Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was everyone watching the same fight I was? Pac didn't look that great.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Was everyone watching the same fight I was? Pac didn't look that great.

    The fight was definitely much closer then the judges had it and was definetly the most competitive fight of the trilogy.

    With that said, HBO commentators were on Pacquiaos **** as always. He looked like a shot fighter and didnt look as great as he used to. But thats age, a long layoff, rotator surgery.

    If he fought Floyd a second time he would get schooled worse then the first time and this is coming from a Pac fan who thinks the Pac of 08-09 would have beat Floyd.

  • #2
    I think your question should be: Did I watched the same fight as everyone?

    This fight was not close at all.

    Comment


    • #3
      He's 37 years old and at the very end of his career. That said, he was still good enough to beat Bradley who is difficult to look amazing against. If you're looking for the old Pacquiao that blitzed through opponents you're going to need a time machine, as he's simply an older fighter now - still good enough to beat most guys but he's only got so much left in him.

      Comment


      • #4
        Technically fought a damn near perfect fight, it was beautiful. Physically he showed decline, but it was good too see him with so much fire in his belly, he looked mean in there.

        Comment


        • #5
          he looked great when he was throwing 1000 punches against stationary garbage like Margarito.

          This is much better boxing to watch when theres an actual chess match in the beginning, then picking his spots towards the end.

          He also looked good defensively, blocking punches.

          Comment


          • #6
            This is how he's always looked against boxers. I thought it was a 9-3, 8-4 type of fight.

            Comment


            • #7
              Post on your real account idiot.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by bigtyivier2k2 View Post
                The fight was definitely much closer then the judges had it and was definetly the most competitive fight of the trilogy.

                With that said, HBO commentators were on Pacquiaos **** as always. He looked like a shot fighter and didnt look as great as he used to. But thats age, a long layoff, rotator surgery.

                If he fought Floyd a second time he would get schooled worse then the first time and this is coming from a Pac fan who thinks the Pac of 08-09 would have beat Floyd.
                How bad was the stream u was watching the fight from?

                Comment


                • #9
                  He looked good for a 37 year old. He still has the ability to beat good fighters but there's no denying he has declined. His legs aren't quite what they were but he's 37, what do you expect?

                  With that said, as usual Bradley was doing good work that HBO ignored and stayed silent until Pacquiao landed something again. That fight was closer than people care to admit.

                  I hope Manny retires though, there's going to come a time very soon where he's losing to fighters that have no business beating him.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    He fought the perfect fight like other said. Left hand was landing when he wanted, hook was catching Bradley on the way in.


                    37 years old.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP