Have they? Please show me a link or an article whereby they confirm that an investigation is going on. Don't even try and teach me on BN, I worked with Matt Christie and Tris Dixon on BN
I do know how the british board of control works. And you don't. You have so far provided no proof or factswhatsoever that suggests Fury is a steroids cheat.
The only thing you're clinging your hopes to is a UKAD statement saying they don't comment in public That's sad man. You have provided absolutely zero facts. Saying you have doesn't make it true. You have provided nothing. If and when Fury is proven to be a steroids cheat, I will judge him then. Not now based on what the mirror of all newspapers, are claiming.
Well, I might be a terrible journalist who has worked all over the world, writing for big international publications.. But I'm still 10 times more knowledgeable about boxing than you. And that's all that matters on this forum.
Wrong. You have already made a judgement. You called the allegations bullcrap.
They don't make sense right now. All evidence lead to the opposite. Should I be wrong, I will naturally change my position.
Unlike you, I don't base my facts on the back of one of the worst tabloids in the UK that has been sued and lost multiple times for stuff like this.
So until then, show me proof.
You have already made your judgement
And that judgement is exactly based upon the tabloid.
Note how I havent been adamant at all in this case unlike you. You have been crystal clear in your judgement. Well you have been crystalclear untill you suddenly say that you reserve your judgement.
Maybe you need to clarify your position. You are all over the place. Is these allegations bullcrap or Will you wait with your judgement. All your boxingscene fans await your Call. The World renowned reporter is about to tell exactly how he feels about it (at this moment).
And that judgement is exactly based upon the tabloid.
Note how I havent been adamant at all in this case unlike you. You have been crystal clear in your judgement. Well you have been crystalclear untill you suddenly say that you reserve your judgement.
Maybe you need to clarify your position. You are all over the place. Is these allegations bullcrap or Will you wait with your judgement. All your boxingscene fans await your Call. The World renowned reporter is about to tell exactly how he feels about it (at this moment).
Haven't been adamant? You have called Fury a steroid cheat on multiple occasions. Your position is clear. You want Fury to be on steroids so you can somehow excuse Klitschko's loss.
My position is very very clear. The allegations come out of nowhere and have no substance to them whatsoever. If they were true, all of the serious newspapers would have picked up on the story. Since the first story, it has totally died out which again suggests total bs. There are no sources, no nothing. Again suggests total bs. As has been proven by the BBBofC's history, instant bans have been put on anyone who has tested positive for banned substances - According to the story, Fury has fought under the british license since, has scheduled another fight and Hughie Fury - The other defendant - has fought under British license multiple times. Another reason why this story suggests ill research and total bs.
Now, am I 100% sure? Of course not, I wasn't a fly on the wall when this was supposed to happen. So if I should be mistaken in my belief, I will of course change my opinion.
Haven't been adamant? You have called Fury a steroid cheat on multiple occasions. Your position is clear. You want Fury to be on steroids so you can somehow excuse Klitschko's loss.
My position is very very clear. The allegations come out of nowhere and have no substance to them whatsoever. If they were true, all of the serious newspapers would have picked up on the story. Since the first story, it has totally died out which again suggests total bs. There are no sources, no nothing. Again suggests total bs. As has been proven by the BBBofC's history, instant bans have been put on anyone who has tested positive for banned substances - According to the story, Fury has fought under the british license since, has scheduled another fight and Hughie Fury - The other defendant - has fought under British license multiple times. Another reason why this story suggests ill research and total bs.
Now, am I 100% sure? Of course not, I wasn't a fly on the wall when this was supposed to happen. So if I should be mistaken in my belief, I will of course change my opinion.
Liar!
Direct me to the posts where I have called him a steroid cheat. #spoiler. You cannot because I never did.
Ouch, somebody call the firemen Teddy Atlas and Tim Bradley. Nelson just got burned.
Jokes aside, comments should be taken in context.
Nelsen just called out Mandy on her defending Fury being a drug cheat when all evidence so far suggests he is going to fail in his appeal to have the positive test overturned.
Defending a drug cheat because of his nationality aint no joke.
Comment