**** the IBF

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Publius
    Banned
    • Jul 2015
    • 471
    • 64
    • 0
    • 676

    #1

    **** the IBF

    I don't know why people try and say that the IBF is better than other boxing organizations when it strips Fury of his rightful title and forces GGG to fight bums.

    At least the other organizations give leeway to the champions.
  • SugarRayCurtain
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 1856
    • 126
    • 13
    • 17,736

    #2
    the IBF is actually superior because it actually makes its champions fight their mandatory challengers
    Nobody forced Tyson fury to take a rematch clause before their first fight, and the IBF wasnt even aware of this from my knowledge. Consequently the IBF had no choice but to strip him. They are enforcing their own rules unlike other Belts who overlook the mandatory challenger because they favour the fighter ie Canelo and the WBC.

    Comment

    • Eff Pandas
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 52129
      • 3,624
      • 2,147
      • 1,635,919

      #3
      Originally posted by SugarRayCurtain
      the IBF is actually superior because it actually makes its champions fight their mandatory challengers
      When some of your recent mandatory challengers are Glazkov, Kevin Bizier, Jo Jo Dan, Dominic Wade & Porky Medina I don't think you can claim superiority. I think most fans would not even have these guys in their top ten in their respective divisions or barely if so. I think the IBF are right there with the rest of these groups who have damaged the sport via their own money making scheme. Not any better, not any worse. All f#cking up the sport for money.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP