Khan batters Kell Brock

[LacedUp]

Why are you against Khan-Brook?

Danny Garcia rematch is a decent back up plan but that's not the fight the fans want the fans want to see Khan vs Brook the two best WW's in Britian and two of the top 10 WW's in the world.

Isn't it obvious why?

[LacedUp]

So the guy who ended him in 4 is easier fight than Brook ?


I can turn that around and say Brook is struggling to fit in at 147.


"Clearly not as good as Brook "
Lmao then you call Khan fans delusional. Look at each fighter's last 3 opponents.

Do you ever say anything not Khan regurgitated?

[FrankieBruno]

I'm not hyping him up. He's a top 5 WW of which none of the others have fought each other. Hmmm unless you rate Bradley's win over Vargas higher?

Top 5 because he beat Devon and a washed up Paulie?

LMAO

Khan beat and stopped a prime Paulie many lifetimes ago. Actually Paulie is on record as saying nobody beat him better than Khan did.

Khan would have handed Devon his ass regardless, Devon was tailor made for Khan.

Porter is not a good boxer, get over it, if Broner had some footwork and some self belief, he would have beaten Porter, possibly stopped him.

[-Kev-]

Yes, he should not get in the ring with an undefeated WW and current champion, fellow countryman, because he'd beat him and we all know that. Let's move on to bigger and better losses. Time to get decapitated by DSG again

[-Kev-]

Why are you against Khan-Brook?

Danny Garcia rematch is a decent back up plan but that's not the fight the fans want the fans want to see Khan vs Brook the two best WW's in Britian and two of the top 10 WW's in the world.

They are also the #1 and #2 ranked welterweights in the world. Usually fans want #1 vs #2

[PivotandRoll]

Are you comparing ****ty Shawn Porter to Canelo? LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Khan beat Diaz and didnt need 2 tries to do it, unlike Shawn, who lost by 3 rounds on my card.

and no Molina didnt drop Khan

Porter is absolute ****, sloppy as ****, inaccurate, no timing, no pattern.

Anyone with a bit of size, movement and who can handle his strength beats him.

All Kenny talks about is how they can;t handle his son in sparring, etc...

Porter is absolute ****, sloppy as ****, no accuracy, no timing....

Wait is this Porter or Khan we are talking about XD

Wait you actually thought I was comparing Porter and Canelo? Ugh, you really are just dumb at the end of the day.

Do you not get tired of this? lying through your teeth to defend a man who's afraid to fight his biggest rival?

[craigus1990]

Still overrating Porter

Broner has no feet nor the strength to keep Porter off him. The same reason why he lost to Maidana. Broner has some of the worst feet in boxing.

But Broner still managed to drop Porter, thats credit to his fast hands an timing, but his footwork will always be his downfall.

You really need to stop hyping up Porter, his dads a joke as well. Porter is a poor boxer, i give him credit for his strength though.

Dude, you're being so intellectually dishonest with yourself in order to conjure up your point, it is borderline ridiculous.
You are saying Porter is not very good and then in the same sentence saying you need strength (and presumably enough power to keep him off) and footwork to beat him.
Having those attributes make you a quality fighter.... so you are essentially saying to beat Porter you need to be good?!?!?
Because we all know Broner is a good fighter and Devon is a decent enough boxer, and they both lost to Porter... so you are saying you need to possess better skills and strength than those two guys...? Well guess what, there aren't that many people in world boxing in and around the weight that actually have those attributes.
What you're saying can be applied to anyone... for example, Khan isn't very good, all you need to beat him is timing and some pop.

[PivotandRoll]

Top 5 because he beat Devon and a washed up Paulie?

LMAO

Khan beat and stopped a prime Paulie many lifetimes ago. Actually Paulie is on record as saying nobody beat him better than Khan did.

Khan would have handed Devon his ass regardless, Devon was tailor made for Khan.

Porter is not a good boxer, get over it, if Broner had some footwork and some self belief, he would have beaten Porter, possibly stopped him.

Yes, Top 5. Unlike Khan who got beat by Algieri and got a gift...and well we saw Chris worth against Spence...

Khan is ****e and only has speed. Paulie was in one of the worst spells of his career when he fought Khan you idiot. Name the better WW's ? but you won't will you , you will continue to put down Porter because you have nothing at all to say Khan has done at WW.

[PivotandRoll]

Dude, you're being so intellectually dishonest with yourself in order to conjure up your point, it is borderline ridiculous.
You are saying Porter is not very good and then in the same sentence saying you need strength (and presumably enough power to keep him off) and footwork to beat him.
Having those attributes make you a quality fighter.... so you are essentially saying to beat Porter you need to be good?!?!?
Because we all know Broner is a good fighter and Devon is a decent enough boxer, and they both lost to Porter... so you are saying you need to possess better skills and strength than those two guys...? Well guess what, there aren't that many people in world boxing in and around the weight that actually have those attributes.
What you're saying can be applied to anyone... for example, Khan isn't very good, all you need to beat him is timing and some pop.

I honestly think it might be Khan on the other end of the screen crying while he types that stuff. How else could a grown man write such drivel? Even when I play his dumb games he still can't comprehend or refuses to.

[M Bison]

Amir Khan would beat Kell Brook, no weight advantage for Kell Brook that and Kell isn't that big of a puncher plus his technique is massively overrated.
Canelo is more talented.