Comments Thread For: Loeffler: As Soon as Golovkin Has a Fight, Everyone Wants Him!

[Sweet_Science2]

FMD, you are thick

Loeffler said GGG would be willing to fight Degale but that doesnt mean that Hearn or Haymon wants him to

DeGale has a unification fight lined up with Jack PLUS a fight with Callum Smith (another Hearn fighter btw) after that

Why would they **** up 2 massive fights for the sake of one?

And btw, the last time DeGale was asked about GGG, he said he'd be happy to fight him AFTER unifying

Idiot

Get your dyck riding ass outta here. Brook was in deep Negotiations with Vargas and all of a sudden the pussie g fight is out there. James could beat the shyt out of pussie g in September and fight Jack in December or late November like his next fight might be anyway.

You are a fuucking pussie ass fanboy. pussie g took the pussie route period. Brook was in negotiations with Vargas and James CLEARLY still doesn't have a fight signed or announced and that Brook vs pussie g fight got announced almost THREE weeks ago.

Both fighters where on the table and had POTENTIAL opponents in their division. Loeffler confirmed that they would have fought DeGale at 168 but only AFTER they finally signed to fight Brook. Straight ******* and you have pussie g's dyck all in your mouth. You are not a fan of the sport but a fuucking fanboy to defend this bull shyt fight like this was the ONLY option for September or in the UK you fuucking dyck head

[Kigali]

Get your dyck riding ass outta here. Brook was in deep Negotiations with Vargas and all of a sudden the pussie g fight is out there. James could beat the shyt out of pussie g in September and fight Jack in December or late November like his next fight might be anyway.

You are a fuucking pussie ass fanboy. pussie g took the pussie route period. Brook was in negotiations with Vargas and James CLEARLY still doesn't have a fight signed or announced and that Brook vs pussie g fight got announced almost THREE weeks ago.

Both fighters where on the table and had POTENTIAL opponents in their division. Loeffler confirmed that they would have fought DeGale at 168 but only AFTER they finally signed to fight Brook. Straight ******* and you have pussie g's dyck all in your mouth. You are not a fan of the sport but a fuucking fanboy to defend this bull shyt fight like this was the ONLY option for September or in the UK you fuucking dyck head

Amen Amen

If GGG is so good you'd think his fans would raise the bar...you'd think they'd want to see him tested.

[Sweet_Science2]

Now you're going full psycho on me. You're talking about options when GGG had none. Look, if you're a boxing fan, you wouldn't bring up any of those guys...Ward blocked the fight as soon as he signed that deal with HBO, Lara is not even advising his team to make the fight (though he might get his wish in December if everybody ducks him again), DeGale (for whatever reason) decided not to put his name in when GGG was looking for a UK fighter (& don't make like Hearn controls him because Haymon calls all the shots on DeGale; if anyone gets scorn over this, it's Haymon), of the two Dirrell brothers only Andre Dirrell was a viable option (because of their Olympics history) but he's not a draw in the UK, & Andrade isn't even thinking about fighting any 160's until he's regained his world status at 154 (in his own words since he was stripped of his belt). And let's get this straight about DeGale: Loeffler's words were "it was unfortunate the DeGale fight wasn't made." Translation: they tried to get DeGale but was turned down. Of the fighers you named, only DeGale was a viable option for a September fight in London. But for whatever reason, DeGale wasn't ready to give up on the Jack unification just to take GGG fight (which puts more pressure on DeGale's team to make the Jack fight). So really, the fighters you brought up were not viable options for a September fight in London. And if you're going to say f#ck fighting in London, then you're asking GGG & his team to make a smaller money-making event just to satisfy critics like you...that's what you're saying: "K2, put GGG in a lesser money event so I can be satisfied (even though I won't pay for anything involving GGG)." You're trying to tell a promotional company to make the event that makes less money if you're giving them no other title-attaining matches. That's what you're doing. At some point you have be reasonable.

The possible boxing opponent for GGG had to be a viable option in the UK...otherwise they have to scrap the whole thing & start all over, perhaps wasting another month with GGG on the shelf. You're asking too much, too much. What were you going to say next? That GGG fight Tony Bellew instead?

You seem to have so much time to toss hate around. But where's your scorn for Rigo, who is a champion but has no drawing power (& often asks for too much of the purse)? Where's your scorn for Stevenson, who hasn't defended his belt against someone quality since 2014? Or better yet, where's your scorn for Lara, who hasn't defended his 154 belt against ANYBODY quality (can't count Canelo because his belt wasn't on the line against him)? You have so much scorn for GGG...& i'm starting to suspect it's because you don't have anyone else to attack. Nobody cares about those other guys. But everyone here cares what happens to GGG. Are you being hateful?...or jealous?

