Why Pacquiao Always Need Rematches?

[Left Hook Tua]

I'd favour the Maidana that fought Mayweather over Bradley and the Marquez that knocked Pacquiao out. As for Morales, it's ridiculous you Pac turds keep hyping that win, he was one of the most weight drained fighters you'll ever see in the rematch and had lost to Raheem the fight before, garbage win.

Was maidana as good as bradley, morales, marquez, barrera?

Morales was weight drained third fight. Not 2nd.

Who cares if he lost to raheem? He might have lost to zahir at his absolute peak. Zahir is bigger and bad style matchup.

BTW you do realize that even older, shot morales hung in there with maidana a couple years before he fought Floyd right?

Shot Morales gave maidana a good fight.

[Robbie Barrett]

Was maidana as good as bradley, morales, marquez, barrera?

Morales was weight drained third fight. Not 2nd.

Who cares if he lost to raheem? He might have lost to zahir at his absolute peak. Zahir is bigger and bad style matchup.

BTW you do realize that even older, shot morales hung in there with maidana a couple years before he fought Floyd right?

Shot Morales gave maidana a good fight.

Weight drained Morales was worse than old Morales. As for saying he wasn't weight drained for the 2nd fight GTFO. It was well known he was struggling with 130 which is why he fought Raheem at 135, Morales wanted the Pacquiao rematch at 135 but Pacquiao refused.



Look at him...... looks so damn weak and sick.

Garbage win for Pacquiao, no credit should be given.

[hugh grant]

Pac didnt really need to rematch Barrera. He beat him well, but cos his fights are exciting it warrants rematch. Pac didnt really need to rematch cotto at 154, but people wanted Cotto to have a better chance or wanted Pac to lose? So why dont floyd offer rematches to his opponents at their best weight to give them a better chance in rematch? Because he likes things in his favour thats why

Floyds excuse to not rematch is that his fights are boring and nobody wants to see it again. I mean Floyd could rematch JMM and give him a fair shot and not come above agreed weight and stuff but Floyd wouldnt give rematch would he? He could have given DLH rematch or Pac.
But the word going around is that it would be boring so Floyd dont have to rematch. Doesnt make Floyd look good exactly does it?

[Chrismart]

There was enough people on here wanting him to rematch JMM eachtime. They were close fights, lot's of people thought JMM deserved the nod in some of the fights and though JMM deserved another shot each time.

Maybe no need for the 3rd Bradley fight or Barrera rematch. But i'm glad the subsequent JMM and Morales fights happened, as i enjoyed them.

[Sun_Tzu]

You ever hear of a guy named Sugar Ray Robinson OP? Why did he need rematches?

FFS you just start watching the game?

[Code Red]

You ever hear of a guy named Sugar Ray Robinson OP? Why did he need rematches?

FFS you just start watching the game?

Yeah cause that's what Arum and Pac have in mind when they sign unnecessary rematches....Sugar Ray Robinson

[Sun_Tzu]

Yeah cause that's what Arum and Pac have in mind when they sign unnecessary rematches....Sugar Ray Robinson

Yea cause paq was the multi million dollar star he is he is now in the majority of his fights. Ill agree the bradley fight was unnecessary however all the Marquez fights were worth it. All the other rematches were warranted and good fights.

[therealpugilist]

Lately there has been talk of Pac fighting again, Broner "pricing himself out" so they say, and an interview with Roach that Manny wants a rematch with Floyd Mayweather.

Did Pac also want to fight Bradley 3 times? He wants to fight Marquez 5 times, Morales 3, Barrera 2......what's with all the rematches? Isn't there something to admire about fighters getting it right the first time?

the casual fan cant relate to outright winners and dominance( mayweather, Jones, whitaker, calzaghe, etc)

bull***** sells.....good vs evil..blah blah

they'd rather see an overachiever or underdog have a good showing, they like A good loser

or see some epic struggle where no one asserts dominance


boxing is not rocky or a movie, but like Roger Mayweather said, some people like to believe in bull*****

if you're so awesome of great, fighter of the decade, best of your generation, you dont need a million rematches to prove you're the best.

Manny was a great fighter, all time great...he was just never the fighter the HBO hype machine, skip bayless, the media wanted him to be, which is the best...he was one of the best and thats ok....the media needs to learn you cant force feed us how great someone is.....we have to see it..thats the current situation with GGG...we want to see if he is great but his damage control buddies get butthurt when its brought up

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

Pac is a great fighter but not as great as he was hyped to be, his limited skill set caused him to get hit a lot but hes a mtfkn warrior no doubt. why is mayweathers name coming up in this thread???

[NEETzsche]

because arum only lets him fight other top rank fighters