Who would win this fight, in your opinion?
David Lemieux vs. Martin Murray
Collapse
-
-
Murray fought competive fights against Arthur Abraham and George Groves, so if you, by saying "Murray up north" is indicating that Murray would lose, then I would have to disagree with you. I don't see Lemieux as having the neccessary skills to beat Murray.Comment
-
He means Murray is a weight above lemieux...Mr expertComment
-
North as in weight. Murray is not 160..Comment
-
Comment
-
Good fight,, I would like for murray to go back to 160.. I think he is as good as anyone not named Golovkin or jacobsComment
-
Murray is not beating Golovkin, Saunders or Jacobs, the top 3 fighters of the divisin, but I do think he would fight on equal ground against Canelo and Eubank, the second tier of the division.Comment
-
That's not a part of this thread, bro. But yeah. Broner is too big, young, strong and ironchinned for an old small guy with a questionable chin like Pacquiao to beat him. Broner will stop him late. It's okay to disagree with me on that one, as Pacquiao has proven far more than Broner, but reality will show itself.Originally posted by b0xMay I ask why you think Broner beats Pac?Comment
-
Lemieux wins. He wouldn't stop Murray, and I don't think he's even a better boxer, but Murrays cover and flurry tactics simply aren't enough to win fights at the top level. Unless Lemieux were to gas or something he wins the fight on activity and aggression alone.Last edited by Citizen Koba; 07-11-2016, 06:37 AM.Comment
Comment