Comments Thread For: Group Against Anti-Semitism Calls For a Ban on Tyson Fury

[alexguiness]

Remeber that article about the worlds richest people control like 90% of the global wealth and they could all fit on one bus?

If I recall, at least half were ***ish.

[Fury4daWIN]

Ban him from what? Speaking his mind? That's illegal unless he's inciting hatred, and I didn't see him do anything remotely close to that.

Fury needs to keep his mouth shut for a while though. This sort of stuff can have real lasting repercussions on his career if he's not careful.

If he wants to keep speaking his mind then he's at liberty to, but he has to understand that we don't live in a world where we're all at liberty to say what we want without negative consequences.

[MDPopescu]

People should not take what Tyson Fury says seriously.. the guy is a troll.

Of course Fury is a troll... and as a Gipsy, he's a "paria" himself...

[- Ram Raid -]

Instead of banning Fury they should use this as an opportunity to open up a national conversation on the topic.

Why do so many people feel that ***s own the banks and the media? Is this based on fact or just paranoia? If it is true how might this affect society? What can be done to ease people's concerns and bring both sides together?

Put all cards on the table and have an open, honest discussion.

Quite a knee jerk reaction by the CAA. I would have hoped that an anti racist group would be better schooled than to fall into the trap of individualising the issue. As you point out Fury's opinions haven't been formed in a cultural vacuum.

Stating that "Britain does not tolerate or support racism" completely shuts down any further dialogue on the systemic problem of racism and paints Fury as a complete aberration, which he isn't. Where can they go from there? Suggest that we poke him with our pitchforks? Which is essentially what they've done. That's not entirely out of character for Jonathan Sarcedoti though.

He's gotten his group some much needed media coverage with their I'll thought out indignation I guess. What they're not taking into account (and I don't say this to excuse his comments) is that Fury is from a much maligned racial group who's way of life has been increasingly outlawed and who have the worst educational levels in the country. He's not a member of a debating society. He didn't attend Oxford like Sacerdoti.

Kevin Mitchell writing in the Guardian was on the offensive in a recent article, the undercurrent of which was him pompously mocking Fury's lack of knowledge and education whilst lauding up his own.

No doubt Tyson Fury is many things, including ignorant, as we all are in our own ways, but what do they expect from him? Not everyone has had the privelage of the kind of upbringing that helps inoculate against bigoted views. ****, Sacerdoti has had about as privileged an upbringing and education as one could have and its not helped him. He's regularly defended the bombing of men, women and children on the **** strip. The man isn't as anti racist as he makes out. He's a lobbyist.

[Hype job]

No I believe that 13 arabs with stanley knives penetrated the U.S's trillion dollsr defense system and the powers that be magically made trillions off the back of that attack - Just by coincidence

I don't need to provide irrefutable information. If you don't believe that Rothschilds control the central banks then good luck with the rest of your life

http://csglobe.com/complete-list-of-...schild-family/

A link to some cooky, fringe, poorly designed website that has no reliable evidence whatsoever is supposed to persuade me? "You don't need to provide irrefutable information" yeah you just keep spouting unsubstantiated bollocks then .

By something similar you mean something factual?

If he said that all ****** are *********s, killers and what not then it would be offensive. If he said that some ******s are terrostits he'd be right because it's a fact.

Same thing with ***s, it's a well known fact that World's biggest banks and entertainment industry are cotrolled by ***ish people, and yet, some f*ggots feel the need to show off how outraged they are....which would be cool (well,to them,at least) if they had something legit to be outraged about, not ****ing facts.

#BanTysonFury

#BanNewsReportersToo

What banks are controlled by ***s?

[Hype job]

What makes you think this is about money only? Also, the 350 bn figure has been debated for a long long time. The family is worth much more than that.

Because they want to own IT ALL. Full control.



It's not a conspiracy that they exist or that they have money or power. It's what they plan to do with it that's a conspiracy.

Zero proof yet again. And in alluding to "owning it ALL" why no mention of the tremendous wealth and power of the Gulf states, like Saudi Arabia or your beloved Qatar, these families likely own more than the Rothschild's.

But that sum pales into insignificance besides the value of the Qatari royal family’s other holdings in London. In a spending spree that started in 2008, the ruling Al Thani family and its assorted investment vehicles, including the Qatar Investment Fund, have acquired a 20% slice of Camden market; posh department store Harrods; 95% of the Shard, at 87 storeys the EU’s tallest building; the Olympic village; half of the world’s most expensive apartment block at One Hyde Park; the Chelsea Barracks site, and the US embassy building in Grosvenor Square.

Along the way, Qatar has also acquired just over a quarter of Sainsbury’s, some 8% of the London Stock Exchange, and nearly 7% of Barclays. As the former Qatari prime minister, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani (not to be confused with the current eighth emir, 34-year-old Sherborne, Harrow and Sandhurst-educated Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, whose London home the neoclassical Cornwall Terrace mansion will be) observed to the Financial Times in a rare 2010 interview, “We are investing everywhere. Even your Harrod’s – we took it.”

http://www.theguardian.com/world/sho...palace-harrods

"What they plan to do with it"

Why no mention of what Saudi Arabia is doing with their money and power? Investing billions in exporting Wahhabism? And don't try discrediting my comparison, these countries are run by families who have ridiculous wealth.

[gmc_rfc_06]

This sport is not run by one overseeing, all powerful commissioner.

You can't ban someone from boxing, mother****ers.

[HeroBando]

This sport is not run by one overseeing, all powerful commissioner.

You can't ban someone from boxing, mother****ers.

Brits run a much tighter ship, right? There actually is a national commission which has handed out bans on fighting in the Uk. He could maybe fight in Germany, but they've got some strong hate speech laws there AFAIK. Several posters in this thread already ran afoul of those. He could always go Russia.

[gmc_rfc_06]

Brits run a much tighter ship, right? There actually is a national commission which has handed out bans on fighting in the Uk. He could maybe fight in Germany, but they've got some strong hate speech laws there AFAIK. Several posters in this thread already ran afoul of those. He could always go Russia.

Even if they b!tch out and ban him in the UK, he'll have plenty of other options.

Boxing is one of those sports, he'll always get a license to fight somewhere. No amount of PC propaganda will change that.

[HeroBando]

Even if they b!tch out and ban him in the UK, he'll have plenty of other options.

Boxing is one of those sports, he'll always get a license to fight somewhere. No amount of PC propaganda will change that.

Totally however his promoter would have a harder time making money there, esp befitting of undisputed HW champ. Unless he gets into purse bids with Povetkins people