Khan would be GGG's best win?

[Irony123]

I've seen this argument made before. it doesn't make sense to me and the only ones I've seen make this argument are people who have hated on GGG for a long time and have a proven record.

Personally Khan would lose to majority of the people that GGG beat over the last 4 years, and wouldn't be even a top 10 challenge for GGG.

If someone disagrees can you please give me examples of

1) Any top 10 middleweight Khan has beaten?
2) if not then any top 10 JMW/SWW Khan has beaten?
3) if not then any top 10 WW Kahn has beaten?
4) if you have to go down to JWW then why are we even talking about this?

The haters get caught up in name value, it seems like the bigger your name is the bigger challenge you will pose.

Anyways i know this thread will turn into a GGG hate thread but i bet no logical post will be able to provide valid reasoning as to why Khan is such a good fighter and would be GGGs best win...

3...2...1... (enter usual GGG haters)

[bojangles1987]

Anyone who says that is completely wrong.

[boliodogs]

Many of the guys GGG knocked out would beat Khan. Murray, Lemieux, Stevens and probably other middleweights who were KOed by GGG would beat Khan. Many Khan fans think he walks on water but when he fights really good fighters he sinks to the bottom.

[NaijaD]

There's a difference between a high profile name and a quality name. Golovkin's resume doesn't have high profile names but he's beaten a some decent to good middleweights.

Canelo has many high profile names but a lot of them were no longer quality fighters at the time of the fight..... Khan is a high profile name but at 155 he was far from quality.

[eco1]

nope, canela

[-PBP-]

They are obviously trolling.

[Divine Hammer]

beating a very small (two weight divisions lower) glass chin fighter isn't anything significant. it is actually very cowardly. GGG fights for the most part legitimate middleweights.

a 160 lb fighter beating 160 lb lemieux >>>>>>>>>>>> 160 lb fighter feasting on a welterweight who has no business fighting at 160 lb and isn't ranked in teh division

makes sense now???????????????????? so saying khan would be a great name on ggg's resume is a dunce move. big fumble.

[Irony123]

They are obviously trolling.

trolling with conviction...some of them might actually believe it but it would be nice to hear a logical explanation... don't think one can be made up though.

[Irony123]

There's a difference between a high profile name and a quality name. Golovkin's resume doesn't have high profile names but he's beaten a some decent to good middleweights.

Canelo has many high profile names but a lot of them were no longer quality fighters at the time of the fight..... Khan is a high profile name but at 155 he was far from quality.

pretty much what it is.