Wow people weren't so soft on golovkin for fighting a lighter guy.....
Comments Thread For: Gennady Golovkin-Kell Brook Finalized For September 10
Collapse
-
-
Not for nothing but you guys are being completely disingenuous. GGG took step aside money a number of times and then claimed he couldn't get anyone to fight him.
Spence hasn't done that once, so please stop acting like the situations are the same and posters are being hypocritical.Comment
-
lol, reading some of these comments lambasting golovkin, really shows how disgusting boxing fans are in regards to spence vs mikey, whether its based on race e.g. black fans rooting for a black fighter to be in a mismatch, or not, its a disgraceComment
-
How many times has Spence taken step aside money?
Not for nothing but you guys are being completely disingenuous. GGG took step aside money a number of times and then claimed he couldn't get anyone to fight him.
Spence hasn't done that once, so please stop acting like the situations are the same and posters are being hypocritical.Comment
-
How many times has Spence taken step aside money?
Not for nothing but you guys are being completely disingenuous. GGG took step aside money a number of times and then claimed he couldn't get anyone to fight him.
Spence hasn't done that once, so please stop acting like the situations are the same and posters are being hypocritical.
As I've said in other threads, credit to Mikey, but it's not a fight that should be getting made. Just like Khan/Canelo and Brook/GGG weren't.
Posters who hit out for Loma for fighting Rigo, GGG for Brook and Canelo for Khan but are cool with Spence/Garcia because 'there's no one else to fight' or because it would be PPV for them are being hypocritical. It's actually comical reading through the two threads.Comment
-
Slightly off topic but I remember at the time of this fight there was some accusation that Brook was ducking Vargas.
When in reality he went up in weight against the meanest guy in a division he had no business being in. Then in his very next fight he went down in weight to a division he probably no longer should of been fighting in and fought the baddest guy there.
Maybe not the best career choices in hindsight, but still.Comment
-
Canelo and GGG are both equally bad dude. That said, HBO is allowing this.
See this is where Dan is an HBO shill and it drives me crazy. Instead of criticizing GGG and Canelo he tries to make the narrative Brook and Khan daring to be great.
BS. neither is daring to be great. they are both taking huge paydays to get their asses beat rather than fighting guys at their own weights in a more winnable fight for less money.Comment
-
Revisionist memories too. People fail to remember that Brook was in the top 3 P4P at the time. People now act like G beat up some 147lb scrub.Comment
-
There's posters who are being completely hypocritical. There's no other way to describe it. Spence Vs Garcia is a fight of grave size difference come fight night.
As I've said in other threads, credit to Mikey, but it's not a fight that should be getting made. Just like Khan/Canelo and Brook/GGG weren't.
Posters who hit out for Loma for fighting Rigo, GGG for Brook and Canelo for Khan but are cool with Spence/Garcia because 'there's no one else to fight' or because it would be PPV for them are being hypocritical. It's actually comical reading through the two threads.
To claim there is no one to fight you while taking step aside money contradicts that there is no one to fight you.
GGG/Brook and Kahn/Canelo got crapped on when it was signed. Mikey/Spence hasn't been signed yet so it's premature for anyone to cite hypocrisy.
I agree that this is not a fight that should be made, same as I said about the other fights when they were signed. Should be Crawford/Manny, Loma/Mikey and Spence/Thurman.
Who are the posters that are cool with this fight? Posters like The Madison and CJS often cite hypocrisy but don't name names. I find that to be fake and overexaggerated for the purpouses of forwarding their agenda.Comment
Comment