I agree with you and every thing you've said is spot on.boxing is very predictable and all your picks have been right and I've made the same picks as you. So for you not to see lsc getting the win is LOL. Even if Frampton does "beat" LSC, do you think the judges will give it to him? Only way Frampton wins is by knock out or an undeniable Crawford type schooling, and we both know that's not happening.
Boxing is very predictable
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Controversial scores doesn't matter to me. What matters to me is the winner of the fight. But I think Frampton will win so convincingly that even the American judges will have to give him his deserved win.I agree with you and every thing you've said is spot on.boxing is very predictable and all your picks have been right and I've made the same picks as you. So for you not to see lsc getting the win is LOL. Even if Frampton does "beat" LSC, do you think the judges will give it to him? Only way Frampton wins is by knock out or an undeniable Crawford type schooling, and we both know that's not happening.Comment
-
The OP must been one rich dude from all the winings he got from his predictions....
The odds on his latest predictions, all 4 being correct (outcome only), are 35/1, does he have the balls to bet and post his slip on here...
Comment
-
Ward aint schooling nothing, and Frampton is gonna get outworked. Santa Cruz will run into problems once he faces a tough counter puncher. Donaire would have knocked him out a couple years ago. Walters would stop him. Frampton? He's made to slaughter. Bank on that. They aren't going to cash out on Santa Cruz yet.Thurman vs. Porter was regarded as an exciting fight. Well, I told you all, Thurman would win by decision. It was clear to anyone who knows boxing.
Crawford vs. Postol was regarded as an exciting fight. Well, I told you all, Crawford would win by decision. It was clear to anyone who knows boxing.
Likewise, it was clear that Wilder would beat Stiverne (and also Povetkin) and it was clear that Mayweather would beat Pacquiao and it was clear that Fury would beat Wladimir, who had just struggled with Bryant Jennings. People regard these fights as exciting because they don't know boxing.
People in here doubt my prediction skills, but let me give you a little gift, all you betters and oddsers in here.
Frampton will decision Santa Cruz. Ward will school Kovalev so badly in a UD that people will start saying that Kovalev was overrated all along. Those are two fights that the idiots regard as exciting, but who actual boxing fans can predict the outcome of before they happen. There is absolutely no shadow of doubt in my mind concerning those 2 results.
Oh, and Fury decisions Wladimir again and Glowacki decisions Usyk.Comment
-
Ward is too fast and skilled for Kovalev. Kovalev's skills are so limited, he was literally tripping over his own feet against Pascal. And he couldn't even stop an old slow Hopkins. How does he hope to handle a faster and more skilled version of Hopkins, especially if his only chance is to win by stoppage?Ward aint schooling nothing, and Frampton is gonna get outworked. Santa Cruz will run into problems once he faces a tough counter puncher. Donaire would have knocked him out a couple years ago. Walters would stop him. Frampton? He's made to slaughter. Bank on that. They aren't going to cash out on Santa Cruz yet.Comment
-
Comment
-
American's have put too much stock into Frampton's last two performances, especially the Gonzalez fight, where Frampton wasn't at his best, and Quigg is just a good kid, he is a good talented fighter with extreme levels of determination. Win or lose Santa Cruz has his hands full with Frampton.Ward aint schooling nothing, and Frampton is gonna get outworked. Santa Cruz will run into problems once he faces a tough counter puncher. Donaire would have knocked him out a couple years ago. Walters would stop him. Frampton? He's made to slaughter. Bank on that. They aren't going to cash out on Santa Cruz yet.Comment
-
Don't you ever get tired of bragging on your fight predicting skills? Mayweather was a 2 to 1 favorite to win, Crawford was a 5 to 1 favorite to win and Thurman was a 2 to 1 favorite to win. If you picked the winners of these fights all you did was pick guys who were heavily favored to win. Big ***ing deal. So what. That doesn't prove you know boxing or that you are the boxing expert you claim to be. Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back for picking the favorites just like most of of us did. Many of you Englishmen are big braggers just like your fighters. I assume you are from the UK to be picking Frampton to beat Santa Cruz. Frampton is the first underdog you have picked in advance to win. I think Santa Cruz has way to much ammunition for Frampton. Frampton won't be able to handle 100 or more good punches coming at him round after round. Santa Cruz will knock Frampton out. If Frampton wins I'll come back to give you full credit for your smart pick. If Frampton loses I'll come back to laugh at you for your ****** pick.Thurman vs. Porter was regarded as an exciting fight. Well, I told you all, Thurman would win by decision. It was clear to anyone who knows boxing.
Crawford vs. Postol was regarded as an exciting fight. Well, I told you all, Crawford would win by decision. It was clear to anyone who knows boxing.
Likewise, it was clear that Wilder would beat Stiverne (and also Povetkin) and it was clear that Mayweather would beat Pacquiao and it was clear that Fury would beat Wladimir, who had just struggled with Bryant Jennings. People regard these fights as exciting because they don't know boxing.
People in here doubt my prediction skills, but let me give you a little gift, all you betters and oddsers in here.
Frampton will decision Santa Cruz. Ward will school Kovalev so badly in a UD that people will start saying that Kovalev was overrated all along. Those are two fights that the idiots regard as exciting, but who actual boxing fans can predict the outcome of before they happen. There is absolutely no shadow of doubt in my mind concerning those 2 results.
Oh, and Fury decisions Wladimir again and Glowacki decisions Usyk.Comment
-
You act like even an old and slow Hopkins can be stopped. He knocked Hopkins down and had him hurt more than once. That tells me enough. He also won every round. So what if Pascal had him tripping over his feet. He maybe lost 2 of the rounds they fought in both fights.Ward is too fast and skilled for Kovalev. Kovalev's skills are so limited, he was literally tripping over his own feet against Pascal. And he couldn't even stop an old slow Hopkins. How does he hope to handle a faster and more skilled version of Hopkins, especially if his only chance is to win by stoppage?
Ward is not even that fast. He has above average speed. I'm telling you Ward wins because he is a crafty inside fighter and he has rough house tactics that guys like Kessler wanted no part of. It's not because he's some great boxer. He's a good outside boxer, and a great inside fighter.Comment
Comment