Originally posted by NaijaD
View Post
Even if Jacobs-Quillin only sold 9,000 tickets (though I can't find the pricing for the seats, Jacobs-Quillin started at $50, and the pricing scheme for Thurman-Porter, at the same venue with the same promoter, is basically $500/$400/$300/$250/$200/$150/$125/$100/$75/$50), the assumption that they didn't clear a good amount of money is silly.
And, TV rating aside, Showtime shelled out for the support programming for Jacobs-Quillin, the Jacobs-Quillin fight card, and a full suplementary fight card on SHO Extreme, saw the rating, and were over the moon about it (acknowledging what the rating was, but over the moon with the amount of buzz that the event picked up post-fight, especially with the replays everywhere).
Unlike with Golovkin, Showtime isn't likely to take some massive step back with Jacobs' next big headlining fight, putting more money behind their man if need be.
If Golovkin makes short work of him, then so be it; he finally beat a guy worth beating, cong****.
The more interesting point, though, is that, basically not until the WBA made it clear that Daniel Jacobs was the WBA's mandatory challenger, K2 openly tried to act as if Jacobs didn't exist either, like they've openly continued to do with Lara.
Golovkin's fans seem to have more confidence in certain outcomes than either Golovkin's trainer or promoter are.
Comment