Does it annoy you when ******ed boxing fans

[Teetotaler]

say "oh yeah i watched the fight for the second time but this time with mute and so and so actually won. They were just on the other guys sack the entire time and were so biased"? Its like these idiots dont even have eyes, as if they're facing the tv with they're eyes closed listening to the commentators. As if its the fu cking 50's when people used to hear fights on the radio when a tv wasnt available. Seriously brah..

[Lester Tutor]

nah. most of us at NSB can score in realtime as a collective per usual. stay true to the point system and if there are any major inconsistencies then it's what you call a robbery. don't need to watch something twice or in SLOW MOTION...

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

alot of people here DKSAB and alot of people here are racially motiviated or has vandetta against other posters where they willingly turn the blinders on and say whatever to suit their agenda. I dont believe anyone watchest the fight again on mute lmfao, other than those who do like youtube videos and analyzes on it.

[MPX309]

No, Sometimes it takes a second viewing to get the emotion subsided and to have a more open mind. I don't turn the sound down or stuff like that. . . but what annoys me is when someone says "I've been watching boxing for 20 years" or whatever. Listen buddy, Skip Bayless has probably been watching boxing longer than me too, he still DKSAB

[Sugar Adam Ali]

say "oh yeah i watched the fight for the second time but this time with mute and so and so actually won. They were just on the other guys sack the entire time and were so biased"? Its like these idiots dont even have eyes, as if they're facing the tv with they're eyes closed listening to the commentators. As if its the fu cking 50's when people used to hear fights on the radio when a tv wasnt available. Seriously brah..

Yeah I hate that,,,


The judges literally get to see things once and sometimes from a bad angle.. These fanboys have HD slow mo replays

[Larry the boss]

They create their own reality

[juggernaut666]

Bumping this thread to show how false it is .

Most people saw an ENTIRE different fight with Pac vs Horn with different commentary on two separate networks !

The fight was reviewed by a panel of judges with NO sound and they got the score correct at least the right winner .

This was only ONE fight .....IF fights were reviewed by the same method there would be MANY unhappy fans on here . No sound obviously would let you watch a fight clearer no matter who disagrees with that .The brain for MOST is easy to influence ....one study was made where a group of subjects were put in a room and were decieved into thinking a complete staight line had a curve in it .

This also explains why boxing fans think boxing skills have declined and some eras are invincible bc they dont actually follow reality MOST of the time .

Using myself as example i just watched the Klitchko /Joshus fight on HD and no sound ...i now had Klitchko up by 2 rnds going into the 11th . When despite watching it multiple times i had Joshua up a rnd . Not that this matters bc Joshua scored a 7/10 rnd there and had the 12th to finish.

[Scary]

People who only watched the fight once, and stay diehard true to whatever opinion they have, they are the problem.

For the rest of us, we go back to reaccess the situation. Many a time, I have remembered something that turned out to be wrong second time around.

[Rockybigblower]

I wont even watch a fight if i know the result beforehand....let alone watch it a second time to make a review. I watch for the joy of the sport. I can certainly hold bias toward who i want to win...but thats why im not a judge. Im just a boxing fan for all its emotional ups and downs...not interested in the afterplay.

[steve j]

it is so annoying