.

That is what floyd banks on saving his best punches when he sees the other is tiri g out from all the punches that went nowhere. He had no choice to run, hug, headlock and all from manny....he wasting wasting a lot of his punches. As floyd hoped he would. Which is why manny kept up with him in stamina all 12 rounds, had floyd flurried in all 4 corners of the match and rounds. His option was to hold him. Thats a smart but seriously lame tactic.

Floyds jabs thrown mostly in all his percetage hit pacs gloves...not face or body. But for some reason judges counted them as hits? Wtf? Manny was the aggressor in every round, landed the best shots, actually hit floyd with more better shots than floyd hit him. But again...pitty pats are counted for some odd reason. This is why floyd made sure it went to cards, it was gonna favor his pitty pat tactics even in illegal clench taps. He was even hittin him while ref was breakin them apart....ups you punch count. But if your tied.....you cant recoil.

There is many reasons why boxing is dieing as a sport of honorable pugilism and gone to $$ only. Whats a better way to make money then have a flawed boxer go lossless in hopes he will get knocked out? Nothing. Its a TMT and mgm money maker since blth are in league together. Floyd is a promoter. Makes the stipulations to fight him.

He was even shown with the crazy negotiations for this fight to happen which took many turns cause of his off stipulations. Facts. The deeper you dive into the history of this fight, floyd as a fighter ( remember he is only lossless when became a paid pro, he got 6 losses as an amature) and how the way the boxing scene is been set up over the last 7 years you will see why folks are pissed, why he catches a lot of negative feedback from fans of boxing , and also...most folks dont flack him especially certain ex boxers and celebs cause they placed high wagers on the fight in favor of floyd. If you look at the percentage of who was gonna win the fight before the fight and during....Pac was then the odds on fav. So whoever bet floyd would bank big time. Its a lot of ****ery with this fight so before casting opinions on either side fighters, look at it from a different perspective then the true conclusion will unfold.

Pac beat him at his own game. Pac countered the counter puncher.

Pac>Floyd all day everyday

[Metho_4u]

Is that why roach himself said he lost?