First of all I'm saying that for most fight fans - but obv not you - Eubank would be a more attractive fight than Lara.
Secondly on looking at your link the title doesn't match what Golovkin is quoted as saying. Third - that is from 3 years exactly ago. Things change you know - like Canelo comes in at 175+, back then Canelo was not the MW champion and hadn't yet thought at 155. And GGG wasn't the mandatory to Canelo back then.
And 4thly - what has Ward and Canelo got to do with which is a better fight for this September - Lara or Eubank.
You have to show intent to get a fight. Spence was chasing Thurman 12-18 months ago. Now he has done something the fight makes sense, back then not so much. Same deal with Lara, losing to Canelo and beating Vanes doesn't really count as doing something. Do Something. Anything.
Secondly on looking at your link the title doesn't match what Golovkin is quoted as saying. Third - that is from 3 years exactly ago. Things change you know - like Canelo comes in at 175+, back then Canelo was not the MW champion and hadn't yet thought at 155. And GGG wasn't the mandatory to Canelo back then.
And 4thly - what has Ward and Canelo got to do with which is a better fight for this September - Lara or Eubank.
You have to show intent to get a fight. Spence was chasing Thurman 12-18 months ago. Now he has done something the fight makes sense, back then not so much. Same deal with Lara, losing to Canelo and beating Vanes doesn't really count as doing something. Do Something. Anything.
Comment