Khan vs Alvarez / Brook vs Golovkin - Double Standard Karma?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ИATAS
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 36648
    • 2,509
    • 1,953
    • 50,835

    #11
    Difference is obvious - Golovkin tried to fight Canelo, Saunders, Jacobs, Eubank before settling on Kell Brook. Canelo's first option was Amir Khan.

    Neither is a good fight but the differences in circumstances should be obvious to everyone.

    Comment

    • icha
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 9516
      • 330
      • 370
      • 78,629

      #12
      Originally posted by ИATAS
      Difference is obvious - Golovkin tried to fight Canelo, Saunders, Jacobs, Eubank before settling on Kell Brook. Canelo's first option was Amir Khan.

      Neither is a good fight but the differences in circumstances should be obvious to everyone.
      i called canelo-khan a joke and trashed many times, you should do the same...

      Comment

      • ИATAS
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 36648
        • 2,509
        • 1,953
        • 50,835

        #13
        Originally posted by icha
        i called canelo-khan a joke and trashed many times, you should do the same...
        I have been. Read my posts.

        Comment

        • j0zef
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2015
          • 8440
          • 645
          • 767
          • 45,501

          #14
          Actually, the vast majority of the reasonable Golovkin fans have agreed that this is a trash fight against a WW that we have to settle for.

          Check Redd Foxx's poll. You'll see many prominent "Golovkin fanboys" agree that it's a crap fight that Golovkin had to settle for.

          Comment

          • Lester Tutor
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2015
            • 17673
            • 365
            • 253
            • 22,224

            #15
            Originally posted by j0zef
            Actually, the vast majority of the reasonable Golovkin fans have agreed that this is a trash fight against a WW that we have to settle for.

            Check Redd Foxx's poll. You'll see many prominent "Golovkin fanboys" agree that it's a crap fight that Golovkin had to settle for.
            of course. what other option is there? why would they say different if they criticized Alvarez vs Khan.. lol

            Comment

            • TheCell8
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2016
              • 5551
              • 353
              • 44
              • 38,715

              #16
              Not the same thing at all... Brook wasn't their first option. They were negotiating with Eubank Jr. for several weeks. The Eubank's got cold feet and wouldn't sign on the deadline, per Eddie Hearn, Brook was offered the deal and they accepted. Why would Golovkin turn down Brook and say no I'd rather fight the guy who has a 23-2-2 record and brings no money instead?

              Brook accepted the deal, Golovkin signed off and here we are. Enjoy.

              Canelo's situation wasn't the same because his goal was to get a Khan fight first. He didn't settle with Khan when things didn't go his way, he targeted Khan and got him.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP