Comments Thread For: Roach: I'd Still Like Mayweather To Face a 'Healthy' Manny Pacquiao

[WesternChamp]

1. So you quoted me, which you know damn well alerts me, but you didn't want me to respond? You just magically thought I give a **** about your opinion? How ****** is this?


2. Are you really this dim? The contract was a product of both teams negotiating. Why the hell would he draft a contract all on his own, and make it for 50/50 split?

3. So because he didn't wear an outfit that was made 5 years ago, this means something to you.



Please go away. It's embarrassing for me to even talk to you.

you chose to reply and tell me to GOMD, and now your mad because i used it back at you! lol.

the contract was NEVER agreed on, which part dont you get? it doesnt matter if he signed it, it was never agree on so its invalid. he signed what he was proposing to top rank! lmao!!!!

so him showing the outfit means something to you too then? means enough for you to bring it up until i flipped it on you.

[WesternChamp]

A contract sent on Dec. 11, 2009, by Golden Boy Promotions on behalf of Mayweather to Top Rank on behalf of Pacquiao proposed a 50-50 financial split between the sides for a fight that would have been held March 13, 2010.

The eight-page agreement is so detailed that it indicates which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the lock room (Mayweather)


lmao!!!!!! its a contract golden boy sent to top rank on behalf of what floyd wanted!!!!! this fool really serious about this? lol

[Larry the boss]

Please tell me why some of you cant move on..I dont get it, was this the only reason ya'll watched boxing?

[Zaroku]

Great video! I am LMAO!

[travestyny]

A contract sent on Dec. 11, 2009, by Golden Boy Promotions on behalf of Mayweather to Top Rank on behalf of Pacquiao proposed a 50-50 financial split between the sides for a fight that would have been held March 13, 2010.

The eight-page agreement is so detailed that it indicates which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the lock room (Mayweather)


lmao!!!!!! its a contract golden boy sent to top rank on behalf of what floyd wanted!!!!! this fool really serious about this? lol

I'm mad? More like you are delusional.


Ok, answer one question.

If Floyd signed a contract that says he wanted the fight for a 50/50 split.

And Pacquaio refused because he didn't want to take the drug test...

Who was ducking whom? I'll wait.

Keep in mind who Pac's coach said was responsible for the first fight falling apart.

[WesternChamp]

I'm mad? More like you are delusional.


Ok, answer one question.

If Floyd signed a contract that says he wanted the fight for a 50/50 split.

And Pacquaio refused because he didn't want to take the drug test...

Who was ducking whom? I'll wait.

Keep in mind who Pac's coach said was responsible for the first fight falling apart.

pac didnt refuse, pac asked for a cut off in return which floyd didnt agree on.

you just proved what i said that floyd signed a contract on what he wanted! lol

i know you knew this already. do we really need to go back to this?

[travestyny]

pac didnt refuse, pac asked for a cut off in return which floyd didnt agree on.

you just proved what i said that floyd signed a contract on what he wanted! lol

i know you knew this already. do we really need to go back to this?

hahahahaha. A cutt off??? That's your answer? He refused because he wanted a cut-off.

Ok. What happened when Floyd offered him a 14-day cut off? Do tell.


So now we have Mayweather signing to give 50-50 split. Pac didn't want to do full drug testing. Mayweather says, ok, 14 Day cutt-off....

Pac's response was???

Tell me.

[WesternChamp]

it was a contract that golden boy sent to top rank so of course floyd signed it!!! it was what floyd wanted! it wouldnt mean anything if golden boy sent top rank a contract with no signature on it right? so of course floyd had to sign it. lol

[WesternChamp]

hahahahaha. A cutt off??? That's your answer? He refused because he wanted a cut-off.

Ok. What happened when Floyd offered him a 14-day cut off? Do tell.


So now we have Mayweather signing to give 50-50 split. Pac didn't want to do full drug testing. Mayweather says, ok, 14 Day cutt-off....

Pac's response was???

Tell me.

so your just gonna ignore the cut off that pac asked and floyd refuse right?

your just bringing up what floyd says but not what pac is asking back in reutrn.

you keep proving that the contract was NEVER agree on. keep it up.

[travestyny]

it was a contract that golden boy sent to top rank so of course floyd signed it!!! it was what floyd wanted! it wouldnt mean anything if golden boy sent top rank a contract with no signature on it right? so of course floyd had to sign it. lol

You said he wanted no part of "that Pac."

He signed on the dotted line for a 50/50 split.

Pac said no because he wanted a cut-off date for testing, according to you.

He offered 14-day cut-off.

What did Pacquaio say? I'm still waiting.


Brace yourself. You are about to get owned.