Glaser, MarcosVillegas and Steve Kim

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxtime
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 416
    • 39
    • 0
    • 7,029

    #1

    Glaser, MarcosVillegas and Steve Kim

    All guys who are so biased in favour of anything Top Rank, that they have to bash everything any fighter from other promotional outfits does.

    I mean they expect us to to believe that Canelo v Khan did less PPV buys then Canelo v Angulo, after Canelo was coming off a loss to Mayweather and Angulo after a loss with Lara, and in this fight Canelo was coming off a victory over Cotto.

    Does that make any sense at all!

    Canelo v Angulo tickets started at $25
    Canelo v Khan tickets started at $150

    Glaser is full of ****. In fact I think that he numbers released just below 600k are 100% correct. That seems about right!
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #2
    Glaser pretty much slams everyone to be honest

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #3
      They all are, unbiased professionalism is a thing of the past. Kevin Iole is the least biased IMO.

      He's reporting numbers of 460k.


      Comment

      • bballchump11
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 4900
        • 739
        • 1,553
        • 53,366

        #4
        yeah screw Glaser. I never believe the numbers he puts out

        Comment

        • bballchump11
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 4900
          • 739
          • 1,553
          • 53,366

          #5
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
          They all are, unbiased professionalism is a thing of the past. Kevin Iole is the least biased IMO.

          He's reporting numbers of 460k.


          I like Lance Pugmire. Everybody else was posting complete BS during the Mayweather/Pacquiao negotiations and Pugmire was always impartial and gave the most accurate news.

          Comment

          • sicko
            The Truth Hurts
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2010
            • 34211
            • 2,594
            • 839
            • 151,307

            #6
            I disagree about Marcos Villegas, he doesn't come off as Bias to me, does a great job with Fighthub and does great interviews also did some Commentary on Fox Sports I think and does a good job at it. But Glaser seems like some bitter guy that use to be somebody in the sport of boxing as a reporter or writer but is now on the outside looking in and the same with Steve Kim who Swallows anybody that will give him Credentials lol

            Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
            They all are, unbiased professionalism is a thing of the past. Kevin Iole is the least biased IMO.

            He's reporting numbers of 460k.


            Iole is far more reliable than the others so I will go by his number! 460K is a decent PPV Number for that event I think
            Last edited by sicko; 05-12-2016, 03:20 PM.

            Comment

            • DoktorSleepless
              DoktorWakeless
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 11473
              • 440
              • 186
              • 27,349

              #7
              Canelo vs Lara sold less than Angulo when Canelo was coming off his Angulo win and Lara off his Trout win.

              Comment

              • killakali
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2010
                • 7197
                • 226
                • 171
                • 87,195

                #8
                Originally posted by Boxtime
                All guys who are so biased in favour of anything Top Rank, that they have to bash everything any fighter from other promotional outfits does.

                I mean they expect us to to believe that Canelo v Khan did less PPV buys then Canelo v Angulo, after Canelo was coming off a loss to Mayweather and Angulo after a loss with Lara, and in this fight Canelo was coming off a victory over Cotto.

                Does that make any sense at all!

                Canelo v Angulo tickets started at $25
                Canelo v Khan tickets started at $150

                Glaser is full of ****. In fact I think that he numbers released just below 600k are 100% correct. That seems about right!
                dont forget that guy marcos does scoring on pbc cards. he is employed by them i think he is pro pbcs not top ranks

                i thought steve kim does those estrella tv cards for golden boy doesn't he?

                Comment

                • Pigeons
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 14750
                  • 1,211
                  • 714
                  • 37,430

                  #9
                  Originally posted by bballchump11
                  I like Lance Pugmire. Everybody else was posting complete BS during the Mayweather/Pacquiao negotiations and Pugmire was always impartial and gave the most accurate news.
                  That doesn't mean that he has any idea what the PPV numbers are.

                  Comment

                  • ИATAS
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 36648
                    • 2,509
                    • 1,953
                    • 50,835

                    #10
                    Why do people even bother mentioning Glaser anymore? He's a proven hack, and a slimeball at that. He's being do this "release whatever shockingly low PPV figure before anyone else" for a while now and he does it for twitter/facebook followers and to make it look like he's important. He's not. He's not a journalist, let alone a respectable journalist, he's not a respectable human being for that matter, the guy by all accounts is a scumbag.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP