Comments Thread For: Klitschko: Fury's Reign Will Be One of The Shortest in History

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Weltschmerz
    Sehnsucht
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 16546
    • 698
    • 1,622
    • 27,699

    #21
    Do it Vlad, it's the only way to silence these ****ing Fury fanboys.

    Comment

    • removed
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 21479
      • 4,005
      • 831
      • 164,542

      #22
      Wladimir will never beat Tyson Fury as long as he's got a hole in his arse.

      Comment

      • Fury4daWIN
        takin' one for the team
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2015
        • 3110
        • 156
        • 318
        • 2,222

        #23
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        Will only matter if he wins again. Or he'll end up like Hasim Rahman, a footnote. I do think Fury is slept on but I also think Wlad has a lot on the line here.
        Not really. The nature of the wins is different. Rahman is a clear definition of a one hit wonder, a big guy with power stunning the champ in a moment of complacency. Fury on the other hand completely outboxed the champ for twelve straight rounds and made it look easy. There's no argument there that it was a fluke, or that Wlad got careless. He was simply beaten by the better man on the night, and that's not something that can be dismissed easily.

        Comment

        • Fury4daWIN
          takin' one for the team
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2015
          • 3110
          • 156
          • 318
          • 2,222

          #24
          Originally posted by therealpugilist
          they say every great fighter has a great fight left in them

          also wlad has done better in all his rematches....vs Byrd, Peter, Brewster...he is a tactician and good technical fighter. Im sure he and his team broke things down.
          Considering the limp **** way Wlad lost his titles first time out I think that last great fight may have passed him by, frankly.

          Wlad does tend to be better in rematches, and that's not something that should be overlooked, but even in those fights he either won the first match (Peter, Byrd, Thompson) or had competitive moments (Brewster). He was never just soundly outclassed for the whole stretch.

          Tactician or not, how are you supposed to devise a strategy to turn that around? Not to mention Fury is mad as a bunch of g****fruits and a superior tactician in his own right. Wlad really has nothing to build on.

          Comment

          • removed
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 21479
            • 4,005
            • 831
            • 164,542

            #25
            Tyson Fury is a real man, not a cheat like Klitschko.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #26
              Originally posted by WTF Huck!
              Not really. The nature of the wins is different. Rahman is a clear definition of a one hit wonder, a big guy with power stunning the champ in a moment of complacency. Fury on the other hand completely outboxed the champ for twelve straight rounds and made it look easy. There's no argument there that it was a fluke, or that Wlad got careless. He was simply beaten by the better man on the night, and that's not something that can be dismissed easily.
              Well, we shall see very soon, my friend.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP