Eddie Hearn Gets Caught In A Lie About Errol Spence

[FrankieBruno]

I mean listening to the video it doesn't even sound like there was a legit offer or Spence was anywhere around during this discussion. It sounded very casual in nature actually.

Hearn: Hey what do you think of Brook vs Spence next
Haymon: We're looking to get a fight or two in first
Hearn: Alright sounds good

I could see this as easily something Spence wouldn't have even been privy to to begin with as there was not much of a discussion & Haymon gots a blueprint for Spence that doesn't involve a title fight in July 2016 its more like April 2017.

So could be that Hearn is bsing, but idk the upside with bsing here in particular when it makes sense that Spence would likely be better moved by throwing him in with some more live bodies after beating his first live opponent before being put in with a legit top 3 or top 5 guy.

By becoming Brooks mando there is no way Hearn can wriggle out of the fight

We all saw what happened with Chaves, he was in the same position as Spence is now and made the fatal mistake in trusting Hearn

I am sure Spence's team saw what happened, being a mandatory challenger = insurance policy

[ramplamp]

You guys are all idiots. Every time either side says something that means the other side is "exposed," as if we have to believe everything that comes out of a person's mouth. Clearly there are two sides to every story, and I wouldn't go trusting what either side says.

[respectthebrush]

I've been looking forward to seeing Kell Brook fight another name since he won that belt. At least Porter fought Broner and is going to fight Thurman since losing it. What a joke...Imagine if this fool actually gets his hands on another belt.

[Eff Pandas]

By becoming Brooks mando there is no way Hearn can wriggle out of the fight

We all saw what happened with Chaves, he was in the same position as Spence is now and made the fatal mistake in trusting Hearn

I am sure Spence's team saw what happened, being a mandatory challenger = insurance policy

Sure that could be another reason I could see Haymon saying nah.

[about.thousands]

"Some Russian dude"

I wonder if arum will let him fight spence though. Surely it would be on pbc cause arum hasn't even put ponamorov on tv.

In the post fight interview fter he beat van heerden they were asking him who'd he like to fight next and he was saying he doesn't care, he'll fight anybody. But he said he got "some type of belt" that can make me a mandatory He doesn't care about the belts either

[HanzGruber]

In the post fight interview fter he beat van heerden they were asking him who'd he like to fight next and he was saying he doesn't care, he'll fight anybody. But he said he got "some type of belt" that can make me a mandatory He doesn't care about the belts either

Lol yea I remember that. Spenc prob doesn't even have that belt now

[BoxingIsGreat]

By becoming Brooks mando there is no way Hearn can wriggle out of the fight

We all saw what happened with Chaves, he was in the same position as Spence is now and made the fatal mistake in trusting Hearn

I am sure Spence's team saw what happened, being a mandatory challenger = insurance policy

Good post. Spence is the real deal. I don't believe Hearn.

[al-Xander]

LOL at these Haymon/Floyd fanatics. They don't know where to go. They love Hearn when it's about Khan. They hate Hearn when it's about Spence.

[FrankieBruno]

LOL at these Haymon/Floyd fanatics. They don't know where to go. They love Hearn when it's about Khan. They hate Hearn when it's about Spence.

My opinions about Hearn have always been the same,

absolute snake and a compulsive liar

he plays games through the media, tells half truths and flip flops from one interview to the next

he's trying to milk brook for one big payday, he has no belief in brooks abilities

brook should sign with haymon

[ShoulderRoll]

The IBF ordered a final eliminator between Spence and Ponomarev.

It happened like two days after Spence beat Algieri, there was no time to duck or negotiate.