Comments Thread For: Keith Thurman: We Don't Yet Know If Kell Brook is 'Really Special'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Keith Thurman: We Don't Yet Know If Kell Brook is 'Really Special'

    NEW YORK Keith Thurman's performance against Shawn Porter naturally will be compared to how Kell Brook beat Porter. That's fine by Thurman, who would like to box Brook while trying to become the sport's undisputed welterweight champion. Brook's majority-decision victory over Porter in August 2014 impressed Thurman, but the undefeated WBA welterweight title-holder believes Brook still has plenty to prove before the unbeaten British champion is considered the top 147-pound performer in boxing.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • John Locke
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 7818
    • 411
    • 287
    • 40,060

    #2
    Thurman and Brook always have good things to say about eachother, there's a lot of mutual respect. This is gonna be a massive collision at 147 if Thurman gets past Porter.

    If Thurman beats Porter, I'd like to see him unify with Danny, who I think he would comfortably beat

    After Brook massacres Vargas, I'd like Brook vs Bradley at the end of the year, I think Brook takes that one and sets up a massive unification with Thurman for all 4 belts

    Comment

    • sugar ray lenrd
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2015
      • 1354
      • 55
      • 0
      • 19,309

      #3
      Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
      NEW YORK Keith Thurman's performance against Shawn Porter naturally will be compared to how Kell Brook beat Porter. That's fine by Thurman, who would like to box Brook while trying to become the sport's undisputed welterweight champion. Brook's majority-decision victory over Porter in August 2014 impressed Thurman, but the undefeated WBA welterweight title-holder believes Brook still has plenty to prove before the unbeaten British champion is considered the top 147-pound performer in boxing.
      [Click Here To Read More]
      Hmmm...The same could be said for Thurman, who has he fought?
      -Guerrero
      -Collazo
      -Karate...err Karass can't remember his name...

      I think Brooks should be ranked higher than Thurman for the simple reason that he beat Porter. Here is My Welterwgt ranking:

      -Brooks
      -Thurman
      -Bradley
      -Garcia
      -Vargas
      -Porter
      -Spence
      -Ponomarev
      -Khan
      -Peterson

      Comment

      • Vinnykin
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2016
        • 5150
        • 200
        • 118
        • 78,217

        #4
        So many good fights to be had at 147. It starts with Thurman-Porter, then Brook/Vargas hopefully. Maybe Khan/Garcia (if Mayweather doesn't come back that is), Bradley is still kicking about and Spence will be mandatory for the IBF soon.

        Exciting times

        Comment

        • Sadiqkingofko
          KING!!
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2016
          • 6671
          • 182
          • 190
          • 43,178

          #5
          Originally posted by sugar ray lenrd
          Hmmm...The same could be said for Thurman, who has he fought?
          -Guerrero
          -Collazo
          -Karate...err Karass can't remember his name...

          I think Brooks should be ranked higher than Thurman for the simple reason that he beat Porter. Here is My Welterwgt ranking:

          -Brooks
          -Thurman
          -Bradley
          -Garcia
          -Vargas
          -Porter
          -Spence
          -Ponomarev
          -Khan
          -Peterson
          Good list mine is similar
          1. K. Brook 36-0(25) IBF
          2. T. Bradley 33-2-1(13)
          3. K. Thurman 26-0(22) WBA (Regular)
          4. S. Porter 26-1-1(16)
          5. D. Garcia 32-0(18) WBC
          6. J. Vargas 27-1(10) WBO
          7. A. Khan 31-4(19)
          8. E. Spence Jr. 20-0(17)
          9. L. Peterson 34-3-1(17)
          10. S. Vazquez 21-0(15)

          Comment

          • Oldschool5
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Feb 2016
            • 143
            • 52
            • 64
            • 6,420

            #6
            Originally posted by Sadiqkingofko
            Good list mine is similar
            1. K. Brook 36-0(25) IBF
            2. T. Bradley 33-2-1(13)
            3. K. Thurman 26-0(22) WBA (Regular)
            4. S. Porter 26-1-1(16)
            5. D. Garcia 32-0(18) WBC
            6. J. Vargas 27-1(10) WBO
            7. A. Khan 31-4(19)
            8. E. Spence Jr. 20-0(17)
            9. L. Peterson 34-3-1(17)
            10. S. Vazquez 21-0(15)

            I see both of you guys have Spence in the top 10, in my opinion I think he may be the fastest rising star in the bunch. I probably dont keep up everything like you guys do , but what do you think?

            Comment

            • John Locke
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2013
              • 7818
              • 411
              • 287
              • 40,060

              #7
              1. Brook
              2. Thurman
              3. Spence
              4. Porter
              5. Bradley
              6. Vasquez
              7. Danny
              8. Khan
              9. Ponomarev
              10. Vargas

              I think Spence is probably the top guy at 147 but can't put him at #1 yet, he's not done anywhere near enough

              Comment

              • thack
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 12873
                • 2,935
                • 1,340
                • 53,931

                #8
                Originally posted by Oldschool5
                I see both of you guys have Spence in the top 10, in my opinion I think he may be the fastest rising star in the bunch. I probably dont keep up everything like you guys do , but what do you think?
                All the above lists make sense apart from Peterson having beaten Khan should be ranked above him.......and why Khan is no.1 WBC is completely beyond me.....any idea's?

                Comment

                • Sadiqkingofko
                  KING!!
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2016
                  • 6671
                  • 182
                  • 190
                  • 43,178

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Oldschool5
                  I see both of you guys have Spence in the top 10, in my opinion I think he may be the fastest rising star in the bunch. I probably dont keep up everything like you guys do , but what do you think?
                  He beat Chris Algeri a former champ who gave Amir Khan a tough fight so Errol Spence earned his place in the top 10. Still I believe some people over rate him I can't see him beating Brook or Thurman but he can beat any other fighter @ 147

                  Comment

                  • Sadiqkingofko
                    KING!!
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2016
                    • 6671
                    • 182
                    • 190
                    • 43,178

                    #10
                    Originally posted by thack
                    All the above lists make sense apart from Peterson having beaten Khan should be ranked above him.......and why Khan is no.1 WBC is completely beyond me.....any idea's?
                    Amir Khan was put #1 after he beat Alexander in 12-13-14 since he hasn't lost any fight @ WW ever since he is still the mandatory for Danny Garcia's WBC

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP