Should There Be a Mayweather-Pacquiao Rematch?
Collapse
-
Yes, there is another one!
Isn't it that a rematch is warranted if it's a close fight?
A close fight should score 7-5 that's close isn't it?
Have you forgotten that was your score card once you examined the fight again? I know you'll say this, so I'll say it for you, the best score you can give for Pac was 5-7.
Isn't that a close fight? Isn't that deserving of a rematch based on your findings?
Oh,
And my previous question. I'll add some more. Is Danny Garcia better than Pac?
Is going for a cheaper pay day in fighting Danny than getting 3x more fighting Pac for a rematch. What does it tell you?
I'll wait.
As one of the 20%. You are wrong! Don't speak for me please. Please spoon. You claimed all 20% agree with you. You are wrong.
Be a man and admit all encompassing statements are ******.
I will wait..Last edited by Zaroku; 05-06-2016, 11:20 PM.Comment
-
No, they'd have to pay me to watch Mayweather vs Pacquiao again 38 20.65%
Here are the list:
1. Boring fight. Why? One ran the other chased
2. Too much excessive hugging by a suspected roided cheater
3. The bigger man would rather run than stay in the pocket. ( Pac commanded the center of the ring and pushed Floyd off the ropes )
4. They felt robbed for such a steep price for a marathon event they don't want to be fooled from buying into that same scenario again. Since if Floyd doesn't change his boring game of cat and mouse. This will likely happen again in the rematch. ( Floyd needs to redeem himself from his ***** boxing)
5. Value for money. - there is no value in watching two old timers play hide and seek. It takes 2 to tango. If Floyd doesn't want to play the fight game right. It should be free. Hence, those who will watch wants it free.
6. The boos from around the world so a vagina run around from a midget. They don't want to pay for that anymore.
7. Running from a one armed man when you are suppose to be the bigger man not to mentioned roided up is just simply cringe worthy pathetic and doesn't deserve a single centavo from them.
Conclusion: any of this scenarios means Floyd stunk up the joint and needs to redeem himself in a rematch worthy of a true warrior that he isn't perceived to be at this point.
And the boos from the MGM still haunts Floyd to this day..
And if you think it's because Floyd will win again easy. Then it's the 2nd option you should have voted on. Simple.
# looks at the poll. Unfinished business written all over it.
Last edited by Spoon23; 05-06-2016, 11:39 PM.Comment
-
Lol read between the lines they don't want to watch it if they are going to pay for it. They felt ripped off. What does that tell you?
No, they'd have to pay me to watch Mayweather vs Pacquiao again 38 20.65%
Here are the list:
1. Boring fight. Why? One ran the other chased
2. Too much excessive hugging by a suspected roided cheater
3. The bigger man would rather run than stay in the pocket. ( Pac commanded the center of the ring and pushed Floyd off the ropes )
4. They felt robbed for such a steep price for a marathon event they don't want to be fooled from buying into that same scenario again. Since if Floyd doesn't change his boring game of cat and mouse. This will likely happen again in the rematch. ( Floyd needs to redeem himself from his ***** boxing)
5. Value for money. - there is no value in watching two old timers play hide and seek. It takes 2 to tango. If Floyd doesn't want to play the fight game right. It should be free. Hence, those who will watch wants it free.
6. The boos from around the world so a vagina run around from a midget. They don't want to pay for that anymore.
7. Running from a one armed man when you are suppose to be the bigger man not to mentioned roided up is just simply cringe worthy pathetic and doesn't deserve a single centavo from them.
Conclusion: any of this scenarios means Floyd stunk up the joint and needs to redeem himself in a rematch worthy of a true warrior that he isn't perceived to be at this point.
And the boos from the MGM still haunts Floyd to this day..
And if you think it's because Floyd will win again easy. Then it's the 2nd option you should have voted on. Simple.
# looks at the poll. Unfinished business written all over it.
Comment
-
# your words not mine, your only excuse was for option 3 it is not worth the money. Reason for not worth the money?
Here are the list:
1. Boring fight. Why? One ran the other chased
2. Too much excessive hugging by a suspected roided cheater
3. The bigger man would rather run than stay in the pocket. ( Pac commanded the center of the ring and pushed Floyd off the ropes )
4. They felt robbed for such a steep price for a marathon event they don't want to be fooled from buying into that same scenario again. Since if Floyd doesn't change his boring game of cat and mouse. This will likely happen again in the rematch. ( Floyd needs to redeem himself from his ***** boxing)
5. Value for money. - there is no value in watching two old timers play hide and seek. It takes 2 to tango. If Floyd doesn't want to play the fight game right. It should be free. Hence, those who will watch wants it free.
