Wilder vs GGG Better Resume

[orechia]

This should be interesting. To me both are the same.

[MPX309]

Would have been Wilder after this weekend if he won, but currently GGG for me.

[TheBoxingXpert]

Wilder. He has a higher KO percentage and his best win, Bermane Stiverne, is better than any win on Golovkin's resume.

[k1llu]

wilder because he's a heavyweight were 1 punch can make a difference, even the weakest heavyweight hits header than lemieux.

[BillyBoxing]

This should be interesting. To me both are the same.

GGG by quantity, he defended his title 15th times.

Not that GGG has beaten really better opposition.

They are both been beating B level fighters, contenders on the world stage, but GGG has been working a lot more and overhall was more impressive.

GGG wouldn't last 11 rounds with a Duhaupas level guy.

[techliam]

Um Wilder has only 1 top 10 win on his resume, against a severely overrated Stiverne, who beat Arreola.

Mw certainly isnt loaded, but its not half as bad as certain people make it out to be (because Golovkin is there) Its certainly no worse than Hw right now which really only has 2 proven fighters in Fury and Wlad. Pulev and Takam/Parker are edging in slowly, but nothing much else.. But even then, we saw the class difference between Wlad and Pulev. Wilder and Josuha are riding off the media hype of having a paper title. I took the two drug cheats out of the equation

[Xoahr]

Golovkin has fought 6 top 10 MWs against Wilders 1 top 10 HW.

I think a lot of people discount the MW division and Golovkin's resume because of the absolute way he has destroyed any and all opposition. He's walked through gatekeepers, titlists and contenders like their punches are papier mache, even fighters other top boxers (lol Canelo) would struggle with. Canelo doesn't TKO Lemieux by the 8th, or put down Geale with a body shot. GGG's a freak of nature.

[NEETzsche]

lemieux and stiverne are good wins over minor titlists. in my opinion, macklin beat sturm, geale beat barker (as well as sturm, obv) and murray beat martinez, so i consider them solid wins too. i give wilder credit for duhaupas and molina, because they picked up solid wins after having lost to him, which is always a big plus to me. then there's not much to separate scott and szpilka from rubio, stevens and rosado. and i feel that monroe, wade, proska and ishida are better than anyone wilder beat prior to scott

so GGG's resume clearly has more depth, by my reckoning. not to mention that he generally looks more impressive than wilder in winning. it's a shame about the povetkin fight falling through, because if wilder had won it obviously would've been the best scalp between them (although he could just as easily have lost)

[Luilun]

This should be interesting. To me both are the same.

GGG are mandatories and even them they're afraid to step in the ring. Wilder's are chosen from some alley behind a bar so how is that the same ?

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Lmao... Some idiots in this thread...


It's clearly ggg..

Wilder has faced and beaten stiverne

GGG has wins over ouma, lemuiex, geale, stevens, macklin, murray, Rubio, all were former champs and contenders