How come, you make it a point to note that DeLaHoya-Molina & Chavez-LaPorte were somewhat controversial decisions....
...yet fail to do the same when it comes to Rosario-Ramirez I ?
No need to answer, actually.
Nah, cause I added both those fights, because Im Puerto Rican. The List is actually copied and pasted from the web
Vargas was Vargas in the Oscar fight, he was doing good.
He was just too young to be facing guys like that so early. Steroids ****ed up him
Sorry for a kid (Sanchez) ruining Gomez forever, he got brain damage
too bad Gomez was a 122 not a 126 or 130 like Sanchez, oh and Gomez now admit that he was on drugs several months before that fight. So i guess i could use your excuse and say that Drugs ****ed Gomez up not Sanchez....right?
By the way that's why he is remembered as the greatest 122 ever.
Just so you know Sanchez was the best thing to come out of Mexico. So I am not ashamed of my favorite fighter being beat by a great 126/130 fighter that could have been so much greater if he wouldn't have died.
I hate how you Puerto Ricans say Tito destoyed Vargas career, did you ****ing forget the steroids he took that FU*&*ED HIM UP? Fuc* Frito Trinidad, freaking cheater.
First of all ask anyone who would have the sense to know that if it was a terrible mistake putting Vargas against Tito that early in his career...Most of them will agree. Whether you like Tito or not Vargas was never been the same after that fight. Example of that was the fight he had after tito..Wilfredo Rivera, he went down to the softest hit and you can clearly see that he was not the same fighter. Yes He got back up and whooped the guy but still.
Second: How is it that you can write something like what you wrote at the bottom and still be able to call Tito a cheater??
"did you ****ing forget the steroids he took that FU*&*ED HIM UP? Fuc* Frito Trinidad, freaking cheater."
Comment