Comments Thread For: Arum Reveals Details of Crawford vs. Postol PPV Undercard

[PRchamp]

What has happened that we gotten to the point that a undercard fight on HBO boxing after dark has become PPV?? Sad stuff, I think I'm just going to wait for the result and just watch the KO on social media seconds after the result. **** paying $60-70 because I'm a boxing fan crap

Ramirez is nothing to really pay for to watch on ppv,his fight with Abraham was boring.

[UFC_Boxing]

I don't think it's fair to compare GGG-Lemieux to Crawford-Postol. Lemieux is just a sloppy punching bag with no skills and good punching power. He's not great. I think both Postol and Crawford are way better than Lemieux. Lemieux was just another opponent fed to GGG. Now Crawford vs Postol is the two best fighter around at 140 by a big margin. I could also see both going to 147 and win a title. I think only Errol Spence Jr could be a problem to theses at 147.

[The Problem Child]

Everyone here knows I buy every PPV but this will be the first one I don't buy in almost 10 years. Absolute garbage.

[Mitchell Kane]

"Arum said he would need to generate about 75,000 buys, at about $50 apiece, to break even on the event."

"Arum said another fight under consideration for the pay-per-view is a welterweight bout between Jose Benavidez Jr. (24-0, 16 KOs), a former interim junior welterweight titleholder, and Francisco Santana (24-4-1, 12 KOs)."

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...n-bout-july-23

[TheCell8]

Arum's PPV undercards just involve putting his prospects in laughably one sided fights.

This PPV is going to be a disaster.

[$tate of Mind]

Lol @ this fight being on PPV, neither guy is well known yet. Crawford has the potential to be a star but this PPV is premature imo

[krazyn8tive]

Lmao @ this being a ppv