Comments Thread For: Wilder-Povetkin Decision Coming Very Soon, Says WBC Prez

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46545
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Wilder-Povetkin Decision Coming Very Soon, Says WBC Prez

    The promoter for Russian heavyweight boxer Alexander Povetkin said he wants the title fight against WBC champion Deontay Wilder rescheduled for later this year and that new testing proves Povetkin is clean. Wilder had been due to fight Povetkin, his mandatory challenger, on May 21 in Moscow...
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Weltschmerz
    Sehnsucht
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 16546
    • 698
    • 1,622
    • 27,699

    #2
    Indeed Sulaiman needs to listen to any further VADA rulings before coming out with a decision.

    Comment

    • ShoulderRoll
      Join The Great Resist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 55875
      • 10,014
      • 5,013
      • 763,445

      #3
      Povetkin should face some kind of suspension.

      Comment

      • Boxing Logic
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2016
        • 4049
        • 442
        • 65
        • 59,061

        #4
        Povetkin is clean. Wilder just ducked him plain and simple. You're allowed to have 1 microgram and Povetkin didn't even have 10% that much. The levels were microscopic, clearly just residue from using it last year when it was legal. I can't believe the boxing media let Wilder get away with ducking the fight and claiming Povetkin was dirty when WADA quickly said he wasn't. Now the B sample came back and boxingscene reported the levels were again "extremely minor," which means it was under 1 microgram again, meaning both A sample and B sample were legal according to WADA guidelines.

        Povetkin was clean, Wilder ducked the fight.

        Comment

        • vitali1999
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 4696
          • 230
          • 43
          • 33,565

          #5
          Whatever ruling and whosever fault, it's bad for boxing when a so called champion never has to face a top contender

          Comment

          • JULIEN44
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2015
            • 367
            • 33
            • 0
            • 7,156

            #6
            Originally posted by Boxing Logic
            Povetkin is clean. Wilder just ducked him plain and simple. You're allowed to have 1 microgram and Povetkin didn't even have 10% that much. The levels were microscopic, clearly just residue from using it last year when it was legal. I can't believe the boxing media let Wilder get away with ducking the fight and claiming Povetkin was dirty when WADA quickly said he wasn't. Now the B sample came back and boxingscene reported the levels were again "extremely minor," which means it was under 1 microgram again, meaning both A sample and B sample were legal according to WADA guidelines.

            Povetkin was clean, Wilder ducked the fight.
            Strongly agree with you.

            A lot of people tried to duck consciously or unconsciously that fact.

            I read so much supremacist/racist statements on Deontay boxing nation channel that I'm happy not to live in USA.

            Comment

            • nycsmooth
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2011
              • 8459
              • 78
              • 1
              • 15,892

              #7
              2 me still confusing...what about Valdés @ 130...every 1 w/ excuses & no 1 gets pinched... great system...

              Comment

              • nycsmooth
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2011
                • 8459
                • 78
                • 1
                • 15,892

                #8
                Originally posted by nycsmooth
                2 me still confusing...what about Valdés @ 130...every 1 w/ excuses & no 1 gets pinched... great system...
                I meant Vargas, Francisco....sorry all...

                Comment

                • Shadoww702
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2015
                  • 41176
                  • 4,546
                  • 2,938
                  • 250,035

                  #9
                  Easy! You test positive on Sample "A" and then Sample "B" confirms it... Your a CHEAT. One year ban at least.

                  Comment

                  • Shadoww702
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2015
                    • 41176
                    • 4,546
                    • 2,938
                    • 250,035

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Boxing Logic
                    Povetkin is clean. Wilder just ducked him plain and simple. You're allowed to have 1 microgram and Povetkin didn't even have 10% that much. The levels were microscopic, clearly just residue from using it last year when it was legal. I can't believe the boxing media let Wilder get away with ducking the fight and claiming Povetkin was dirty when WADA quickly said he wasn't. Now the B sample came back and boxingscene reported the levels were again "extremely minor," which means it was under 1 microgram again, meaning both A sample and B sample were legal according to WADA guidelines.

                    Povetkin was clean, Wilder ducked the fight.
                    Yeah, I hear Wilder snuck in his room in Russia to inject PEDvetkin just so he didn't have to fight.

                    Residue??? WOW!!!! I can see no matter what he's going to be innocent. If the Needle Don't Fit, You must ACQUIT!!!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP