I think this is what majority of the posters expect, but if I was Brook, I'd do the complete opposite. There's a film study of Golovkin vs. Monroe that I found very interesting. Here it is:
What he is saying is that Golovkin is too good at hunting and cutting off the ring, that trying to beat him by staying on the outside and boxing is not going to work. He thinks in order to beat him, you either need to take the fight inside or to force him back with aggression.
This can be the right approach for Brook. Everyone already expects this to be a mismatch and that Golovkin will get an early KO. Coming in light and planning to fight 12 rounds is probably not gonna happen, one way or another.
What he is saying is that Golovkin is too good at hunting and cutting off the ring, that trying to beat him by staying on the outside and boxing is not going to work. He thinks in order to beat him, you either need to take the fight inside or to force him back with aggression.
This can be the right approach for Brook. Everyone already expects this to be a mismatch and that Golovkin will get an early KO. Coming in light and planning to fight 12 rounds is probably not gonna happen, one way or another.
Comment