Khan's resume is a joke

[talz]

His resume is still 100 times better than Brooks.

[therealpugilist]

What does it mean to fight people way over the hill? Nothing. I'm not saying Khan doesn't have a better resume. But as is exemplified with Khan's girly actions, people are not exactly lining up to face Brook.

People have always been lining up to face Khan because even in defeat, they won't be getting hurt because the guy couldn't knock a wank out.

I'm just curious why Brook is the only one who has to prove himself. Maybe you can shed some light on that?

What is it you are not getting...the man won a title and is fighting bums. He finally has a decent opponent in years.

[LacedUp]

What is it you are not getting...the man won a title and is fighting bums. He finally has a decent opponent in years.

Ok.... and why is he the only guy that needs to "prove himself" to get in the con "sweepstakes"?

Beating undefeated world champions and unifying the division just isn't enough.

[therealpugilist]

Ok.... and why is he the only guy that needs to "prove himself" to get in the con "sweepstakes"?

Beating undefeated world champions and unifying the division just isn't enough.

he has a chance to unify....fight isnt over til its over.

A lot of them need to prove themselves ...147 is wide open

[LacedUp]

he has a chance to unify....fight isnt over til its over.

A lot of them need to prove themselves ...147 is wide open

Ok so you have nothing to say.

Glad we got that cleared up.

[therealpugilist]

Ok so you have nothing to say.

Glad we got that cleared up.

...Brook resume is a joke...k bye

ring had his guy top ten p4p lol...he has one win over a top ten opponent. If none of the other ww were there he definitely didnt belong. He fights the worse opposition as of late.

[BrometheusBob.]

finally....his 3rd career titleholder...nice


Khan has been in the ring with 13


face it....Brook has a weak resume...I'd favor him to beat Khan now after how Canelo stretched him...fighters are never the same after shots like that, especially from a bigger guy



doesnt change the fact Brook hasnt took many risks and his resume reflects as much.

Just more proof that listing the number of alphabet soup title holders a fighter has been in with is meaningless without further context.

He's fought 3 top guys, been knocked out by two of them and just managed to survive the other.

He's lost to one average guy, been knocked out by a bum inside 90 seconds and in between that fought very stylistically friendly opponents; be it feather fisted opponents, washed up opponents or average opponents...in some cases, all 3.

The 'resume' thing Khan spouts is just more delusions.

Truth

[LacedUp]

...Brook resume is a joke...k bye

ring had his guy top ten p4p lol...he has one win over a top ten opponent. If none of the other ww were there he definitely didnt belong. He fights the worse opposition as of late.

Still i'm not hearing why he's the only guy who needs to prove himself.

Ah now I get it. It's because Khan has fought so many undefeated world champions.... oh wait. He doesn't even have one.

[VG_Addict]

Khan struggled with Algieri. Spence destroyed Algieri.

[therealpugilist]

Just more proof that listing the number of alphabet soup title holders a fighter has been in with is meaningless without further context.



Truth

its always meaningless when the fighter a poster likes has a crap resume


In the past year...resume means nothing...beating champions mean nothing...beating titlists mean nothing either

so what does matter?


Most titleholders are at least top ten contenders in their respective weight class, so it does mean something whether you like it or not

others are experienced so they are good measuring sticks for the progression of prospects and future champions