is ppv boxing dead?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • El Tejano
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Nov 2015
    • 549
    • 31
    • 0
    • 1,287

    #1

    is ppv boxing dead?

    I just don't see any matchup currently doing over a 1.5 million sales.
  • Motorcity Cobra
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2016
    • 32565
    • 1,106
    • 545
    • 963,610

    #2
    Originally posted by El Tejano
    I just don't see any matchup currently doing over a 1.5 million sales.
    Very few matchups have done that much. Very few matchups have done a million. What Floyd and Manny were able to accomplish, with almost every PPV being 800k and above, is not normal.

    The model isn't dead but putting Postol-Craword and Ward-Kovalev and GGG-Lemieux on PPV is trying to kill it.

    Golovkin vs. Canelo. and Wilder vs. Fury or Joshua are the only PPV worthy fights out there.

    Comment

    • j0zef
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 8440
      • 645
      • 767
      • 45,501

      #3
      Nah, people are just used to PPV success of Floyd and Pac. The purses of Canelo/Khan and Pac/BradleyIII are not sustainable in a current environment. Those events were financial flops. The ~20m+ purses will be saved for bonafide superstar showdowns, with the other PPV events paying $10-15M max.

      Look at the Crawford/Postol - they mentioned that it needs 75k buys to break even. That's 75k*$50 = 3.7m of revenue, HBO takes half = 1.9m left + 2m gate = 3.9m for promoters, fighters, fees and other expense. Thus the purses are probably 1.5m TC / 1m Postol guaranteed, with maybe % of PPV revenue over 100k buys or something.

      That's enough to keep everyone happy - HBO makes money, fighteers make money and promoters make money.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP