Why doesn't Crawford get the same backlash as GGG?
Collapse
-
No it really is and it's sad..you accuses everyone else of being racist even when they post nothing about race. But all of your post have some sort of race baiting to it or its just down right racist. How and why are you like this?? The only posters who agree with you are obvious trolls and well known racist themselves...Why cant you talk boxing without mentioning race?Comment
-
My post history disagrees. You guys are making **** up. Did you not read that? I do talk about it cause it deals with my favorite sport. Remember Jack Johnson vs Jim Jefferies? Please tell me race didn't have anything to do with that fight.No it really is and it's sad..you accuses everyone else of being racist even when they post nothing about race. But all of your post have some sort of race baiting to it or its just down right racist. How and why are you like this?? The only posters who agree with you are obvious trolls and well known racist themselves...Why cant you talk boxing without mentioning race?
If I truly was a racist I wouldn't of been cool with a black woman on a $20 bill.Comment
-
-
1) Crawford is relatively "new" on the scene and hasn't spent several years as a network darling.
2) Crawford just signed to fight Postol. That right there is more meaningful than anything GG has done.
I'm not bashing Golovkin here, just pointing out the flawed logic in the thread subject. If you want to either attack Bud or bolster Genady, figure out another way because this is a dead end.Comment
-
-
-
Crawford is 28,already moved up 1 division and his resume is on par if not better then GGG's
GGG is 34...................................Comment
-
Comment
Comment