Guys, can we at least agree that Kovalev is stronger than Froch?
Collapse
-
You're empty on facts and stats and just going with what you feel sounds right. Pascal hasn't had a relevant win in years. His only real win in a while was Bute, who himself has done nothing.Lol come on…. when did Pascal become a shell of a fighter? Because Kovalev stopped him? Not saying Pascal was prime of course, but calling him a shell of a fighter is going too far. Pascal was still a top fighter and had won every fight other than 2 close fights with Hopkins. The 1st beating from Kovalev did take a lot out of him though.
To me Kovalev is definitely more of a 1-punch artist while Froch tends to wear you down more with body shots. Kovalev has had more vicious 1-punch knockouts than Froch, but if you disagree that's fine.
Generally if we use a little common sense, higher weight = more punching power. Not always true but I think it's true in this case with Kovalev and Froch. I'm a fan of Froch, love his style and rooted for him in big fights but I just don't think he has the freakish power Kovalev has which seem to just come out of the blue
That's my point, the strongest puncher Ward has fought has been Froch at 168, who IMO doesn't hit as hard as Kovalev does at 175. I think the difference in power is considerable. Froch is a strong puncher but Kovalev's power in that right hand is freakish and explosive.
You can't just call someone a 1 punch artist when they don't finish guys that way. Now you're just pretending.
You sound really bothered by what happened today and are trying to talk yourself into the idea that Kovalev will 1 punch Ward. Bad news, Ward is one of the hardest to hit in the game and he's several levels above Chilemba. Time to come to terms with it.Comment
-
You obviously haven't followed Pascal's career. You think Kovalev doesn't finish guys with 1-punch, yet Froch does? You do realize Kovalev has knocked people out with single jabs to the body? Come back and run your mouth when you've actually watched a Kovalev fight.You're empty on facts and stats and just going with what you feel sounds right. Pascal hasn't had a relevant win in years. His only real win in a while was Bute, who himself has done nothing.
You can't just call someone a 1 punch artist when they don't finish guys that way. Now you're just pretending.
You sound really bothered by what happened today and are trying to talk yourself into the idea that Kovalev will 1 punch Ward. Bad news, Ward is one of the hardest to hit in the game and he's several levels above Chilemba. Time to come to terms with it.
Me bothered? I simply said I think Kovalev hits harder than Froch, which most people with a brain have agreed with. Of course it's possible he'll 1-punch Ward, this is boxing. But you seem real bothered by the mere suggestion that Kovalev vs Ward will be competitive.
You constantly act like you're on your period for some reason, so I'ma let you at it.Last edited by El JACKAL; 07-11-2016, 11:42 PM.Comment
-
Ok, I've pissed you off so much you're playing the red K comments game. Cute. You're still making stuff up and getting frustrated, evidenced by the fact that you feel the need to pull the "I know the sport, you don't".You obviously haven't followed Pascal's career. You think Kovalev doesn't finish guys with 1-punch, yet Froch does? You do realize Kovalev has knocked people out with single jabs to the body? Come back and run your mouth when you've actually watched a Kovalev fight.
Me bothered? I simply said I think Kovalev hits harder than Froch, which most people with a brain have agreed with. Of course it's possible he'll 1-punch Ward, this is boxing. But you seem bothered by the mere suggestion that Kovalev vs Ward will be competitive.
I've backed up my opinion, you're the one who acts like you're on your period for some reason, so I'ma let you at it.
I love watching Kovalev fight and he's one of the guys I study when looking for ways to expand and refine my technique. Despite the fact that I hold him in high regard, I don't feel the need to lie about his resume. It's not great. The best wins were a shot Pascal and 50 year old Hopkins. Chilemba is is his best win now, IMO. His resume does not represent his ability as a fighter.
You seem to think I'm hating on Kovalev just because I'm not exalting him. I piss a lot of people off because I don't fighter-worship.Comment
-
Well you seem real pissed off by my red K, chill dude it's just a little negative karma in a boxing forum not the end of the world lol.Ok, I've pissed you off so much you're playing the red K comments game. Cute. You're still making stuff up and getting frustrated, evidenced by the fact that you feel the need to pull the "I know the sport, you don't".
I love watching Kovalev fight and he's one of the guys I study when looking for ways to expand and refine my technique. Despite the fact that I hold him in high regard, I don't feel the need to lie about his resume. It's not great. The best wins were a shot Pascal and 50 year old Hopkins. Chilemba is is his best win now, IMO. His resume does not represent his ability as a fighter.
You seem to think I'm hating on Kovalev just because I'm not exalting him.
I simply claimed Kovalev hits harder than Froch, and you had a meltdown, which I find hilarious. Then I pointed out Kovalev has knocked guys out with single jabs when you claimed he didn't have 1-punch power. How am I making stuff up?
I never said "i know the sport, you don't", but it's clear that's the case now.
I don't need to lie about his resume, nor am I saying that he beats Ward. All I'm saying is that Kovalev hits harder than Froch, and has a chance to hurt Ward in a competitive fight. Somehow that has activated your b1tch mode.
Nah it's because your b1tch mode gets activated and you go on irrelevant rants like a little kid whenever someone has a different opinion that you can't refute. You obviously never learned social skills growing up. It's funny in someways actually.
So either refute my point that Kovalev hits harder than Froch, or go have your period somewhere else buddy. This is childish.Last edited by El JACKAL; 07-12-2016, 12:50 AM.Comment
-
Ok, after continually escalating, you're now in "I'm raging mad at this guy so I'm going to pretend I'm really bothering him" mode. I don't get any joy in trading insults so you're on your own now. That's how emotional and upset I am. lolWell you seem real pissed off by my red K, chill dude it's just a little negative karma in a boxing forum not the end of the world lol.
I simply claimed Kovalev hits harder than Froch, and you had a meltdown. Then I pointed out Kovalev has knocked guys out with single jabs when you claimed he didn't have 1-punch power. How am I making stuff up?
I never said "i know the sport, you don't", but it's clear that's the case now.
I don't need to lie about his resume, nor am I saying that he beats Ward. All I'm saying is that Kovalev hits harder than Froch, and has a chance to hurt Ward in a competitive fight. Somehow that has activated your b1tch mode.
Nah it's because you go off-topic and go on irrelevant rants and personal attacks whenever someone has a different opinion that you can't refute. It's funny in someways actually.
Either refute my point that Kovalev hits harder than Froch, or go have your period somewhere else dude. This is childish.
Comment
-
Even cuter that you're also playing it while pretending to be above it.
Ok, so after running out of ideas regarding the actual Boxing debate, you're now in "I'm raging mad at this guy because I can't refute his boxing points so I'm gonna pretend like I'm pissing him off" mode.
I've been talking boxing the whole time, you've been going off-topic and gossiping like a housewife. Trading insults is the only thing you can do here since you have nothing left to say regarding the actual topic.
Learn to handle a different opinion kid, it'll get you far in life I promise.
Last edited by El JACKAL; 07-12-2016, 12:50 AM.Comment
-
See below. I can repeat as many times as you need;Ok, so after running out of ideas regarding the actual Boxing debate, you're now in "I'm raging mad at this guy because I can't refute his boxing points so I'm gonna pretend like I'm pissing him off" mode.
I've been talking boxing the whole time, you've been going off-topic and gossiping like a housewife. Trading insults is the only thing you can do here since you have nothing left to say regarding the actual topic.
Learn to handle a different opinion kid, it'll get you far in life I promise.
Comment
-
See below. I can repeat as many times as you need.
Ok, so after running out of ideas regarding the actual Boxing debate, you're now in "I'm raging mad at this guy because I can't refute his boxing points so I'm gonna pretend like I'm pissing him off" mode.
Trading insults is the only thing you can do here since you have nothing left to say regarding the actual topic.
Learn to handle a different opinion kid, it'll get you far in life I promiseComment
-
Personally I felt that Froch was underwhelming against Ward, though it was probably more that Ward made him look bad than anything else. But regardless of how many rounds you gave Froch, you gotta figure Kovalev has the goods to make for the toughest fight of Ward's career.
Kov is roughly his height, roughly the same reach (maybe even kov adv?), naturally larger, a stronger puncher, skilled tactically, and fairly proven at the world class level. I'd be a little surprised if Ward walks away with this fight as cleanly as he did against Froch.Comment
Comment