Comments Thread For: Ievgen Khytrov: I Want To Fight Gennady Golovkin, Take His Belts!

[Redd Foxx]

He might be a bit green at this point...

As I said earlier, he's slow and sloppy. Golovkin would beat him. But, I'm not talking about Golovkin there. I'm talking about the fans who make up ridiculous excuses as to why he's fighting a welter. There's 154, 160, and 168lbers who will give him a legit fight. Fighting Kell Brook is a cheap way to grab dollars form fans who are too ignorant to realize what a mismatch it is. Even slow Khytrov is more legit than fighting a guy who has had 1 decent fight, 2 weight classes below, and has never even fought at 154, let alone 160.

[CaneloMaidana]

He might be a bit green at this point...

He's 27 and had over 400 competitive fights. Khytrov would beat everyone Golovkin has ever fought.

[Jubei]

As I said earlier, he's slow and sloppy. Golovkin would beat him. But, I'm not talking about Golovkin there. I'm talking about the fans who make up ridiculous excuses as to why he's fighting a welter. There's 154, 160, and 168lbers who will give him a legit fight. Fighting Kell Brook is a cheap way to grab dollars form fans who are too ignorant to realize what a mismatch it is. Even slow Khytrov is more legit than fighting a guy who has had 1 decent fight, 2 weight classes below, and has never even fought at 154, let alone 160.

It's casuals and haters like you who shit on this fight for not knowing about boxing.

That fight is closer than Crawford vs Postol if you check out the casinos/bookmakers.

Brook is elite level, same as GGG, same as you guys weren't able do differentiate between Chilemba and Brand. "Oh Chilemba, never heard of him, never seen him, must be a bum doe". Fucking casuals.

Also you guys shit on GGG vs Brook but beg for GGG to move up 2 weight classes to fight Kovalev Ward winner. Exactly the same thing.

Double standards and hypocrisy.

Everything to discredit the fighter you desperately hate, because he, compared to the bunch of American inactive cowards and boring nobodies, is a star and a fan favorite, exciting and real fighter.

[Redd Foxx]

It's casuals and haters like you who shit on this fight for not knowing about boxing.

That fight is closer than Crawford vs Postol if you check out the casinos/bookmakers.

Brook is elite level, same as GGG, same as you guys weren't able do differentiate between Chilemba and Brand. "Oh Chilemba, never heard of him, never seen him, must be a bum doe". Fucking casuals.

Also you guys shit on GGG vs Brook but beg for GGG to move up 2 weight classes to fight Kovalev Ward winner. Exactly the same thing.

Double standards and hypocrisy.

Everything to discredit the fighter you desperately hate, because he, compared to the bunch of American inactive cowards and boring nobodies, is a star and a fan favorite, exciting and real fighter.

Didn't read because you are absolutely worthless.

[Eastcoast]

Khytrov unblock skills & power punches! #UkrainianBoxing pic.twitter.com/pNRgpflUIV

— UkraineAtamansBoxing (@UkraineAtamans) July 22, 2016

[jmrf4435]

Damn these tough as nails eastern euros are coming from everywhere in boxing!!

[jmrf4435]

"Khytrov unblock skills & power punches!"

I love guys that have little muscle tone but are strong as hell like Khytrov

[Derranged]

As I said earlier, he's slow and sloppy. Golovkin would beat him. But, I'm not talking about Golovkin there. I'm talking about the fans who make up ridiculous excuses as to why he's fighting a welter. There's 154, 160, and 168lbers who will give him a legit fight. Fighting Kell Brook is a cheap way to grab dollars form fans who are too ignorant to realize what a mismatch it is. Even slow Khytrov is more legit than fighting a guy who has had 1 decent fight, 2 weight classes below, and has never even fought at 154, let alone 160.

I'd take Khytrov over Brook, yes.

He's 27 and had over 400 competitive fights. Khytrov would beat everyone Golovkin has ever fought.

One, that's speculation. Two, even if he could beat Golovkin's opponents, that's not to say that Golovkin wouldn't smash him up, since Golovkin has done that to pretty much all of his other opponents.

Khytrov looks like he might have a bright future and throwing him in with Golovkin too soon could jeopardize that. But as I said above, I'd take him over Brook.

[CaneloMaidana]

It's casuals and haters like you who shit on this fight for not knowing about boxing.

That fight is closer than Crawford vs Postol if you check out the casinos/bookmakers.

Brook is elite level, same as GGG, same as you guys weren't able o differentiate between Chilemba and Brand. "Oh Chilemba, never heard of him, never seen him, must be a bum doe". Fucking casuals.

Also you guys shit on GGG vs Brook but beg for GGG to move up 2 weight classes to fight Kovalev Ward winner. Exactly the same thing.

Double standards and hypocrisy.

Everything to discredit the fighter you desperately hate, because he, compared to the bunch of American inactive cowards and boring nobodies, is a star and a fan favorite, exciting and real fighter.

Should Kovalev fight Rigo? I mean they are both elite, which according to you is all that matters.

[CaneloMaidana]

I'd take Khytrov over Brook, yes.



One, that's speculation. Two, even if he could beat Golovkin's opponents, that's not to say that Golovkin wouldn't smash him up, since Golovkin has done that to pretty much all of his other opponents.

Khytrov looks like he might have a bright future and throwing him in with Golovkin too soon could jeopardize that. But as I said above, I'd take him over Brook.

I'd love to Khytrov vs Rosado or Monroe. They won't be competitive but it'll pressure Golovkin to stop ducking.