Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Ryabinsky: WADA Has Ruled, Certified Povetkin as Clean

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    So it was a mistake by the WADA? Well, it has been documented from the beginning that the amount of substance was to low to be ruled positive. Why did they say he was positive in the first place? Seems like Team Wilder are the ones who have to pay now, or fight Povetkin.

    Comment


    • #42
      Meldoniumz doe

      • It is classed as an S4 substance under the Wada code, which addresses hormone and metabolic modulators.

      • The standard ban under the World Anti-Doping Code is four years.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by New England View Post
        i need something more than a press release or quote from a promotor
        That's wat I'm thinking as well... I've also yet see anyone else say how much was in his system?

        Comment


        • #44
          I hope Al has Deon in straitjacket when he breaks him this news. You going to Russia boy.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Tobi.G View Post
            So it was a mistake by the WADA? Well, it has been documented from the beginning that the amount of substance was to low to be ruled positive. Why did they say he was positive in the first place? Seems like Team Wilder are the ones who have to pay now, or fight Povetkin.
            You confusing WADA with VADA. As far as I know WADA has said nothing about Povetkin.

            Comment


            • #46
              I look forward to seeing Wilder knocked Povetkin out this fall.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                Lol, what defamation, by repeating what was reported to him by VADA and the WBC? And if I remember correctly, Wilder was already in England getting acclimated to the time change when all this came about. Absolutely none of this has been Wilders fault.
                Yeah you can't defame someone when all you do is repeat waht was told to you and everyone else.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View Post
                  Once again WADA never said anything. They do not test athletes or give test results. They just make the codes. VADA carried out the tests. Stop listening to Ryabinsky.
                  Under WADA code Povetkin is clean. That means under VADA he's clean too.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                    Lol, what defamation, by repeating what was reported to him by VADA and the WBC? And if I remember correctly, Wilder was already in England getting acclimated to the time change when all this came about. Absolutely none of this has been Wilders fault.
                    Did VADA and WBC call him a cheat? I don't believe they did, they said he failed a test, there's a difference.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
                      Under WADA code Povetkin is clean. That means under VADA he's clean too.
                      False...That WADA statement was not specific to Povetkin's case...Whats going to nail Povetkin is the fact that he failed in between testing after passing 3 tests....He will need to prove that the drug goes from undetected to detected...WADA nor VADA has said it behaves in this way.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP