[Write-up I Did At BloodyElbow.com, Feedback and Discussion Welcomed]
If you aren’t that into boxing, you might have missed it. The mainstream hype was minimal. I couldn’t find a place in town that was showing it. Terence Crawford. Maybe you’ve heard the name? Then again, maybe you haven’t. If you just so happened to tune in Saturday night to watch him unify the WBO and WBC junior welterweight titles, odds are that you will remember it from now on.
Shortly after a UFC event on Fox that saw Valentina Shevchenko upset Holly Holm in an absolute chess match between two of the most heralded strikers in mixed martial arts today, the early stages of an HBO Boxing pay-per-view began. The main event? A contest between the two universally regarded best junior welterweights on the planet: undefeated WBO champion Terence Crawford vs undefeated WBC champion Viktor Postol.
The hype was minimal – but the buzz among hardcore boxing enthusiasts was palpable. These were two special talents coming together at a special time in each of their respective careers.
Most expected a closely contested bout. It was not.
Depending on your perspective, Crawford’s near shutout of Postol was either the most masterfully executed performance of the year or the most boring "fight" you’ll ever see. There doesn’t appear to be much middle ground. In this article I’m going to be exploring why I fall into the former category as opposed to the latter and, more importantly, we’re going to discuss how it is exactly that Crawford was able to take such an extremely talented boxer like Postol and make him look so ordinary.
A Tale of Two Counter Punchers
If you’ve seen Postol fight in the past then you know that he is a fairly tall, rangy fighter for the weight class and that his style matches accordingly. He has somewhat of a reputation as a counter puncher, though he often utilizes his impressive footwork to outmaneuver opponents while stinging them with his piston-like jab. An incredibly jab-centric boxer, his entire game is based around the consistency and effectiveness of said jab. He often uses it to touch opponents, pawing at them to measure the distance before hammering home a more powerful follow-up jab or straight right. Cautious jabs and 1-2’s slowly develop into combinations as the rounds progress. What started as pitter patter quickly becomes much, much more. But it all starts with the jab.
Crawford on the other hand is a bit of a problem solver. A true counter fighter speckled with shades of the occasional all-out offensive flurry, his greatest strength is perhaps his versatility. Amazing footwork coupled with speed; he is both a technically proficient boxer and a big puncher. Creativity is one of his foremost weapons. And in this fight it was Crawford’s creativity that was on display as he solved the riddle of Postol’s aforementioned prowess as a prolific jabber.
If you aren’t that into boxing, you might have missed it. The mainstream hype was minimal. I couldn’t find a place in town that was showing it. Terence Crawford. Maybe you’ve heard the name? Then again, maybe you haven’t. If you just so happened to tune in Saturday night to watch him unify the WBO and WBC junior welterweight titles, odds are that you will remember it from now on.
Shortly after a UFC event on Fox that saw Valentina Shevchenko upset Holly Holm in an absolute chess match between two of the most heralded strikers in mixed martial arts today, the early stages of an HBO Boxing pay-per-view began. The main event? A contest between the two universally regarded best junior welterweights on the planet: undefeated WBO champion Terence Crawford vs undefeated WBC champion Viktor Postol.
The hype was minimal – but the buzz among hardcore boxing enthusiasts was palpable. These were two special talents coming together at a special time in each of their respective careers.
Most expected a closely contested bout. It was not.
Depending on your perspective, Crawford’s near shutout of Postol was either the most masterfully executed performance of the year or the most boring "fight" you’ll ever see. There doesn’t appear to be much middle ground. In this article I’m going to be exploring why I fall into the former category as opposed to the latter and, more importantly, we’re going to discuss how it is exactly that Crawford was able to take such an extremely talented boxer like Postol and make him look so ordinary.
A Tale of Two Counter Punchers
If you’ve seen Postol fight in the past then you know that he is a fairly tall, rangy fighter for the weight class and that his style matches accordingly. He has somewhat of a reputation as a counter puncher, though he often utilizes his impressive footwork to outmaneuver opponents while stinging them with his piston-like jab. An incredibly jab-centric boxer, his entire game is based around the consistency and effectiveness of said jab. He often uses it to touch opponents, pawing at them to measure the distance before hammering home a more powerful follow-up jab or straight right. Cautious jabs and 1-2’s slowly develop into combinations as the rounds progress. What started as pitter patter quickly becomes much, much more. But it all starts with the jab.
Crawford on the other hand is a bit of a problem solver. A true counter fighter speckled with shades of the occasional all-out offensive flurry, his greatest strength is perhaps his versatility. Amazing footwork coupled with speed; he is both a technically proficient boxer and a big puncher. Creativity is one of his foremost weapons. And in this fight it was Crawford’s creativity that was on display as he solved the riddle of Postol’s aforementioned prowess as a prolific jabber.
Comment