Eddie Hearn Finally Admits They Turned Down The Errol Spence Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FrankieBruno
    GGG spanked my mom
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2011
    • 12208
    • 320
    • 12
    • 22,246

    #11
    Spence was telling the truth.



    There were people on here saying Spence is ducking Brook LMAO

    Why would Spence duck if he is fighting in the eliminator

    Spence is willing to come to the Uk

    Comment

    • soul_survivor
      LOL @ Ali-Holmes
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2013
      • 18949
      • 623
      • 473
      • 65,236

      #12
      Vargas is the unification and Spence will likely be mando, so I don't see a problem with this. I don't like Hearn but he hasn't done anything wrong here.

      Comment

      • FrankieBruno
        GGG spanked my mom
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2011
        • 12208
        • 320
        • 12
        • 22,246

        #13
        Originally posted by Boxtime
        It can't be 90% done when today he said that he still waiting for the draft contract to be sent back to him from Vargas.

        Brook will vacate his IBF after winning the WBO and duck Errol Spence. He will lose in a purse bid to Haymon anyway. Haymon will throw ****** money at this fight. Spence is his next cash cow!
        Eddie Hearn has a way with words, but you have to listen to what he says, he tells half truths and tries to pull the wool over people's eyes

        He doesn't want the Spence fight, you can see it in his face, he was giving off nervous energy.

        He was talking about Vargas, but couldn't even name Vargas opponent before Saddam Ali

        " who did he (Vargas) fight before that, it was Pac, he fought Pac, umm or was it Bradly, oh yeah it was Bradly" - Hearn


        Comment

        • talz
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 1344
          • 52
          • 2
          • 12,427

          #14
          Not the first time Hearn has lied and it won't be the last.

          Comment

          • DumpkinsPlus5
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2014
            • 1159
            • 80
            • 18
            • 28,708

            #15
            Originally posted by Boxtime
            Brook will vacate his IBF after winning the WBO and duck Errol Spence. He will lose in a purse bid to Haymon anyway. Haymon will throw ****** money at this fight. Spence is his next cash cow!
            I can't see the future. You're labeling Kell Brook a duck for what you THINK will happen

            Originally posted by soul_survivor
            Vargas is the unification and Spence will likely be mando, so I don't see a problem with this. I don't like Hearn but he hasn't done anything wrong here.
            Thank You, he hasn't done anything wrong. THREE WEEKS ago, Hearns said in an interview (we don't know how far in the past the conversation he was talking about is) he was looking for a big fight and when Spence's name came up, he was told he wasn't ready. About a week ago (sometime AFTER that interview) Spence calls asking for the fight and Hearns says no. Why, because apparently a fight with Vargas is very close.

            It's understandable for Hearns to decline if they are in deep negotiations with Vargas, in a fight that Hearns says is very close. Spence ain't that good or famous that you scrap a unification fight for him.

            Was Hearns lying about the initial conversation of being told Spence wasn't ready? It's possible, but nothing in the timeline of recent events disproves his statement.

            "Why would Spence duck Brook to fight a mandatory that leads to Brook doe?"

            That's an easy question to answer... more experience. Another fight means additional tuning.

            Comment

            • FrankieClutch
              OTSC
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 6084
              • 177
              • 396
              • 26,671

              #16
              Originally posted by John Locke
              Well Spence isn't going anywhere, that boy is gonna be a problem for anyone at 147, he should be mandatory by the end of the year and if Brook takes that fight, I think he takes his first L
              Brook vs Spence might be the best fight at 147

              Comment

              • John Locke
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2013
                • 7818
                • 411
                • 287
                • 40,060

                #17
                Originally posted by FrankieClutch
                Brook vs Spence might be the best fight at 147
                Agree, they're 2 of the 3 best at 147 imo

                Comment

                • Ham Porter
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2013
                  • 2552
                  • 243
                  • 51
                  • 9,574

                  #18
                  Khan fans of the world unite!

                  Comment

                  • STREET CLEANER
                    The Watcher
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 19596
                    • 4,811
                    • 4,395
                    • 298,225

                    #19
                    Hearn loves to drop names to promote his fighters.

                    Spence looked spectacular KOing Algieri and he took some thunder from that to promote his fighter

                    Comment

                    • Robbie Barrett
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 40891
                      • 2,779
                      • 667
                      • 570,921

                      #20
                      Originally posted by FrankieBruno
                      Thanks to Spence's interview from a few days ago, it turns out he was telling the truth. Hearn has changed his story AGAIN

                      Spence's team called Hearn "about 10 Days ago, in other words 3 weeks ago and said they will take the Brook fight. Hearn/Brook said no, fobbed them of with some low numbers. The Vargas fight is still not signed

                      8.32

                      "We looked at numbers and it's not big enough to send Errol Spence at the moment"

                      Where does he say he turned it down? Where would Hearn be sending Errol Spence?
                      Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 05-24-2016, 02:59 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP