Comments Thread For: Klitschko Manager Wants Full Investigation on Fury Doping Claim
Collapse
-
Steve strikes me as the type of guy who believes the gossip section, as why else would papers print gossip? Here's me thinking they print it so they can sell papers/attract idiots to their website and cause a stir.Comment
-
It's not gossip as ukada have not denied he's not being investigated so that alone says he's being investigated.....although there is gossip these kind of reports would not be printed if there was no substance to it.....massive libel payments would be dished out and it's ironic the furys have gone very silent...so what does that say.....to be honest if he has been involved in peds then he's a ****** man because his next few fights would have set him up for life and secondly I won't get to see AJ knock him out which is what I really wanted to see.so I feel bad for that....something's is going on that's for sureLast edited by The plunger man; 07-02-2016, 09:12 AM.Comment
-
We can all take excerpts from members posts lol....the point is when they actually name the person involved then we're talking serious reporting....if it was a rumour or unsubstantiated there no names would be printed...that's a fact and 9 out of 10 ten times when a name is is thrown out there its normally true ....where exactly have the furys disappeared to.....we know why hughie fury is covered in boils now don't we lolComment
-
Comment
-
It's not gossip as ukada have not denied he's not being investigated so that alone says he's being investigated.....although there is gossip these kind of reports would not be printed if there was no substance to it.....massive libel payments would be dished out and it's ironic the furys have gone very silent...so what does that say.....to be honest if he has been involved in peds then he's a ****** man because his next few fights would have set him up for life and secondly I won't get to see AJ knock him out which is what I really wanted to see.so I feel bad for that....something's is going on that's for sure
The newspaper claimed that the discovery led to a probe by UK Anti-Doping officials. It is understood Fury was called to a meeting in September when he was told the levels of the steroid found were higher than the body would naturally produce.
In a statement, Team Fury declared, “We are baffled by today’s story in the Sunday Mirror. Tyson Fury absolutely denies any allegation of doping. He looks forward to recovering from his injury and defending his titles against Wladimir Klitschko in October.”
I suppose I would literally laugh my arse off if the story turns out true, especially in the same year Fury pulls out of a fight with a bruised ankle, yet I just don't believe there is any substance to this allegation.Last edited by BlackRevolver; 07-02-2016, 09:34 AM.Comment
-
Ok Steve, if I'm wrong and this is indeed proved true, then according to this
Then you have the statement from Fury's team
If the allegation was true, then they couldn't be baffled, if we are to believe what's written about him apparently being called into a meeting?
I suppose I would literally laugh my arse off if the story turns out true, especially in the same year Fury pulls out of a fight with a bruised ankle, yet I just don't believe there is any substance to this allegation.Comment
-
She said: "UK Anti-Doping does not discuss or disclose details of any cases until due legal process has been completed or a respondent chooses to put the information into the public domain.
"This is to protect the rights and privacy of all involved and to ensure that a case is not subjected to unnecessary prejudice.
"It is important to note that an anti-doping rule violation is only deemed to have been committed once the legal process, including any appeals, has been completed. At that point, details of a violation will be made available on the Ukad website."Comment
-
If you want an example of a similar case of allegations being made, remember Mo Farah? he was left to deny all allegations made.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-sports/athletics/uk-anti-doping-chiefs-probe-allegations-5971963UKAD boss Nicole Sapstead says: “Our mission is to protect everyone's right to clean sport, especially those athletes who choose to follow, defend and respect the anti-doping rules.”
In June this year Mo, 32, was forced to deny accusations of drug taking after his coach Alberto Salazar was alleged to have violated anti-doping rules
Farah reportedly missed the tests in 2010 and 2011 - under UK anti-doping rules three missed tests in any 12-month period can lead to a four-year ban
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) refused to comment on allegations of the missed drugs tests, saying: "UK Anti-Doping does not disclose personal data relating to an individual's test history.
"UKAD has a dedicated Athlete Support Officer who works with athletes on the National Registered Testing Pool, and with National Governing Bodies of sport, to ensure they manage their whereabouts reporting responsibilities."
UK Athletics finds "no reason to be concerned" about Mo Farah's coach Alberto Salazar and his Nike Oregon training regime.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/athletics...en-he-was-acc/
The reason I posted the above links, is you can see how one tabloid works, while Farah had to deny allegations because of who he was associated with.Last edited by BlackRevolver; 07-02-2016, 11:16 AM.Comment
-
Ok Steve, if I'm wrong and this is indeed proved true, then according to this
Then you have the statement from Fury's team
If the allegation was true, then they couldn't be baffled, if we are to believe what's written about him apparently being called into a meeting?
I suppose I would literally laugh my arse off if the story turns out true, especially in the same year Fury pulls out of a fight with a bruised ankle, yet I just don't believe there is any substance to this allegation.Comment
Comment