You can keep calling me names if you don't want to understand all this. So go ahead. Let the insults fly. We both know that it does nothing to help your argument.

pussie g is a bytch period. You keep saying he didn't have anybody to fight when Loeffler CLEARLY said they would have fought DeGale at 168 but chose Brook like the f@ggots they are. You keep saying the same shyt to try and defend pussie g. Brook at 160? DeGale at 168? pussie g and team chose Brook at 160. Nothing you can say all the dyck sucking can't change the fact that pussie g brought Brook from 147 to 160 period. How in the hell is the helpful for unifying? LMAO pussie g is the biggest fraud I;ve ever seen

[Sweet_Science2]

Amen Amen

If GGG is so good you'd think his fans would raise the bar...you'd think they'd want to see him tested.

Exactly lol... These dudes do not want pussie g to step up. They shyt on Lara, or Ward when they call pussie g out. But defend the garbage fights. pussie g is one loss away from being tossed in the back for the the hype job he is.

[JUNIABOY]

pussie g is a bytch period. You keep saying he didn't have anybody to fight when Loeffler CLEARLY said they would have fought DeGale at 168 but chose Brook like the f@ggots they are. You keep saying the same shyt to try and defend pussie g. Brook at 160? DeGale at 168? pussie g and team chose Brook at 160. Nothing you can say all the dyck sucking can't change the fact that pussie g brought Brook from 147 to 160 period. How in the hell is the helpful for unifying? LMAO pussie g is the biggest fraud I;ve ever seen

That's totally not what Loeffler said. You're just making stuff up now. And Brook signed the contract intended for Eubank Jr...it was basically an unaltered contract where the only thing they did was white out Eubank's name for Brook. And if we're talking about repeating the same tired arguments, your arguments never change. Most of it is insults. But you go on rants about GGG this or GGG that all the time...no substance, just hate. DeGale was not available to GGG for a September 10 fight in London. How much more clear can I be on that?! Are you a promoter now?...you know all the ins & outs of all the promoters involved?...so you're the one who can say if a promoter is being reliable or not? Get the f#ck outta here with that. The same information that's available to me is available to you. How about you watch that press conference video for once?

[JUNIABOY]

Amen Amen

If GGG is so good you'd think his fans would raise the bar...you'd think they'd want to see him tested.

That's a ****** comment. Why wouldn't fans of GGG want him to be tested? You know, that's only possible if quality opponents aren't ducking GGG, right? Do GGG critics even realize how highly publicized that duck was for Eubank Jr?

[Sweet_Science2]

That's totally not what Loeffler said. You're just making stuff up now. And Brook signed the contract intended for Eubank Jr...it was basically an unaltered contract where the only thing they did was white out Eubank's name for Brook. And if we're talking about repeating the same tired arguments, your arguments never change. Most of it is insults. But you go on rants about GGG this or GGG that all the time...no substance, just hate. DeGale was not available to GGG for a September 10 fight in London. How much more clear can I be on that?! Are you a promoter now?...you know all the ins & outs of all the promoters involved?...so you're the one who can say if a promoter is being reliable or not? Get the f#ck outta here with that. The same information that's available to me is available to you. How about you watch that press conference video for once?

So they couldn't put DeGales name in that contract instead of Brook and just add an 8 pound weight stipulation? Remember Rosado did that for pussie g and went up all the way to 160 when at first it was a catch weight fight.

pussie g and team ducked DeGale and chose Brook. I know it hurts your heart your in love with a pussie ass fraud who is a hype job. But truth is truth. If they could have just put Brooks name in then they could have did the same for James.

DAMN I Bodied you LMAO... pussie g be great duck James and bring up a welterweight's.

[JUNIABOY]

So they couldn't put DeGales name in that contract instead of Brook and just add an 8 pound weight stipulation? Remember Rosado did that for pussie g and went up all the way to 160 when at first it was a catch weight fight.

pussie g and team ducked DeGale and chose Brook. I know it hurts your heart your in love with a pussie ass fraud who is a hype job. But truth is truth. If they could have just put Brooks name in then they could have did the same for James.

DAMN I Bodied you LMAO... pussie g be great duck James and bring up a welterweight's.

You were arguing why Brook couldn't get a CW instead of fighting at 160. And I said, because the contract they offered Eubank Jr was mainly unaltered when they gave it to Kell Brook. And if Brook signed on for a 160 fight, shouldn't you be more mad at Brook? Where's your anger for Brook for participating in this mismatch? Or does your anger only focus on 1 fighter?

Your reasoning doesn't work for promoters. You think they can do whatever the heck they want in handing out contracts. That's what you think. The contract has to be agreed upon by both sides. Otherwise, no one is getting a fight. Promoters cannot do whatever they want unless they're such a big A-side that it doesn't matter what feedback the other side has. And that's not the case here.

