Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Khan: Look at Kell Brook's Last 10 Foes, Is It Worth Fighting Him?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Khan: Look at Kell Brook's Last 10 Foes, Is It Worth Fighting Him?

    Amir Khan knows he is 'supposed' to get beaten by Saul Alvarez in Las Vegas on Saturday but is using that belief to motivate him towards victory. He remains a significant underdog when he fights for the first time above the welterweight division to challenge WBC middleweight champion 'Canelo' Alvarez at a catchweight of 155lbs.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    in a word nope

    Comment


    • #3
      WTF, Khan's using Canelo's excuses about GGG in relation to him and Brook.

      Somebody remind Khan he said he'd make more money fighting Brook than Khan and to never mind Brook's last 10 foes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Eastcoast View Post
        WTF, Khan's using Canelo's excuses about GGG in relation to him and Brook.

        Somebody remind Khan he said he'd make more money fighting Brook than Khan and to never mind Brook's last 10 foes.
        Brook last ten opponents were complete azz, then look at khans.....its two different levels.


        Why fight a guy for less money, and less cred when you can fighter a bigger guy with a better resume, for more money

        Khan made it clear years ago he didnt want to box in his 30s. Brook is highly unproven and beating sloppy azz Porter isnt enough. Cant believe the ring has this guy ranked at one and he only beat one top ten opponent...period.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
          Brook is highly unproven and beating sloppy azz Porter isnt enough. Cant believe the ring has this guy ranked at one and he only beat one top ten opponent...period.
          Porter was a killer until Brook beat him, now he's "sloppy"

          Comment


          • #6
            More lies from ole glass jaw and he's said it himself , he's always been matched to come out on top avoiding any good fighters where he wouldn't be favorite to win

            Kell Brook won the world title in America against a guy who maybe now but certainly then would be favourite to beat Khan the then undefeated Welterweight champion and highly touted Shawn Porter who is fighting a top welterweight contender in a highly eagerly awaited fight in his own division in a 50/50 fight.

            Khan thinks he's being clever here and yes in smash and grab bank terms maybe but when he gets smashed and knocked out for the third time the Brook fight won't be worth £10 m which it was and all's that people will again remember is Khan being knocked all over the place and out.

            Again a loser with all the normal Khan lies attached, Brook would absolutely hammer him and Khan knows this , if it was so easy as ole glass jaw suggest he should have banked the £10 m but the lier knows different........what a wanker Khan really is!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
              Brook last ten opponents were complete azz, then look at khans.....its two different levels.


              Why fight a guy for less money, and less cred when you can fighter a bigger guy with a better resume, for more money

              Khan made it clear years ago he didnt want to box in his 30s. Brook is highly unproven and beating sloppy azz Porter isnt enough. Cant believe the ring has this guy ranked at one and he only beat one top ten opponent...period.
              Brook's win over Porter trumps any win Khan has in his entire career. That's not even disputable.

              Khan won't fight Brook, but he'll fight Algeri? Come on....

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by denium View Post
                Porter was a killer until Brook beat him, now he's "sloppy"
                a killer to who? who did porter beat to make him a killer? Julio Diaz lol

                I wasnt high on Porter then, or now. He is a decent fighter but no world beater. Brook is a lot more talent, skillwise. Porter has that dog in him which is why he can overcome some fighters even if they are more talented like Broner. I like his temperment and grind hard mind set. Other than that, not much else.

                These last few months people been pumping him up. I even made a thread asking why are people acting like Porter is some beast that Thurman is ducking. Look it up, bro

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Eastcoast View Post
                  Brook's win over Porter trumps any win Khan has in his entire career. That's not even disputable.

                  Khan won't fight Brook, but he'll fight Algeri? Come on....
                  Porters best win is Malignaggi....Khan beat him first

                  Porter beat Alexander.....Khan did as well


                  after those fights its a huge fall of in talent as far as Porters opponents

                  Khan has wins over Judah, Maidana, Kotelnik, Salita, Collazo too


                  be real man....Porter has like 1-3 decent wins whereas Khan put in more work

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by denium View Post
                    Porter was a killer until Brook beat him, now he's "sloppy"
                    he was never a killer. he's actually a very light puncher who just has a hard style to face. the maliganggi ko was a mirage. juts like alexanders ko win over urango.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP