Comments Thread For: Golovkin To Fight in September - With or Without Canelo

[SnakeVen0m]

Cause they are better fighters. Not that hard to understand.

I consider Lemeiux GGG only fight moving forward then he moved back again.

You seem to be trying to get me to argue Canelo. Canelo dropped belt. Oh well. What GGG will do now is the discussion.

Honest question. Do you consider the roadblocks GGG gets from fighters or just look at outcome when he's forced to fight the people who are available and step up? Prime example with Canela asking for catch-weights, crazy money splits, dropping belts. All tactics to delay or kill negotiations.

The only person I'd give credit for is Jacobs. Saunders is not that good and Lara is chinny as f-ck.

[Deletrious]

So Lara must face a better fighter than GGG has faced his entire career to get a shot?

If he wants to fight GGG becoming a mandatory is as easy as it can possibly be.

[Fetta]

Honest question. Do you consider the roadblocks GGG gets from fighters or just look at outcome when he's forced to fight the people who are available and step up? Prime example with Canela asking for catch-weights, crazy money splits, dropping belts. All tactics to delay or kill negotiations.

The only person I'd give credit for is Jacobs. Saunders is not that good and Lara is chinny as f-ck.

Canelo again.

Id give credit for Saunder, Jacobs, Lara, Dirrells, Groves, DeGale, and i can go on and on. no more Wades or Monroes but i know we will still get them

[CaneloMaidana]

A year and a half older when you actually look at the months, right? Not close at all huh? Stay smart ; )

Not same age fool.

[Fetta]

If he wants to fight GGG becoming a mandatory is as easy as it can possibly be.

Or the number 1 guy at 154 can fight the number guy at 160 like it has been for YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS in this sport.

Lara must first beat Vanes though who is capable but if he does then no more excuses. And no i dont think Lara can beat GGG but i dont want to fantasize how the fight goes i want to actually see it

[CaneloMaidana]

I like Erislandy Lara in particular and Cuban boxers in general, but constantly calling for GGG to fight someone who isn't a middleweight beltholder or mandatory at this point is ridiculous.
If Lara really wants to move up, and really wants to face GGG, then Haymon can easily make Lara v. Daniel Jacobs. Win that and Lara becomes the mandatory. He's literally one fight away from GGG.

Who Rosado fight to get Golovkin?

[AneesMoha]

Canelo again.

Id give credit for Saunder, Jacobs, Lara, Dirrells, Groves, DeGale, and i can go on and on. no more Wades or Monroes but i know we will still get them

That's not what he asked though....

[ИATAS]

Canelo again.

Id give credit for Saunder, Jacobs, Lara, Dirrells, Groves, DeGale, and i can go on and on. no more Wades or Monroes but i know we will still get them

Wade was a mandatory he had to take after Canelo and Saunders turned him down. Likewise Monroe was an opponent after failed attempts with more lucrative names.

September opponent will boil down too if Saunders or Jacobs are willing and able to fight. After that it's whoever, and quite frankly, not that great (Eubank or Lara would be solid options imo, not ideal but solid nonetheless).

[Travycat]

Sweet comeback!

Not same age fool.

[Fetta]

Wade was a mandatory he had to take after Canelo and Saunders turned him down. Likewise Monroe was an opponent after failed attempts with more lucrative names.

September opponent will boil down too if Saunders or Jacobs are willing and able to fight. After that it's whoever, and quite frankly, not that great (Eubank or Lara would be solid options imo, not ideal but solid nonetheless).

At 35 you shouldnt settle for whatever. If you cant get the big fights in your division then you dare to be great and go find them like the past greats of this sport have