Let's be honest...GBP pays off judges in Canelo's fights...

[R-C]

Even the Cotto fight, One judge gave him 11 rounds the other 10. Lol , honestly I clearly had it a draw. This Mexican fraud is an overrated fighter who knows he can bribe judges against GGG as they would play no role.

Because you had it a draw, everyone else are wrong. I like your logic.

[soul_survivor]

Austin Trout fight 118-109
Mayweather fight 114-114
Lara fight 117-111

I don't know which one is the worse...he barely won a round against Floyd..trout I thought was a draw and Lara could have went either way..

Good luck Khan, even if you stay on your feet for 12 you're gonna get jobbed regardless...

The worst were the scorecards for the Cotto fight. Believe whatever you want about the winner of the fight but it was far from clear but the judges had it 118-110, 119-109 and 117-111...thats terrible.

Cotto wasn't gonna win the fight by any margin that night, no matter what happened.

[Jsmooth9876]

Exactly. Stop this BS about the Trout fight he got dropped put on his butt and then because of horrible open scoring which announced that he won the fight after 8 rounds and could only lose if he was Knocked out Canelo coasted the final rounds. If not for that I believe Canelo either drops him again or knocks him out. Either way Trout lost this fight and even he knows it during his ring post fight interview said flat out I lost he was the better man, I had no answers to what he was doing ect. If even Trout says he lost why the hell are idiots trying to argue he won? Lara ran and has no one to blame but himself. Mayweather is the only fight that's questionable and that judge who scored it got dealt no longer scoring fights same idiot who gave Bradley the win over Pacman.

Let's get real, the Lara fight was not 117-111.. No fking way...

[Jsmooth9876]

The worst were the scorecards for the Cotto fight. Believe whatever you want about the winner of the fight but it was far from clear but the judges had it 118-110, 119-109 and 117-111...thats terrible.

Cotto wasn't gonna win the fight by any margin that night, no matter what happened.

I thought Canelo clearly won the Cotto fight even though it was competitive...the 3 cards show the judges pretty much saw the same thing.... These other cards scream of favoritism for Canelo....the Lara card and Mayweather card are laughable..

[soul_survivor]

I thought Canelo clearly won the Cotto fight even though it was competitive...the 3 cards show the judges pretty much saw the same thing.... These other cards scream of favoritism for Canelo....the Lara card and Mayweather card are laughable..

You're only complaining cos you like the skin pigmentation of those other two guys. The judges score cards had Canelo beating Cotto by 10 or 9 rounds. You really think Cotto only won 2 rounds?

[SeekDaGreat]

Lara fight was the only one that could have went either way.

However,yes those were three terrible score cards. Happens all the time (not just in Canelo fights)

[Boxfan83]

i dont know about that but what i do know is gbp has had more crazy judging at their promotional events then top rank and pbc combined

Not to mention some shady refereeing.

[bigdunny1]

Let's get real, the Lara fight was not 117-111.. No fking way...

It is if you don't like running! If you are judging and you don't like that style of fighting then all the close rounds where NOTHING happened you give to Canelo because he at least came forward trying to make it a fight while the other guy went backwards running. I had the fight closer then that but it's not really that crazy a score card for a nightmare style fight. My rule is if it's close I give the round to the aggressor and harder puncher. That was Canelo. If Lara was going to fight like that he needed to DOMINATE the punch stats and be more active or sit down on his punches and do some damage at spots. Instead he did neither and ran so you have no right to cry about the judges when that happens.

[Jsmooth9876]

You're only complaining cos you like the skin pigmentation of those other two guys. The judges score cards had Canelo beating Cotto by 10 or 9 rounds. You really think Cotto only won 2 rounds?

Lol, no.... I don't like Lara at all...Cotto was one of my favorites as well..I had it like 8-4 Canelo I think. He controlled the fight. Cotto couldn't do anything to back him up one bit. Too strong,too big...he lost....

[Jsmooth9876]

It is if you don't like running! If you are judging and you don't like that style of fighting then all the close rounds where NOTHING happened you give to Canelo because he at least came forward trying to make it a fight while the other guy went backwards running. I had the fight closer then that but it's not really that crazy a score card for a nightmare style fight. My rule is if it's close I give the round to the aggressor and harder puncher. That was Canelo. If Lara was going to fight like that he needed to DOMINATE the punch stats and be more active or sit down on his punches and do some damage at spots. Instead he did neither and ran so you have no right to cry about the judges when that happens.

Lara was hitting him with 1-2's all night. Canelo went to the body but was flailing all night up top looking terrible..he can't cut the ring off to save his life.....I hate Lara, he gets so much credit on here for never winning a big fight..but that card was crazy...