6. The boos from around the world so a vagina run around from a midget. They don't want to pay for that anymore.
7. Running from a one armed man when you are suppose to be the bigger man not to mentioned roided up is just simply cringe worthy pathetic and doesn't deserve a single centavo from them.
Conclusion: any of this scenarios means Floyd stunk up the joint and needs to redeem himself in a rematch worthy of a true warrior that he isn't perceived to be at this point.
And the boos from the MGM still haunts Floyd to this day..
Now that's what I call precise.
I used your argument and made it clearer. Now I just made you look like a fool again lmaoLast edited by Spoon23; 05-07-2016, 12:33 AM.Comment
-
Lol rant all you want. You know what I say it's true. If they think Floyd will just win again they would have chose option 2, but since you chose option 3. It only proves you didn't realize you should have chose option 2 lmao.
# your words not mine, your only excuse was for option 3 it is not worth the money. Reason for not worth the money?
Now that's pretty dumb.
You are not me, option 3 is what I chose.
I don't say ****** stuff like "you wanted to chose option 2 and you know it because you want to believe whatever.
You are a not logical Everyone, always, all fans, all people. You are ****** to project. Many laugh at you. Not everyone, but many. Speak for yourself only.
Not worth the money because PAC lacks the ability to cut off the ring and. Make it rough like Castillo and Maidana did.
Speak for yourself, I have said this many times, PAC is one dimensional. Don't speak for meLast edited by Zaroku; 05-07-2016, 12:25 AM.Comment
-
Wrong again! You can only speak for yourself. I was in the 20 percent and you are wrong. Don't project, stop lol and start trying to think!
You are not me, option 3 is what I chose.
I don't say ****** stuff like "you wanted to chose option 2 and you know it because you want to believe whatever.
You are a not logical Everyone, always, all fans, all people. You are ****** to project. Many laugh at you. Not everyone, but many. Speak for yourself only.
Not worth the money because PAC lacks the ability to cut off the ring and. Make it rough like Castillo and Maidana did.
Speak for yourself, I have said this many times, PAC is one dimensional. Don't speak for me
# fighting without cutting the ring since he can easily get to any guy with his excellent footwork if he wants to without even having to cut is impressive, and is always better than running around with a vagina.
# looks at the poll. Damn right this is unfinished.
Last edited by Spoon23; 05-07-2016, 12:43 AM.Comment
-
Again, you are making all encompassing statements.
Can you just say. I and many others want a rematch??
Can you be objective?? Do you know what that word means???
I think some people dismiss you because of these all encompassing statements.
I think it would increase your credibility if you stopped trying to be a spokesman for everyone. Can you at least try to avoid all encompassing terms.
What about your more accurate poll??Comment
-
Again faulty logic. Do you know why each and every person booed???
Again, you are making all encompassing statements.
Can you just say. I and many others want a rematch??
Can you be objective?? Do you know what that word means???
I think some people dismiss you because of these all encompassing statements.
I think it would increase your credibility if you stopped trying to be a spokesman for everyone. Can you at least try to avoid all encompassing terms.
What about your more accurate poll??
The fact is 20% still want to watch it for free. Means they are fine by it as long as it's free. Simple English.
It only shows they don't want to be ripped off again.
# the poll is pretty straight forward, enjoy. Don't complicate. You'll look like a fool.
@ around 2:05 - You are losing son!
@ 2:20 Floyd jr to Floyd Snr.: no matter what I love you.. (ready to lose)
Last edited by Spoon23; 05-07-2016, 12:58 AM.Comment
-
You are the fool. It's like you have become the ultimate Floyd persona. Moving the goal post every time a point has been addressed.
The fact is 20% still want to watch it for free. Means they are fine by it as long as it's free. Simple English.
It only shows they don't want to be ripped off again.
# the poll is pretty straight forward, enjoy. Don't complicate. You'll look like a fool.
I speak 3 languages, not that this matters, you speak English and illogicish, maybe Tagalog!
I didn't feel ripped off the first time. So again, your faulty logic and bias shine through. It seems you can't speak in simple unloaded questions.
It is not worth paying 100 dollars to see Floyd vs PAC! Don't add your bull crap to a direct and clear statement.
Why?? The fight wasn't competitive. Period. Floyd beat him. Floyd beat PAC in the ring! Floyd humiliated a midget in Marquez.
Castillo 1 was close, so was Maidana 1, in comparison PAC wasn't close. PAC lost.
Now he faces lawsuits for lying about his undisclosed injuries. Even a Filipino law firm is suing Roach and Arum for lying. They can't sue PAC, not in the Philippines.Last edited by Zaroku; 05-07-2016, 01:03 AM.Comment
Comment