And you still want to bring up DeGale? A guy who wasn't really available for September anyway?...you would prefer DeGale give up his negotiations with Jack's team for a unification fight just so critics like you, who won't buy the fight, can be satisfied? It's like you don't know or don't care that other fighters have other priorities & plans. You're as clueless as Alicia Silverstone.

[Sweet_Science2]

You were arguing why Brook couldn't get a CW instead of fighting at 160. And I said, because the contract they offered Eubank Jr was mainly unaltered when they gave it to Kell Brook. And if Brook signed on for a 160 fight, shouldn't you be more mad at Brook? Where's your anger for Brook for participating in this mismatch? Or does your anger only focus on 1 fighter?

Your reasoning doesn't work for promoters. You think they can do whatever the heck they want in handing out contracts. That's what you think. The contract has to be agreed upon by both sides. Otherwise, no one is getting a fight. Promoters cannot do whatever they want unless they're such a big A-side that it doesn't matter what feedback the other side has. And that's not the case here.

And you still want to bring up DeGale? A guy who wasn't really available for September anyway?...you would prefer DeGale give up his negotiations with Jack's team for a unification fight just so critics like you, who won't buy the fight, can be satisfied? It's like you don't know or don't care that other fighters have other priorities & plans. You're as clueless as Alicia Silverstone.

You clearly are the #1 pussie g fanboy. Congratulations. WHEN the fuuck was I arguing for Brook to get a catch weight?? I was clowning pussie g for fighting a WELTERWEIGHT at 160 instead of fighting LARA or DeGale you dumb ass.

Brook was in deep negotiations with Vargas that didn't stop the pussie g fight from happening in September. THREE weeks later does DeGale have fight signed and or announced???????? OK then he was available dumb ass.

I already killed you in this! Should I be mad at Brook? LMAO Brook is the one going up two divisions he is taking ALL the risks you fuucking idiot something PUSSIE g would never do. Hence the name PUSSIE g.

LMAO I'm done fanboy hahahaha

[JUNIABOY]

You clearly are the #1 pussie g fanboy. Congratulations. WHEN the fuuck was I arguing for Brook to get a catch weight?? I was clowning pussie g for fighting a WELTERWEIGHT at 160 instead of fighting LARA or DeGale you dumb ass.

Brook was in deep negotiations with Vargas that didn't stop the pussie g fight from happening in September. THREE weeks later does DeGale have fight signed and or announced???????? OK then he was available dumb ass.

I already killed you in this! Should I be mad at Brook? LMAO Brook is the one going up two divisions he is taking ALL the risks you fuucking idiot something PUSSIE g would never do. Hence the name PUSSIE g.

LMAO I'm done fanboy hahahaha

My bad for getting you confused with someone else. But that doesn't make my arguments any less valid.

You keep insisting that GGG fight Lara or DeGale. But let me ask you this: were you okay with GGG/Eubank Jr? Because if you were, then your anger should be directed straight at Eubank for the GGG/Brook mismatch.

And it's been asked before: are you really serious that DeGale should abandon unifying against Jack just so he can fight GGG? That could possibly put his unification bid at danger. You're basically saying that DeGale abandon his career goals just so GGG critics like you can be satisfied. That's what you're saying. You simply have no regards for any other boxer, do you? Let's have the clear SMW champion abandon his own career goal just so you can be satisfied? The ego on you. There was no one closer to DeGale's situation then Hearn, & Hearn offered Brook...so, in that sense, shouldn't you be mad at Hearn as well? K2 didn't specifically request Brook...Hearn offered him.

And Lara was never going to be a viable opponent in the UK. You can't keep pressing that matchup despite it not making sense for a September fight in the UK. If Lara was a bigger draw, then maybe you'd have a case. But as it stands, the guy can't even fill up a venue in his own backyard. A fight with Lara makes more sense in MSG, rather than O2 Arena.

You keep insisting that GGG cherry-picked Brook. But in order to cherry pick, you need OPTIONS. GGG clearly has none. His team was at the mercy of Hearn to produce a British fighter. Otherwise, they would have had to scrap the whole UK event & made a lesser-money event in the US. GGG/Brook is a mismatch, not a cherry pick. Next thing you're going to say is that Wade was a cherry pick. Ha!

Look, if GGG was a huge ppv draw like FMJ, then finding opponents wouldn't be a problem. But as it stands, GGG's drawing power can barely hold FMJ's shoes, let alone fill them. So they can't entice every viable opponent to take the big money fight with him. It's good money. It's just not big money. That's why they had to settle for a mismatch. If you don't want to see the logic, that's on you.