The Ring removes Pacquiao from P4P rankings

[BrometheusBob.]

I think they removed him because he retired.

That's how I understand it.

Boxrec & TBRB still have Pacquiao on theirs and both have him at #2.

[!! Shawn]

Pacquiao & Bradley were both removed from the P4P rankings today, which made room for Naoya Inoue & Kell Brook. For Pacquiao, this is the first time not listed in the top 10 since he beat Marco Antonio Barrera late in 2003. I wonder if that marks some kind of record.

So long on a great career champ

On a side note, what do y'all think of Inoue & Brook being on the P4P list?

Well, he did just retire, I assume thats why he was removed, and Bradley just lost.

[M Bison]

Who looks good against Porter though?


None of the WW's are fighting each other, he has the best win of the bunch

I'd still have both Pacquiao and Bradley ahead of him also how could they not have a cruiserweight in that top 10?
This is a blatant biased top 10 which doesn't appreciate European fighters which aren't based in America tbh Inoue put in the top 10 list is really random as **** yes he is good but he has a lot left to prove with only 9 fights.
Point is there are many fighters right now that are more deserving to be in that list than Kell Brook here is a very good example and I hate this guy James Degale.

[Beercules]

I'd still have both Pacquiao and Bradley ahead of him also how could they not have a cruiserweight in that top 10?
This is a blatant biased top 10 which doesn't appreciate European fighters which aren't based in America tbh Inoue put in the top 10 list is really random as **** yes he is good but he has a lot left to prove with only 9 fights.
Point is there are many fighters right now that are more deserving to be in that list than Kell Brook here is a very good example and I hate this guy James Degale.

Thats true, Chunky should be on.

[Larry the boss]

Welcome to the new age fellas

[Larry the boss]

how can they remove pac for beating bradley is it april fools?

he retired!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[hugh grant]

I think they removed him because he retired.

Because he said he's retired, they did the same with Mayweather.

He may change his mind, but might have been better off not to say it then. And its not as if he's certain what he wants next he said 50 50 whether he fights again

[BrometheusBob.]

I'd still have both Pacquiao and Bradley ahead of him also how could they not have a cruiserweight in that top 10?
This is a blatant biased top 10 which doesn't appreciate European fighters which aren't based in America tbh Inoue put in the top 10 list is really random as **** yes he is good but he has a lot left to prove with only 9 fights.
Point is there are many fighters right now that are more deserving to be in that list than Kell Brook here is a very good example and I hate this guy James Degale.

I think Glowacki can't be far off the P4P lists. Cunningham would be a decent win, not sure he'd be a shoo-in for top 10 after but he'd have a decent case.

[BrometheusBob.]

I'd prefer Estrada over Inoue right now. Inoue may have more potential, but they should wait a little bit before crowing him.

The DeGale/Jack would go imo or Cruz/Frampton winner over Brook if those fights happen this year.

No question about both of those winners imo. Even though I don't care for Cruz or Frampton, it's a solid matchup.

[M Bison]

I think Glowacki can't be far off the P4P lists. Cunningham would be a decent win, not sure he'd be a shoo-in for top 10 after but he'd have a decent case.

I'd still have Lebedev in the listing over someone like a Brook or Inoue he's only lost to Huck who is a great fighter that and a roided up Gullermo Jones who failed the drug testing twice for their fights.

Lot left to be proven is all sorta reminds me of the UFC ranking jumping the gun a bit.