Tweet
True or False?
-
52Yes53.85%28No46.15%24The poll is expired.
-
i'm not sure that i'd pick lara to beat lemieux at 160 considering the trouble angulo gave him
i think lara is a good option for GGG if he can't get unification in his next fight though -
False. Murray is a better win. Lara is good at JMW but at MW you don't know how his chin would react. Lemieux could be a better name too.
Lara is not tested at MW.Comment
-
A guy with a couple of losses, who is smaller, and ran from Canelo like he was covered in AIDS? I fail to see how GGG gets much credit for that win. Hell, Lara may pull a Kermit and just jump out of the ring to get away from GGG.Comment
-
False. Lara is a light middleweight. He would be the best fighter on Golovkin's resume but not his best win.Comment
-
Lara hasn't even won a legit world title. He needs to get that Super WBA title and then make the jump to 160.Comment
-
Murray is garbage. Old man Abraham just kicked his ass and exposed himOriginally posted by _Maxi View PostComment
-
Kicked his ass? I though people had him winning and he suffered an unfair point deduction?Originally posted by aldo5408 View Post
My point is... Lara is no MW. If he ever fights at MW and beat some good MW's then we can agree.Comment
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostPretty much this!Originally posted by Motofan View Post
Lara is a good boxer but only floydiots and Nelo-tards will agree. GGG waxes the floor with Lara and I would give him no credit for beating up on a JMW
Murray macklin and even that bum he just fought are better because they are true MWComment
-
best name in the hardcore community, but a fairly easy win and gives him less trouble than a few of the other fighters GGG faced.Comment
Comment