Comments Thread For: Wilder's Manager: We Are Devastated, Povetkin Lied To Us

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brownplayboy310
    Amateur
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 25
    • 3
    • 0
    • 6,162

    #41
    Originally posted by ///
    Not at all. Negative to 70 nanograms is more indicative of a residual detection than anything else. If he took it recently the detection would be above WADA's theshhold and it isn't.

    The "PED expert" who said it proves Povetkin took it recently was... Lou DiBella.

    WADA said no such thing. They said the fight was too soon to do further testing and clear him. That's it. Lou DiBella the con artist filled in the blanks.

    Fishy stuff. Hopefully Povetkin eventually gets his revenge. We should also get the testing out of Nevada. I don't trust these slimy bastards.

    LOL... Taking the side of the guy who got busted cheating, eh? You sound like a real winner.

    Comment

    • brownplayboy310
      Amateur
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 25
      • 3
      • 0
      • 6,162

      #42
      Originally posted by CmdrSoCal
      What BS. Wilders team are throwing a party, now back to the USA for more lopsided crap fights. Povetkin wins by KO. Povetkin has at least as good a chin as Duhaupas but with much better offense, Duhaupas has weak offensive and Wilder got beat up and never scored a knock down verse the french punching bag. If Wilders camp thought .00007 nanograms of pharma would have made the difference then Wilder was going to lose anyway. Drug testing is 100% BS also it can be corrupted a thousand ways or just plain wrong.
      Why don't you go on ahead and step in with a doped up HW? Oh yeah that's right... just another internet gangsta who never laced up. Go eat a fat d1ck ya gayboi.

      Comment

      • alexKO
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 244
        • 10
        • 1
        • 6,308

        #43
        Originally posted by Tobi.G
        Bull****. Height is no indicator at what you should be fighting at. There are middleweight who are 6 foot 2 and there were heavyweights who are 6 foot 0 or even lower who never could fight at cruiserweight.
        Are you familiar with the concept of fat-free BMI? Do some reading on the maximum value attainable in natural bodybuilders, then ask yourself whether boxing training is as anabolic as bodybuilding training. Follow that up with some number crunching using approximate body fat percentages for some top heavyweights. You'll soon see that the likes of Klitschko, Joshua, Tyson, Povetkin, Evan Fields... sorry Evander Holyfield are extremely questionable.

        To say that height has no general bearing on natural weight is farcical.

        PS any heavyweight less than 6 feet tall who isn't obese is on steroids.
        Last edited by alexKO; 05-15-2016, 05:22 PM.

        Comment

        • mathed
          molṑn labé
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 54549
          • 2,741
          • 2,984
          • 224,675

          #44
          Povetkin is innocent. Hymen had one of his goons taint his drinking water so the fight would fall through.... Smh, where will it end?

          Comment

          • Cutthroat
            SOG Ward 32-0
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2006
            • 7840
            • 403
            • 342
            • 47,242

            #45
            Originally posted by CmdrSoCal
            What BS. Wilders team are throwing a party, now back to the USA for more lopsided crap fights. Povetkin wins by KO. Povetkin has at least as good a chin as Duhaupas but with much better offense, Duhaupas has weak offensive and Wilder got beat up and never scored a knock down verse the french punching bag. If Wilders camp thought .00007 nanograms of pharma would have made the difference then Wilder was going to lose anyway. Drug testing is 100% BS also it can be corrupted a thousand ways or just plain wrong.
            Povetkin's been rocked in multiple fights including against a cruiser, Duhaupas' chin is much better and his defense is much better always keeps a high guard.

            They're not even the same physically, Duhaupas is 6'5 with a 82" reach, Povetkin is 6'2 and has a 75" reach. His reach puts him at a HUGE disadvantage against Wilder, shortest reach Wilder's ever faced.

            Duhapaus only landed his jab, that's it, no other punches did damage, you think Povetkin can jab with Wilder? lol

            Comment

            • El-blanco
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2014
              • 12647
              • 616
              • 2,141
              • 23,841

              #46
              Originally posted by Cutthroat
              Povetkin's been rocked in multiple fights including against a cruiser, Duhaupas' chin is much better and his defense is much better always keeps a high guard.

              They're not even the same physically, Duhaupas is 6'5 with a 82" reach, Povetkin is 6'2 and has a 75" reach. His reach puts him at a HUGE disadvantage against Wilder, shortest reach Wilder's ever faced.

              Duhapaus only landed his jab, that's it, no other punches did damage, you think Povetkin can jab with Wilder? lol
              How ******ed are you? You think povetkin and duhaupus have the same offensive capabilities?

              Comment

              • Cutthroat
                SOG Ward 32-0
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2006
                • 7840
                • 403
                • 342
                • 47,242

                #47
                Originally posted by El-blanco
                How ******ed are you? You think povetkin and duhaupus have the same offensive capabilities?
                Wtf are you talking about, I just explained they aren't even the same types of fighters.

                Comment

                • El-blanco
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2014
                  • 12647
                  • 616
                  • 2,141
                  • 23,841

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Cutthroat
                  Wtf are you talking about, I just explained they aren't even the same types of fighters.
                  You responded to the other post talking about how all duhaupus did was jab. It's very clear you think povetkin will be limited because of his reach and won't be able to do anything against wilder. For some reason you used a guy who has virtually no offensive capabilities as the reasoning for that argument. Keep up the sound reasoning bud.

                  Comment

                  • Cutthroat
                    SOG Ward 32-0
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 7840
                    • 403
                    • 342
                    • 47,242

                    #49
                    Originally posted by El-blanco
                    You responded to the other post talking about how all duhaupus did was jab. It's very clear you think povetkin will be limited because of his reach and won't be able to do anything against wilder. For some reason you used a guy who has virtually no offensive capabilities as the reasoning for that argument. Keep up the sound reasoning bud.

                    He brought up Wilder getting hit against Duhapaus, I explained the only punch he landed was his jab, nothing else. They're completely different from a stylistic and physical standpoint.

                    Povetkin would be at a huge disadvantage against Wilder, he HAS to be up close to land his predictable and repetitive combos as hooks travel the shortest amount of distance. He also struggled getting past Wach's jab early, got demolished by Wlad's, it's obvious Wilder's size would give him hell especially his power.

                    Comment

                    • Sledgeweather17
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2015
                      • 3587
                      • 154
                      • 5
                      • 34,855

                      #50
                      Originally posted by ///
                      70 nanograns is almost assuredly within the margin of error for any testing. It's way below WADA's own threshold for a definitive positive. That's WADA's standard, Lou Dibella is free to invent his own version.
                      Nonsense! Dude he tested clean 3 times before he tested positive, it obviously aint residuals from last year, that's bull and you know it!

                      The only explanation now (since he already tested clean THREE ****ing times) is that either he tried to dope in small doses or used something to flush it out after doping but couldn't flush out all of it in time. Either way he a dope cheat

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP