So it was a mistake by the WADA? Well, it has been documented from the beginning that the amount of substance was to low to be ruled positive. Why did they say he was positive in the first place? Seems like Team Wilder are the ones who have to pay now, or fight Povetkin.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Ryabinsky: WADA Has Ruled, Certified Povetkin as Clean
Collapse
-
Meldoniumz doe
• It is classed as an S4 substance under the Wada code, which addresses hormone and metabolic modulators.
• The standard ban under the World Anti-Doping Code is four years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tobi.G View PostSo it was a mistake by the WADA? Well, it has been documented from the beginning that the amount of substance was to low to be ruled positive. Why did they say he was positive in the first place? Seems like Team Wilder are the ones who have to pay now, or fight Povetkin.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostLol, what defamation, by repeating what was reported to him by VADA and the WBC? And if I remember correctly, Wilder was already in England getting acclimated to the time change when all this came about. Absolutely none of this has been Wilders fault.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostLol, what defamation, by repeating what was reported to him by VADA and the WBC? And if I remember correctly, Wilder was already in England getting acclimated to the time change when all this came about. Absolutely none of this has been Wilders fault.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View PostUnder WADA code Povetkin is clean. That means under VADA he's clean too.
Comment
Comment