It proves that you're an overly sensitive twat.
Almost 1 yr ago what did floyd vs manny prove ?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
What did peak floyd vs shot manny prove ?
Manny-
It was clear after manny was brutally knocked out by marquez manny wasnt the same.
he beats the robot rios and gate keeper algeiri , but he went all 12 with them. He looked like dog shht in both fights
Then fights floyd .
1. Manny is reported to have cramps
2. Manny has a floyd mole in his camp
3.manny had to stop sparring for some reason
4.floyd gets caught taking an illegal iv which is usually done to mask peds (had it been done the otherway around most floyd fans would have shht bricks). All the while he and his fans say he makes 147 easy , so easy they say he can get to 145 np .
5.manny takes a selfie entering the ring
Floyd-
He fights canelo who at the time was considered green as his best undisputed win to date was josesito lopez and alfonzo gomez , two 140 pounders brought up to 154
(Trout fight by many was considered at gift decision to canelo or robbery in Texas).
He out boxed canelo at a catchweight as most thought he would.
He then fights maidana twice
In fight 1 , he loses the first half of the fight and wins most the rounds the second half of the fight in which many thought he lost or at worst drew with with maidana
Its was a disputable victory in which floyd decided to rematch maidana and clearly beat him by points although he was hurt at minimum of 3 times by the hard hitting maidana. He then fights pacman
The biggest thing remebered by the pacman fight was the illegal iv floyd took for some mysterious reason. Then there was the mysterious shoulder injury.
So I ask you . What did pacman vs floyd prove last may?
Are you serious?
LoooooooolComment
-
That despite the critism he receives Bob Arum has done a very good job in handling Manny's career, particularly getting him back to a position where that fight was even possible.
That despite the late career rhetoric concerning 'legacy', Floyd is and has essentially always been, a hustler.
That despite the high regard he was held in, Manny was never beating a counter puncher of Floyd's calibre.
That despite no actual medical procedures being performed some fans seem to have been left lobotomised by the trauma of watching their idol lose.
And that in lieu of their respective retirements us Brits seem intent on bolstering boxing's now depleted fanboy quota by going full ****** with a Brook-Khan battle line.Comment
-
What did it prove?
Narratives draw money, not good fights.
Even though people knew exactly how that fight would go down, they still shelled out big $ hoping to see otherwise - ie Floyd losing.
Floyd is a genius when it comes to making money.
Floyd v Manny I was part immediate cash grab, and part setup for Floyd v Manny II, if they feel they could rob viewers one more time.
Boxing fans cannot let things go. Floyd v Manny is no longer beating a dead horse, it's stabbing the skeletal remains of an unknown carbon lump.Comment
-
Who hates ****'s, cheats on his wife, has illegitimate children and likely doesn't care about helping his country as much as he claims otherwise he would of paid his taxesComment
Comment