Comments Thread For: Sugar Ray Leonard: I Told Mayweather I Would Have Beat Him

[aboutfkntime]

Pacquaio was 5ft 6 with a 67 inch reach and travelled up from flyweight ..leonard was a welterweight travelling up to welterweight..... Leonard 5ft 10 with a 74inch reach and mayweather 5ft 8 and 72 reach and a natural super featherweight....please learn some knowledge gurner ....leonard wins without a doubt wanker lol

kid, it would come down to how those styles mesh, and you have NO idea.

And intangibles/skillset would play a large part.

You funny little clueless clown.

You are at best, an uninformed " guesser ".

[aboutfkntime]

I know m8....there ridiculous but it's only a few....all the others say what we say so it's pretty unanimous that leonard was just physically to big for him....floyd as 135 or 140 fighter he was top 3 off all time.....but your also right about whitaker ...his defence was literally right in front of you...his angles was crazy when he boxed you..u couldn't hit him cleanly beczuse he was so slippery....he would pivot and slide and just turn u in knots....a very difficult skill to learn and be great at...he was for the purists and a very unique figher...Winky Wright was also a master of defence....I don't see any welterweight that floyd faced would be able to beat Duran or Hearns not one !

You spastics called Mayweather a coward because Pacquiao ducked random blood tests

In fact, you spastics said ALL THAT SAME DUMB **** about Pac LMAO

And what sort of ****** would compare him to winky ?

Why the fk did you throw Winky Wright in there you muppet ?

Is this where you rattle off some names to try to convince me that you understand the sport?

[aboutfkntime]

Floyd was better than Leonard, Leonard was bigger though. I think it's a 7-5 fight either way and depending on who had the better strategy that's who would win that night. Anyone saying either fighter has no chance is clueless, these are both all time top 5-10 fighters, either one has a chance.

Absolutely, good post man !

It would also come down to how those styles mesh, and how each of them adapted as the fight unfolded..... and intangibles would most likely come into play as well.

These casual-fan muppets are clueless.

Harder to pick than a broken nose.

[hugh grant]

Foyd basically said ggg is too much for him. Well srl is hardly the lesser of two evils. Floyd would knoiw srl was too much foir him. Floyd wouldnt fighht srl, at least senior did

[aboutfkntime]

Foyd basically said ggg is too much for him. Well srl is hardly the lesser of two evils. Floyd would knoiw srl was too much foir him. Floyd wouldnt fighht srl, at least senior did

Golovkin is a middleweight, you muppet.

And Mayweather said that Golovkin would be easy work, no special effects.

Mayweather > Golovkin, at 154.

There is a good argument for Leonard over Mayweather because Leonard proved himself against elite opposition, wake me up when Golovkin does that.

[aboutfkntime]

The only guy I think would probably beat Mayweather is Hearns.

All those other fights are way too close to bet on.

[hugh grant]

Golovkin is a middleweight, you muppet.

And Mayweather said that Golovkin would be easy work, no special effects.

Mayweather > Golovkin, at 154.

Yes, who cares if he's a middleweight?. So was hasgler and srl beat him. Floyd won't fight GGG, not because he's too big, but because he's too good. Floyd wouldn't fight srl for the same reason. Too good, would take the zero and Floyd don't want that

[Spoon23]

Pacquaio was 5ft 6 with a 67 inch reach and travelled up from flyweight ..leonard was a welterweight travelling up to welterweight..... Leonard 5ft 10 with a 74inch reach and mayweather 5ft 8 and 72 reach and a natural super featherweight....please learn some knowledge gurner ....leonard wins without a doubt wanker lol

Nicely said.

Talent and physical advantages would have been too much for Floyd. SRL anyday.

[Spoon23]

. You are right with this spoon. And of course leonard beats mayweather by TKO ...leonard was way to much for floyd to handle



Tyson's style of fighting was based on a young mans style.....he reached physical maturity at a very young age for a heavyweight , his sole aim on winning was based on explosiveness and to incapacitate his opponent as quickly as possible and that's all to do with his physical attributes at that weight....for instance his reach was the length of a marvin Hagler at middleweight 75 inches instead of an 82 reach , his height also was 5ft 11 max ! so mike Tyson reached his peak I would at 21 or 22 and most probably the night he beat Michael spinks....it's genetics of your body that decides when you are at your prime. for instance you take running most 100 metre runners are of powerful build and short...designed for explosiveness out the blocks and normally they are more youthful....however a marathon runner will reach maturity at a more mature age say 28 or 30 and they are of slim build for less stress on the joints over a long distance and more stamina and endurance.....so tyson reached his prime at 21 and then was at his utmost prime for another 2 years and then faded really quickly ...there was no way he could have kept his prime for more than 2 or 3 years due to his fighting style and build.....so doom spoon is right on this

Thanks for confirming I was right. Doom Specialist was calling me a spin doctor when I did stick to my guns, while he kept on spinning everything when his agenda won't fit his point lol

# Doom specialist exposed

Cheers!

[aboutfkntime]

Yes, who cares if he's a middleweight?. So was hasgler and srl beat him. Floyd won't fight GGG, not because he's too big, but because he's too good. Floyd wouldn't fight srl for the same reason. Too good, would take the zero and Floyd don't want that

Why didn't Pac fight Golovkin ?

Why didn't Pac fight a genuine JMW ?