Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin vs. Brook - WBA Has NOT Sanctioned as Title Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post
    No it isn't. Khan is far worse of a cherry pick. Khan isn't even a mention for top 3 welterweight. Compare that to Brook, and everyone agrees he's top 2.
    Khan got knocked out at lower weight classes, and moves up to fight a heavy handed man who weighs in 170 minimum fight night? Khan doesn't even weigh what Brook does. Brook has come in around 160 on fight nights before a few times. Khan had to bulk up and get slightly fatter to get close to that range.

    Enough of that bull****. Canelo weighs slightly more than Golovkin on fight night. It's been proven. He cuts more water weight and get's away with it because he's young. Just wait until he learns his body can't adjust to it as well when he ages.

    LOL, Lara. Lara who probably wants more money than he's worth. Yeah ****ing right. Make Golovkin take a huge cut in pay to fight a guy who brings no exposure? Absolutely ******ed. Difference between Canelo and Golovkin is none of the top middleweight's in Golovkin's division wanted to fight him. Canelo? He doesn't even talk about the top Jr. Middleweights. Big ****ing difference.

    If Canelo fought Khan at 160 I'd agree.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Santa_ View Post
      Ugh, Jacobs makes me sick right now. Can't believe he's taking the Mora rematch.
      Yeah he wasted a whole year after a huge spectacular win over Quillen, what a disappointment

      Comment


      • #23
        THEN DROP the belt Gennady!! Drop that sack of ****! WBC is all that matters!

        Comment


        • #24
          WBA makes no sense at all, they said IF by some miracle brook beat Glovokin, he wouldnt get the belt? WTF, if he beats the best middleweight in the world after being a B- level welterweight, then he sure as hell deserves the damn WBA trinket and then some. If he could beat GGG, Im sure he would have no problem defending the title against the cab drivers at 160 that GGGs been fighting.

          Comment


          • #25

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Deletrious View Post
              If the wba had forced Jacobs to negotiate or purse bid with Golovkin like they said they were going to, maybe we wouldn't have this fight.
              Right, the WBA was quick to make Andrade vs some guy no one knows and announce Thurman has 30 days to sign vs some guy who beat 400 year old Shane Mosley, but when it comes to Jacobs v Golovkin, nah, need more time.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Jsmooth9876 View Post
                He is and let's be honest if Canelo didn't back down we'd be seeing them fight in Sept. Or if Eubanks pops didn't wanna run the show we'd be seeing that fight. Or if Suanders had balls we'd be seeing that one. Canelo chose Khan because he had a name and was a easy win, he could have literally fought almost anyone from 147-160.
                So you are trying to give GGG a pass right??lol

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post
                  No it isn't. Khan is far worse of a cherry pick. Khan isn't even a mention for top 3 welterweight. Compare that to Brook, and everyone agrees he's top 2.
                  Khan got knocked out at lower weight classes, and moves up to fight a heavy handed man who weighs in 170 minimum fight night? Khan doesn't even weigh what Brook does. Brook has come in around 160 on fight nights before a few times. Khan had to bulk up and get slightly fatter to get close to that range.

                  Enough of that bull****. Canelo weighs slightly more than Golovkin on fight night. It's been proven. He cuts more water weight and get's away with it because he's young. Just wait until he learns his body can't adjust to it as well when he ages.

                  LOL, Lara. Lara who probably wants more money than he's worth. Yeah ****ing right. Make Golovkin take a huge cut in pay to fight a guy who brings no exposure? Absolutely ******ed. Difference between Canelo and Golovkin is none of the top middleweight's in Golovkin's division wanted to fight him. Canelo? He doesn't even talk about the top Jr. Middleweights. Big ****ing difference.
                  13 pounds vs 8. I've noticed Golovkin fans never say a word against him.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    WTF. WBA allows Jacobs to rematch Mora which does nothing to reinforce their "one belt per weight division" mantra; and then Brook doesn't get the MW belt if he beats Golovkin? WBA is vomit.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by CaneloMaidana View Post
                      13 pounds vs 8. I've noticed Golovkin fans never say a word against him.
                      You're right. Khan was 161 and Canelo probably around 174. 13 poundsish~.

                      http://www.************.com/2016/05/...o-must-180lbs/



                      Meanwhile, Golovkin will be about 170 vs Brook, whom will be probably 163-165. Stay mad. Canelo ducks the top fighters in his division, and his mandatory in Golovkin (even drops his belt).

                      Meanwhile, no top fighter at 160 will fight Golovkin. Stay mad, keep trying to equate them as the same scenario.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP