Comments Thread For: Ryabinsky: WADA Has Ruled, Certified Povetkin as Clean

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tobi.G
    Germany's P4P puncher
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 5625
    • 119
    • 25
    • 16,227

    #41
    So it was a mistake by the WADA? Well, it has been documented from the beginning that the amount of substance was to low to be ruled positive. Why did they say he was positive in the first place? Seems like Team Wilder are the ones who have to pay now, or fight Povetkin.

    Comment

    • Lester Tutor
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2015
      • 17673
      • 365
      • 253
      • 22,224

      #42
      Meldoniumz doe

      • It is classed as an S4 substance under the Wada code, which addresses hormone and metabolic modulators.

      • The standard ban under the World Anti-Doping Code is four years.

      Comment

      • Shadoww702
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2015
        • 41176
        • 4,546
        • 2,938
        • 250,035

        #43
        Originally posted by New England
        i need something more than a press release or quote from a promotor
        That's wat I'm thinking as well... I've also yet see anyone else say how much was in his system?

        Comment

        • gioberi
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jul 2013
          • 102
          • 5
          • 8
          • 6,870

          #44
          I hope Al has Deon in straitjacket when he breaks him this news. You going to Russia boy.

          Comment

          • gioberi
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 102
            • 5
            • 8
            • 6,870

            #45
            Originally posted by Tobi.G
            So it was a mistake by the WADA? Well, it has been documented from the beginning that the amount of substance was to low to be ruled positive. Why did they say he was positive in the first place? Seems like Team Wilder are the ones who have to pay now, or fight Povetkin.
            You confusing WADA with VADA. As far as I know WADA has said nothing about Povetkin.

            Comment

            • Ake-Dawg
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2016
              • 5510
              • 127
              • 80
              • 76,361

              #46
              I look forward to seeing Wilder knocked Povetkin out this fall.

              Comment

              • Shadoww702
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2015
                • 41176
                • 4,546
                • 2,938
                • 250,035

                #47
                Originally posted by JAB5239
                Lol, what defamation, by repeating what was reported to him by VADA and the WBC? And if I remember correctly, Wilder was already in England getting acclimated to the time change when all this came about. Absolutely none of this has been Wilders fault.
                Yeah you can't defame someone when all you do is repeat waht was told to you and everyone else.

                Comment

                • Robbie Barrett
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 40891
                  • 2,779
                  • 667
                  • 570,921

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Kagami Taiga
                  Once again WADA never said anything. They do not test athletes or give test results. They just make the codes. VADA carried out the tests. Stop listening to Ryabinsky.
                  Under WADA code Povetkin is clean. That means under VADA he's clean too.

                  Comment

                  • Robbie Barrett
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 40891
                    • 2,779
                    • 667
                    • 570,921

                    #49
                    Originally posted by JAB5239
                    Lol, what defamation, by repeating what was reported to him by VADA and the WBC? And if I remember correctly, Wilder was already in England getting acclimated to the time change when all this came about. Absolutely none of this has been Wilders fault.
                    Did VADA and WBC call him a cheat? I don't believe they did, they said he failed a test, there's a difference.

                    Comment

                    • Sugarhitman
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Mar 2016
                      • 149
                      • 4
                      • 0
                      • 6,229

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts
                      Under WADA code Povetkin is clean. That means under VADA he's clean too.
                      False...That WADA statement was not specific to Povetkin's case...Whats going to nail Povetkin is the fact that he failed in between testing after passing 3 tests....He will need to prove that the drug goes from undetected to detected...WADA nor VADA has said it behaves in this way.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP