A New Ranking System for Boxers

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zerosixthree
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2015
    • 281
    • 24
    • 1
    • 6,871

    #1

    A New Ranking System for Boxers

    I think it's time to introduce a new rating system. The old systems were fine but largely irrelevant these days. I mean who cares about lineal belts or P4P anyway?

    You'll notice there's some maths which I'm sure will give some of you problems and I don't claim credit for this system. It's more of an attempt to formalize the system we already have so without further ado our new system for ranking boxers;

    boxers rank R = **ΣP+1)*(ΣS+1)*(ΣPu^2+1))/(L+1)*(1/ΣO)

    To explain;

    ΣP (or sigma P) is the sum of the buys for the last three PPVs the boxer in question headlined.

    ΣS is the sum of the total Social media followers, Twitter, Facebook etc, that the boxer has.

    ΣPu is the sum of the boxers career purses.

    L is the total amount of losses.

    ΣO is the sum of the rank of the opponents fought also calculated by this formula.

    You'll noticed that there's a lot of plus ones in the formula. That's to prevent any zeroes from appearing in the formula. You don't want to be multiplying or dividing by zero afterall. You will also note that this formula does not take into account a boxers skill or talent. This is largely irrelevant.

    Now, apart from settling a lot of arguments on this board I think this formula could be adopted by the boxing community at large for negotiating fights. I personally feel that we've got a huge problem with people expecting fighters to be given an even playing field or to be treated fairly when fights are made when they don't even have enough instagram followers and I think this will put an end to that.

    For example, who determines the venue? Well you calculate who's boxing rank is the highest and whoever that is gets to decide. Also, any catchweights, boxing glove size, ring size, purse size and other payments, judges, timekeepers, referees, the drug testing regimen should all be decided by the boxer with the highest rank. Furthermore, should a lesser boxer refuse to fight a greater boxer due to disagreements with the conditions placed upon him to make the fight happen we should all denounce it as the duck that it so clearly is.

    So what do you guys think? Do you think this is a good idea?
  • Eff Pandas
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 52129
    • 3,624
    • 2,147
    • 1,635,919

    #2
    I think its a fantastic idea. Lets see some examples sir.

    Comment

    • .!WAR MIKEY!.
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2015
      • 23780
      • 889
      • 769
      • 309,182

      #3
      theories aint **** till applied.

      lets see, apply it. to say last 5 years.

      Comment

      • Eubankjr
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Mar 2012
        • 97
        • 7
        • 0
        • 6,300

        #4
        What do PPV sales, social media followers and purses have to do with how good a boxer is ?

        May as well add in how many grills they've sold.

        Comment

        • soul_survivor
          LOL @ Ali-Holmes
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2013
          • 18949
          • 623
          • 473
          • 65,236

          #5
          Originally posted by zerosixthree
          I think it's time to introduce a new rating system. The old systems were fine but largely irrelevant these days. I mean who cares about lineal belts or P4P anyway?

          You'll notice there's some maths which I'm sure will give some of you problems and I don't claim credit for this system. It's more of an attempt to formalize the system we already have so without further ado our new system for ranking boxers;

          boxers rank R = **ΣP+1)*(ΣS+1)*(ΣPu^2+1))/(L+1)*(1/ΣO)

          To explain;

          ΣP (or sigma P) is the sum of the buys for the last three PPVs the boxer in question headlined.

          ΣS is the sum of the total Social media followers, Twitter, Facebook etc, that the boxer has.

          ΣPu is the sum of the boxers career purses.

          L is the total amount of losses.

          ΣO is the sum of the rank of the opponents fought also calculated by this formula.

          You'll noticed that there's a lot of plus ones in the formula. That's to prevent any zeroes from appearing in the formula. You don't want to be multiplying or dividing by zero afterall. You will also note that this formula does not take into account a boxers skill or talent. This is largely irrelevant.

          Now, apart from settling a lot of arguments on this board I think this formula could be adopted by the boxing community at large for negotiating fights. I personally feel that we've got a huge problem with people expecting fighters to be given an even playing field or to be treated fairly when fights are made when they don't even have enough instagram followers and I think this will put an end to that.

          For example, who determines the venue? Well you calculate who's boxing rank is the highest and whoever that is gets to decide. Also, any catchweights, boxing glove size, ring size, purse size and other payments, judges, timekeepers, referees, the drug testing regimen should all be decided by the boxer with the highest rank. Furthermore, should a lesser boxer refuse to fight a greater boxer due to disagreements with the conditions placed upon him to make the fight happen we should all denounce it as the duck that it so clearly is.

          So what do you guys think? Do you think this is a good idea?
          lol well played

          Comment

          • zerosixthree
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2015
            • 281
            • 24
            • 1
            • 6,871

            #6
            Originally posted by Eff Pandas
            I think its a fantastic idea. Lets see some examples sir.
            Originally posted by !WAR KOVALEV!
            theories aint **** till applied.

            lets see, apply it. to say last 5 years.
            I ain't got time for that! I'm busy revolutionising boxing! Let someone else do the grunt work.

            Originally posted by Eubankjr
            What do PPV sales, social media followers and purses have to do with how good a boxer is ?

            May as well add in how many grills they've sold.
            What has how good a boxer is got to do with anything? Also, when a boxer brings out a new grill the formula will be updated to accommodate it.

            Comment

            • Eubankjr
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Mar 2012
              • 97
              • 7
              • 0
              • 6,300

              #7
              What are u rating then ?

              Comment

              • zerosixthree
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Apr 2015
                • 281
                • 24
                • 1
                • 6,871

                #8
                Originally posted by Eubankjr
                What are u rating then ?
                Boxers, man.

                Comment

                • LaidOut
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 765
                  • 195
                  • 26
                  • 20,111

                  #9
                  You took out the only important aspect in rating a boxer: namely, their skill set. And no two promoters or belt organizations will agree on this formula. Bottom line: you're applying objective criteria to a subjective topic, so this won't work out well.

                  Comment

                  • Citizen Koba
                    Deplorable Peacenik
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2013
                    • 20457
                    • 3,951
                    • 3,801
                    • 2,875,273

                    #10
                    Green K sent.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP